India’s trade with South and Central Asia: an application of institution-based augmented gravity model
Tóm tắt
The present study investigates the effect of regional and bilateral trade agreements supported by institutional framework on bilateral trade between India and selected South and Central Asian countries. The augmented gravity model that corrects for zero trade, endogeneity and heterogeneity is used. The model is developed by applying OLS and PPML (Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood) estimation technique using panel dataset of 22 countries from 1996 to 2020. Empirical results show that trade agreements have failed to enhance trade between selected countries. However, institutional framework positively contributes to trade integration among these countries. The key finding of this study is that regional trade agreements supported by institutional framework play an important role in promotion of trade among these countries. Thus, the government needs to pay attention to enhance institutional quality to reap the benefits of trade integration.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acemoglu D, Yared P (2010) Political limits to globalization. Am Econ Rev 100(2):83–88
Akhter N, Ghani E (2010) Regional integration in South Asia: An analysis of trade flows using the gravity model. Pak Dev Rev 105–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41263356
Alvarez IC, Barbero J, Rodríguez-Pose A, Zofío JL (2018) Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Dev 103:72–87
Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1):106–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1802501
Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):342–352. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411587
Anderson JE, Van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
Angkinand AP, Chiu EM (2011) Will institutional reform enhance bilateral trade flows? Analyses from different reform aspects. J Econ Policy Reform 14(3):243–258
Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
Bakhsh S, Yin H, Shabir M, Ali K (2022) China trade with belt and road countries: the role and impact of institutions. China Econ J 15(1):29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1994709
Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67(3):474. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928061
Bergstrand JH (1990) The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model, the linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ J 100(403):1216. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233969
Bown CP (2017) The slow unraveling of US trade policy in the age of Trump (No. 2060-2018-351)
Briggs K (2013) Institutional quality as a barrier to trade. Appl Econ Lett 20(16):1453–1458
Coulibaly S (2004) On the assessment of trade creation and trade diversion effects of developing RTAs. University Lausanne Working paper No45, Lausanne
De Groot HL, Linders GJ, Rietveld P, Subramanian U (2004) The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57(1):103–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x
Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Model Work in a Classical World?. In: Frankel J (ed.) The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago University Press
De Jong E, Bogmans C (2011) Does corruption discourage international trade? Eur J Polit Econ 27(2):385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.11.005
De Mendonça TG, Lirio VS, Braga MJ, Da Silva OM (2014) Institutions and bilateral agricultural trade. Procedia Econ Financ 14:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00699-6
Dembatapitiya P, Weerahewa J (2015) Effects of regional trading agreements on South Asian trade: a gravity model analysis. Trop Agric Res 26(3):468
Endoh M (1999) Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960–1994. Appl Econ 31(2):207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499324435
Egger PH, Nigai S (2015) Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained ANOVA-type estimation of gravity models. J Int Econ 97(1):86–99
Feenstra R, Markusen J, Rose A (1998) Undertstanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: the role of differentiating goods. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6804
Field AJ (1991) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. By Douglass C. North. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1990, pp. 8:152. 10.95, paper. J Econ History 51(4):999–1001
Francois J, Manchin M (2013) Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Dev 46:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.009
Golovko A, Sahin H (2021) Analysis of international trade integration of EurAsian countries: gravity model approach. Eurasian Econ Rev 11(3):519–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00168-3
Gulnaz S, Manglani H (2022) Does gravity work in the context of India and ASEAN bilateral trade? An application of the FGLS method. Theor Appl Econ 29(1):143–160
Head K, Mayer T (2014) Gravity equations: workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. Handbook of international economics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 131–195
Horsewood N, Voicu AM (2012) Does corruption hinder trade for the new EU members? Economics 6(1):20120047
Iqbal N, Nawaz S (2017) Pakistan’s bilateral trade under MFN and SAFTA: do institutional and non-institutional arrangements matter? Pak Dev Rev 59–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44986516
Islam A, Salim R, Bloch H (2016) Does regional integration affect efficiency and productivity growth? Empirical evidence from South Asia. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 28(2):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12048
Jagdambe S, Kannan E (2020) Effects of ASEAN-India free trade agreement on agricultural trade: the gravity model approach. World Dev Perspect 19:100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100212
Jan WU, Shah M (2019) A gravity model approach towards Pakistan’s bilateral trade with SAARC countries. Comp Econ Res Central East Europe 22(4):23–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0030
Jaumotte F (2004) Foreign direct investment and regional trade agreements: the market size effect revisited. In: IMF working paper: foreign direct investment and regional trade agreements-the market size effect revisited 4(7)
Jouanjean MA, Gachassin M, te Velde DW (2016) Regional infrastructure for trade facilitation-effect on growth and poverty reduction. ODI, London
Kamal Y, Zaki C (2018) How do technical barriers to trade affect exports? Evidence from Egyptian firm-level data. J Econ Integr 33(4):659–721
Kathuria S, Shahid S (2017) Boosting trade and prosperity in South Asia. In: De P, Rehman M (eds) Regional integration in South Asia: essays in honour of Dr. M. Rahmatullah, 1st edn. KW Publishers Pvt Limited, New Delhi, pp 7–34
Krugman PR (1981) Intraindustry specialisation and the gains from trade. J Polit Econ 89(5):959–973. https://doi.org/10.1086/261015
Kubny J, Molders F, Nunnenkamp P (2011) Regional integration and FDI in emerging markets. Regional integration, economic development and global governance. Edward Elgar Publishing
Kumar S, Ahmed S (2015) Gravity model by panel data approach: an empirical application with implications for South Asian countries. Foreign Trade Rev 50(4):233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515598587
Larch M, Wanner J, Yotov YV, Zylkin T (2019) Currency unions and trade: A PPML re‐assessment with high‐dimensional fixed effects. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 81(3):487–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12283
Levchenko AA (2007) Institutional quality and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 74(3):791–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00435.x
Limao N, Venables AJ (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15(3):451–479
Loganathan S, Karakunnel JJ, Victor V (2020) Analysis of India’s trade patterns and trade possibilities with the European Union. Forum Sci Oecon 8(4):5–25. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL8_NO4_1
Mawusi C (2020) Economic policy uncertainty and international trade: a gravity model approach. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-129375/v1
Meon PG, Sekkat K (2008) Institutional quality and trade: which institutions? Which trade? Econ Inq 46(2):227–240
Mishra AK, Gadhia JN, Kubendran N, Sahoo M (2015) Trade flows between India and other BRICS countries: an empirical analysis using gravity model. Glob Bus Rev 16(1):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914553523
Naanwaab C, Diarrassouba M (2013) The impact of economic freedom on bilateral trade: a cross-country analysis. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res 4(1):668–672
Nawaz S (2015) Growth effects of institutions: a disaggregated analysis. Econ Model 45:118–126
Nawaz S (2020) Institutions, regional integration and bilateral trade in South Asia: PPML based evidence. Pak Dev Rev 59(2):221–242
Nawaz S, Khawaja MI (2019) Fiscal policy, institutions, and growth: new insights. Singap Econ Rev 64(05):1251–1278
Nunn N, Trefler D (2014) Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. Handb Int Econ 4:263–315
Olivero MP, Yotov YV (2012) Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Can J Econ/Rev canadienne d'économique, 45(1):64–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x
Parakh Y, Aditya A (2021) Analysing the determinants of trade agreements: a cross country socio-economic-political analysis. Int Trade J. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2021.2007180
Pöyhönen P (1963) A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90:93–100
Raychaudhuri A, Haldar SK (2009) An investigation into the inter-district disparity in West Bengal, 1991–2005. Econ Polit Wkly 44:258–263
Sahu PK, Heng SY (2017) India’s competitive advantage and export performance: a gravity model approach. Arthshastra Indian J Econ Res 6(6):23. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2017/v6i6/120115
Shahriar S, Qian L, Kea S, Abdullahi NM (2019) The gravity model of trade: A theoretical perspective. Rev Innov Compet J Econ Soc Res 5(1):21–42
Sharma V, Kumar V (2021) Trade potential under the SAFTA between India and other SAARC countries: the augmented gravity model approach. Stat Transit New Ser 22(3):81
Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):641–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2010) Currency unions in prospect and retrospect. Annu Rev Econ 2(1):51–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124508
Silva JMS, Tenreyro S, Windmeijer F (2015) Testing competing models for non-negative data with many zeros. J Econom Methods 4(1):29–46
Timsina KP, Culas RJ (2020) Do free trade agreements increase Australian trade: an application of Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator? J East–West Bus 26(1):56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2019.1685056
Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York
Wang J (2006) China, India, and regional economic integration in Asia: The policy and legal dimensions. In: SYBIL, 10, 269. Working Papers 5476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Wani SH, Mir MA (2023) Import determinants and potential markets of Pakistan: an application of PPML gravity model. Stud Univ Vasile Goldiș Arad Seria Științe Economice 33(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2023-0003
Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2011) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43(6):641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802599784
Yu S, Beugelsdijk S, de Haan J (2015) Trade, trust and the rule of law. Eur J Polit Econ 37:102–115
Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang T (2020) Direct or indirect? The impact of political connections on export mode of Chinese private enterprises. China Econ Rev 61:101434
Zofío JL, Condeço-Melhorado AM, Maroto-Sánchez A, Gutiérrez J (2014) Generalized transport costs and index numbers: a geographical analysis of economic and infrastructure fundamentals. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 67:141–157