Indications for implantable cardiac defibrillators in patients with congestive heart failure: Implications of the sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial

Current Cardiology Reports - Tập 7 - Trang 223-228 - 2005
Isaac Pourati, Michael Hyder, Lawrence Rosenthal1
1Department of Medicine, The Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section, Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, USA

Tóm tắt

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant cause of mortality in patients suffering from heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of SCD in this population. Recent clinical trials have redefined the indications and patient profiles for their use: from secondary prevention to primary prevention of SCD. In this article, we review the clinical trials contributing to the current practice guidelines, which include device therapy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA: Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation 2001, 104:2158–2163. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, et al.: Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:637–646. Zipes DP, Roberts D: Results of the international study of the implantable pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator. A comparison of epicardial and endocardial lead systems. The Pacemaker-Cardioverter-Defibrillator Investigators. Circulation 1995, 92:59–65. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators: A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997, 337:1621–1623. Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, et al.: Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation 2000, 101:1297–1302. Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, Ruppel R: Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH). Circulation 2000, 102:748–754. Salukhe TV, Dimopoulos K, Sutton R, et al.: Life-years gained from defibrillator implantation: markedly nonlinear increase during 3 years of follow-up and its implications. Circulation 2004, 109:1848–1853. Bokhari F, Newman D, Greene M, et al.: Long-term comparison of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone: eleven-year follow-up of a subset of patients in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). Circulation 2004, 110:112–116. Oseroff O, Retyk E, Bochoeyer A: Subanalyses of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator trials: antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID), Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), and Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH). Curr Opin Cardiol 2004, 19:26–30. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: summary article. Circulation 2002, 106:2145. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, et al.: The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1984, 69:250–258. Singh SN, Fletcher RD, Fisher SG, et al.: Amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:121–122. Wilber DJ, Olshansky B, Moran JF, Scanlon PJ: Electrophysiological testing and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Use and limitations in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function. Circulation 1990, 82:633–635. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al.: Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:1933–1940. Patients with a history of prior MI, LVEF < 0.35, an episode of NSVT, and inducible nonsuppressible VT on EPS were randomized to ICD implantation versus conventional medical therapy. After a mean follow-up of 27 months, there was a 54% relative risk reduction in death from any cause in the ICD group vs the medical therapy group (16% vs 39%). Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al.: A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:1933–1940. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, et al., for the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators: Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:877–883. Patients with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy and an LVEF < 0.30 were randomized to ICD implantation versus conventional medical therapy with a primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. During an average follow-up of 20 months, the ICD group exhibited a relative risk reduction of 31% in all-cause mortality. Klein H, Auricchio A, Reek S, Geller C: New primary prevention trials of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: SCD-HEFT and MADIT-II. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83:91D-97D. Burdy GH: SCD-HEFT results. Presented at the American College of Cardiology. New Orleans, LA. March 2004. http://www.sicr.org/scdheft_results_acc_lbcc.pdf Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, et al.: Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2151–2158. Bristow M, Saxon L, Boehmer J, et al.: Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2140–2150. The utility of cardiac resynchronization was examined in patients with NYHA functional class III-IV heart failure and with QRS duration over 120 msec and LVEF < 0.35. The COMPANION trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in all-cause hospitalizations and a 36% reduction in mortality alone with theCRT-D device (ICD with biventicular pacing), compared with optimal medical therapy. De-Vreede-Swangemakes J, Gorgels A, Dubois-arbouw W, et al.: Out of hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990’s: a populationbased study of Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30:1500–1505. Wilber DJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al.: Time dependence of mortality risk and defibrillator benefit after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004, 109:1082–1084. The DAVID Trial Investigators: Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002, 288:3115–3123. Hyder M, Davoudi R, Healy E, et al.: Delivery of therapy in association to QRS width in prophylactic ICD implantation. Presented at the 77th Scientific Session of the American Heart Association. New Orleans, LA. November 2004.