India's Ecocity? Environment, Urbanisation, and Mobility in the Making of Lavasa

SAGE Publications - Tập 30 Số 6 - Trang 982-996 - 2012
Ayona Datta1
1School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England

Tóm tắt

In a context of rapid urbanisation in the Global South the potential of ecocities to provide sustainable development is hotly debated within academic and policy circles. This paper will contribute to this debate by referring to Lavasa, India's largest planned ‘hill city’, a fifth of the size of Mumbai. Mentioned in the influential McKinsey report as an emerging global city, Lavasa, the first ‘sustainable’ city developed in the Mumbai—Pune region, attempts to deal with urbanisation, environment, and migration in very particular ways. Yet, it has been riddled with controversies since its inception, and construction has been interrupted by the courts a number of times for alleged environmental violations. Using Lavasa as an example, I will examine the rise and rise of ecocities in India through their legal and policy context. I will argue that future ecocities in India run the danger of prioritising economic development over environmental sustainability in the absence of strong legal enforcement and monitoring of environmental performance. I conclude that strong environmental policy framing and regulation are crucial in this context if new planned cities in India are to have any potential in addressing the challenges of rapid urbanisation and sustainable development.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anonymous, 2010, Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 7

Bhagat R, 2002, “Challenges of rural-urban classification for decentralised governance” Economic and Political Weekly 22 June, 2413–2416

Biau D, 2007, “Chinese cities, Indian cities: A telling contrast” Economic and Political Weekly 18 August, 3369–3372

Datta A, 2011 Foresight: Migration and Global Environmental Change Government Office for Science, London, volume CS11, pages 1–13, http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/migration/case-studies/11-1162-cs11-review-risks-eco-cities-in-lndia.pdf

Divan S, 2002, Environmental Law and Policy in India

Dyson T, 2005, Twenty-first Century India: Population, Economy Human Development, and the Environment

Fifth Report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development, 2007, Up in Smoke: Asia and the Pacific

Goswami R, 2010, Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 40

Harvey D, 1996, Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference

10.4324/9780203027523

IANS, 2011, “Phase I of Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor by 2018: Sharma”, Indo-Asian News Service, http://www.newkerala.com/news/fullnews99571.htm

Indian Constitution, 1976, “42nd amendment”, http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/coifiles/amendment.htm

Jasanoff S, 1993, “India at the crossroads in global environmental policy” Global Environmental Change March, 32–52

10.2495/SC100211

Kennedy L, 2008, Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 110

10.1177/0956247806063947

Kundu A, 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, 46, 10

Lobo B, 2002, Economic and Political Weekly, 37, 529

McKinsey Global Institute, 2010, India's Urban Awakening: Building Inclusive Cities, Sustaining Economic Growth

10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00343.x

Millennium Project, 2005, “A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals”, http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/reports/fullreport.htm

10.1108/17479894200900011

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 1986, “The Environment (Protection) Act”, http://www.encfor.nic.in/legis/env/eprotect_act_1986.pdf

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 1988, “National Forest Policy”, http://www.MoEEnic.in/downloads/about-the-ministry/introduction-nfp.pdf

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 1992a, “National Conservation Strategy and Policy Statement on Environment and Development”, http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/about-the-ministry/introduction-csps.pdf

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 1992b, “Policy Statement on Abatement of Pollution”, http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/about-the-ministry/introduction-csps.pdf

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 1994, “EIANotification 1994”, http://envfor.nic.in/legis/eia/so-60(e).html

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 2000, “National Agriculture Policy”, http://agricoop.nic.in/agpolicy02.htm

MoEF, Ministry of Environment and Forests 2006, “National Environment Policy”, http://preventionweb.net/go/9133

Mukhopadhyay P, 2009, Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 59

MWR, 2002, “National Water Policy”

NCP, 2000, “National Population Policy”

10.1016/j.eiar.2006.01.004

Planning Commission, 2006, “India's Eleventh Five-Year Plan”

Ramakrishna K, 1985, Ecology Law Quarterly, 12, 907

Register R, 1987, Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future

10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00003-6

Sharma R N, 2001, “Socio-economic survey of developed nodes in Navi Bombay”

Sharma R N, 2003, “Socio-economic survey of post affected families (of 52 villages) for the CIDCO Project in Navi Mumbai”

10.1111/1468-2427.00276

United Nations, 1987, “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development”, General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December, http://www.un.org/documents/ga/ies/42/ores420187.htm

Wilkinson S, 2006, Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India