India’s trade with South and Central Asia: an application of institution-based augmented gravity model

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 - Trang 1-12 - 2023
Suadat Hussain Wani1, Effat Yasmin2
1Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi, India
2Department of Economics, University of Kashmir, Hazartbal, Srinagar, India

Tóm tắt

The present study investigates the effect of regional and bilateral trade agreements supported by institutional framework on bilateral trade between India and selected South and Central Asian countries. The augmented gravity model that corrects for zero trade, endogeneity and heterogeneity is used. The model is developed by applying OLS and PPML (Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood) estimation technique using panel dataset of 22 countries from 1996 to 2020. Empirical results show that trade agreements have failed to enhance trade between selected countries. However, institutional framework positively contributes to trade integration among these countries. The key finding of this study is that regional trade agreements supported by institutional framework play an important role in promotion of trade among these countries. Thus, the government needs to pay attention to enhance institutional quality to reap the benefits of trade integration.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acemoglu D, Yared P (2010) Political limits to globalization. Am Econ Rev 100(2):83–88 Akhter N, Ghani E (2010) Regional integration in South Asia: An analysis of trade flows using the gravity model. Pak Dev Rev 105–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41263356 Alvarez IC, Barbero J, Rodríguez-Pose A, Zofío JL (2018) Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Dev 103:72–87 Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1):106–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1802501 Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):342–352. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411587 Anderson JE, Van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214 Angkinand AP, Chiu EM (2011) Will institutional reform enhance bilateral trade flows? Analyses from different reform aspects. J Econ Policy Reform 14(3):243–258 Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005 Bakhsh S, Yin H, Shabir M, Ali K (2022) China trade with belt and road countries: the role and impact of institutions. China Econ J 15(1):29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1994709 Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67(3):474. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976 Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928061 Bergstrand JH (1990) The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model, the linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ J 100(403):1216. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233969 Bown CP (2017) The slow unraveling of US trade policy in the age of Trump (No. 2060-2018-351) Briggs K (2013) Institutional quality as a barrier to trade. Appl Econ Lett 20(16):1453–1458 Coulibaly S (2004) On the assessment of trade creation and trade diversion effects of developing RTAs. University Lausanne Working paper No45, Lausanne De Groot HL, Linders GJ, Rietveld P, Subramanian U (2004) The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57(1):103–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Model Work in a Classical World?. In: Frankel J (ed.) The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago University Press De Jong E, Bogmans C (2011) Does corruption discourage international trade? Eur J Polit Econ 27(2):385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.11.005 De Mendonça TG, Lirio VS, Braga MJ, Da Silva OM (2014) Institutions and bilateral agricultural trade. Procedia Econ Financ 14:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00699-6 Dembatapitiya P, Weerahewa J (2015) Effects of regional trading agreements on South Asian trade: a gravity model analysis. Trop Agric Res 26(3):468 Endoh M (1999) Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960–1994. Appl Econ 31(2):207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499324435 Egger PH, Nigai S (2015) Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained ANOVA-type estimation of gravity models. J Int Econ 97(1):86–99 Feenstra R, Markusen J, Rose A (1998) Undertstanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: the role of differentiating goods. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6804 Field AJ (1991) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. By Douglass C. North. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1990, pp. 8:152. 10.95, paper. J Econ History 51(4):999–1001 Francois J, Manchin M (2013) Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Dev 46:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.009 Golovko A, Sahin H (2021) Analysis of international trade integration of EurAsian countries: gravity model approach. Eurasian Econ Rev 11(3):519–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00168-3 Gulnaz S, Manglani H (2022) Does gravity work in the context of India and ASEAN bilateral trade? An application of the FGLS method. Theor Appl Econ 29(1):143–160 Head K, Mayer T (2014) Gravity equations: workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. Handbook of international economics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 131–195 Horsewood N, Voicu AM (2012) Does corruption hinder trade for the new EU members? Economics 6(1):20120047 Iqbal N, Nawaz S (2017) Pakistan’s bilateral trade under MFN and SAFTA: do institutional and non-institutional arrangements matter? Pak Dev Rev 59–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44986516 Islam A, Salim R, Bloch H (2016) Does regional integration affect efficiency and productivity growth? Empirical evidence from South Asia. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 28(2):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12048 Jagdambe S, Kannan E (2020) Effects of ASEAN-India free trade agreement on agricultural trade: the gravity model approach. World Dev Perspect 19:100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100212 Jan WU, Shah M (2019) A gravity model approach towards Pakistan’s bilateral trade with SAARC countries. Comp Econ Res Central East Europe 22(4):23–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0030 Jaumotte F (2004) Foreign direct investment and regional trade agreements: the market size effect revisited. In: IMF working paper: foreign direct investment and regional trade agreements-the market size effect revisited 4(7) Jouanjean MA, Gachassin M, te Velde DW (2016) Regional infrastructure for trade facilitation-effect on growth and poverty reduction. ODI, London Kamal Y, Zaki C (2018) How do technical barriers to trade affect exports? Evidence from Egyptian firm-level data. J Econ Integr 33(4):659–721 Kathuria S, Shahid S (2017) Boosting trade and prosperity in South Asia. In: De P, Rehman M (eds) Regional integration in South Asia: essays in honour of Dr. M. Rahmatullah, 1st edn. KW Publishers Pvt Limited, New Delhi, pp 7–34 Krugman PR (1981) Intraindustry specialisation and the gains from trade. J Polit Econ 89(5):959–973. https://doi.org/10.1086/261015 Kubny J, Molders F, Nunnenkamp P (2011) Regional integration and FDI in emerging markets. Regional integration, economic development and global governance. Edward Elgar Publishing Kumar S, Ahmed S (2015) Gravity model by panel data approach: an empirical application with implications for South Asian countries. Foreign Trade Rev 50(4):233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515598587 Larch M, Wanner J, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2019) Currency unions and trade: A PPML re‐assessment with high‐dimensional fixed effects. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 81(3):487–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12283 Levchenko AA (2007) Institutional quality and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 74(3):791–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00435.x Limao N, Venables AJ (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15(3):451–479 Loganathan S, Karakunnel JJ, Victor V (2020) Analysis of India’s trade patterns and trade possibilities with the European Union. Forum Sci Oecon 8(4):5–25. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL8_NO4_1 Mawusi C (2020) Economic policy uncertainty and international trade: a gravity model approach. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-129375/v1 Meon PG, Sekkat K (2008) Institutional quality and trade: which institutions? Which trade? Econ Inq 46(2):227–240 Mishra AK, Gadhia JN, Kubendran N, Sahoo M (2015) Trade flows between India and other BRICS countries: an empirical analysis using gravity model. Glob Bus Rev 16(1):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914553523 Naanwaab C, Diarrassouba M (2013) The impact of economic freedom on bilateral trade: a cross-country analysis. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res 4(1):668–672 Nawaz S (2015) Growth effects of institutions: a disaggregated analysis. Econ Model 45:118–126 Nawaz S (2020) Institutions, regional integration and bilateral trade in South Asia: PPML based evidence. Pak Dev Rev 59(2):221–242 Nawaz S, Khawaja MI (2019) Fiscal policy, institutions, and growth: new insights. Singap Econ Rev 64(05):1251–1278 Nunn N, Trefler D (2014) Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. Handb Int Econ 4:263–315 Olivero MP, Yotov YV (2012) Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Can J Econ/Rev canadienne d'économique, 45(1):64–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x Parakh Y, Aditya A (2021) Analysing the determinants of trade agreements: a cross country socio-economic-political analysis. Int Trade J. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2021.2007180 Pöyhönen P (1963) A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90:93–100 Raychaudhuri A, Haldar SK (2009) An investigation into the inter-district disparity in West Bengal, 1991–2005. Econ Polit Wkly 44:258–263 Sahu PK, Heng SY (2017) India’s competitive advantage and export performance: a gravity model approach. Arthshastra Indian J Econ Res 6(6):23. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2017/v6i6/120115 Shahriar S, Qian L, Kea S, Abdullahi NM (2019) The gravity model of trade: A theoretical perspective. Rev Innov Compet J Econ Soc Res 5(1):21–42 Sharma V, Kumar V (2021) Trade potential under the SAFTA between India and other SAARC countries: the augmented gravity model approach. Stat Transit New Ser 22(3):81 Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):641–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641 Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2010) Currency unions in prospect and retrospect. Annu Rev Econ 2(1):51–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124508 Silva JMS, Tenreyro S, Windmeijer F (2015) Testing competing models for non-negative data with many zeros. J Econom Methods 4(1):29–46 Timsina KP, Culas RJ (2020) Do free trade agreements increase Australian trade: an application of Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator? J East–West Bus 26(1):56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2019.1685056 Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York Wang J (2006) China, India, and regional economic integration in Asia: The policy and legal dimensions. In: SYBIL, 10, 269. Working Papers 5476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc Wani SH, Mir MA (2023) Import determinants and potential markets of Pakistan: an application of PPML gravity model. Stud Univ Vasile Goldiș Arad Seria Științe Economice 33(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2023-0003 Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2011) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43(6):641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802599784 Yu S, Beugelsdijk S, de Haan J (2015) Trade, trust and the rule of law. Eur J Polit Econ 37:102–115 Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang T (2020) Direct or indirect? The impact of political connections on export mode of Chinese private enterprises. China Econ Rev 61:101434 Zofío JL, Condeço-Melhorado AM, Maroto-Sánchez A, Gutiérrez J (2014) Generalized transport costs and index numbers: a geographical analysis of economic and infrastructure fundamentals. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 67:141–157