Inconvenient truths: pluralism, pragmatism, and the need for civil disagreement

Addams J (1902) Democracy and social ethics. Macmillan, New York Agrawal A, Redford K (2009) Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conserv Soc 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.54790 Aladjem TK (1995) Of truth and disagreement: Habermas, Foucault and democratic discourse. Hist Eur Ideas 20:909–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(95)95828-5 Alcoff L (1988) Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: the identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs 13:405–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/494426 Anderson E (2006) The epistemology of democracy. Epistem: J Soc Epistemol 3:8–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/epi.0.0000 Anderson E (2010) The imperative of integration. Princeton University Press, Princeton Baker SH, Fitzpatrick R, Estus E (2017) Nuclear reimagined. Third Way. https://www.thirdway.org/blog/nuclear-reimagined. Accessed 24 June 2019 Berlin I (1991) The pursuit of the ideal. In: The crooked timber of humanity: chapters in the history of ideas, 1st edn. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, pp 1–20 Bernstein RJ (1989) Pragmatism, pluralism and the healing of wounds. Proc Addresses Am Philos Assoc 63:5–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3130079 Bernstein JM, Szuster B, Philips L (2017) Assessing the diversity of contemporary environmentalism: time for a new paradigm. Int J Environ Res 11:641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-017-0056-9 Callicott JB (1980) Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environ Ethics 2:311–338. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19802424 Campbell J (1992) The community reconstructs: the meaning of pragmatic social thought. University of Illinois Press, Urbana Connolly WE (1987) Politics and ambiguity. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Dara SK (2019) The new integrated pest management paradigm for the modern age. J Integr Pest Manag 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmz010 Dewey J (1993) The political writings. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis Dewey C (2017) Pioneers of organic farming are threatening to leave the program they helped create. Wash Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/11/02/pioneers-of-organic-farming-are-threatening-to-leave-the-program-they-helped-create/. Accessed 24 June 2019 Dowie M (2009) Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. MIT Press, Cambridge Dryzek JS (2013) The politics of the earth: environmental discourses, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford Duchovny D, Wyse R (2017) Renewables and nuclear can no longer afford to be foes. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/renewables-and-nuclear-ca_b_13128240. Accessed 24 June 2019 Fehrenbacher K (2017) Nuclear can be friends with renewables—if it’s modular. Greentech Media. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/nuclear-can-be-friends-with-renewables. Accessed 24 June 2019 Fischer F, Forester J (eds) (1993) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham Hetch Hetchy Environmental Debates (2017) National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/legislative/features/hetch-hetchy. Accessed 24 June 2019 Ho J (2014) “Achieving disagreement”: culture wars and competing epistemologies of climate change strategies in the “death of environmentalism” debates. Brown University, undergraduate thesis Hrubovcak J, Vasavada U, Aldy J (1999) Green technologies for a more sustainable agriculture. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=42251. Accessed 24 June 2019 Hull RB (2009) Environmental pluralism. In: Callicott JB, Frodeman R (eds) Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy. Macmillan Reference USA, Detroit, pp 384–387 James W (1909) A pluralistic universe. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, New York Johnson N (2018) When solar and wind need a boost, nuclear might be the best option. Grist. https://grist.org/article/when-solar-and-wind-need-a-boost-nuclear-might-be-the-best-option/. Accessed 24 June 2019 Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14:147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 Kahan DM, Landrum A, Carpenter K et al (2017) Science curiosity and political information processing. Adv Political Psychol 38:179–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12396 Kareiva P, Marvier M, Lalasz R (2012) Conservation in the Anthropocene: beyond solitude and fragility. Breakthr J 2. https://www.thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/conservation-in-the-anthropocene. Accessed 24 June 2019 Kloor K (2015) The battle for the soul of conservation science. Issues in Sci Technol 2. https://www.issues.org/kloor. Accessed 24 June 2019 Kysar DA, Salzman J (2003) Environmental tribalism. Minn Law Rev 87:1099–1137. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/8n4yq Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, Oxford Light A (1996) Compatibilism in political ecology. In: Light A, Katz E (eds) Environmental pragmatism. Routledge, New York, pp 161–186 Light A, Katz E (eds) (1996) Environmental pragmatism. Routledge, New York Mann CC (2018) The wizard and the prophet: two remarkable scientists and their dueling visions to shape tomorrow’s world. Alfred A. Knopf, New York McWilliams J (2009) Are organic veggies better for you? Slate. https://www.slate.com/technology/2009/08/the-organic-vs-conventional-debate-is-getting-us-nowhere.html. Accessed 24 June 2019 Medina J (2013) The epistemology of resistance: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press, Oxford Minteer BA (2006) The landscape of reform: civic pragmatism and environmental thought in America. MIT Press, Cambridge Mumford L (1964) Authoritarian and democratic technics. Technol Cult 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101118 Nisbet MC (2011) Public opinion and participation. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 355–368 Norton BG (1991) Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford University Press, Oxford Peirce CS (1931) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Proctor JD (1998) The social construction of nature: relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 88:352–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105 Pyper J (2017) Why court victories for New York, Illinois nuclear subsidies are a big win for renewables. Greentech Media. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/nuclear-subsidies-court-new-york-illinois-renewable-energy. Accessed 24 June 2019 Rayner S, Malone EL (eds) (1998) Human choice and climate change. Battelle Press, Columbus Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 Rorty R (1999) Philosophy and social hope. Penguin, New York Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Pol 7:385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 Schifeling T, Hoffman AJ (2017) Bill McKibben’s influence on US climate change discourse: shifting field-level debates through radical flank effects. Organ Environ 32:213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617744278 Schlosberg D (1999) Environmental justice and the new pluralism: the challenge of difference for environmentalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford Schwarz M, Thompson M (1990) Divided we stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia Siegel RB (2006) Constitutional culture, social movement conflict and constitutional change: the case of the de facto ERA. Calif Law Rev 94:1323–1420. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38CQ68 Smith MB (1998) The value of a tree: public debates of John Muir and Gifford Pinchot. Hist 60:757–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1998.tb01414.x Tallis H, Lubchenco J (2014) Working together: a call for inclusive conservation. Nat 515:27–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/515027a Taylor PW (1986) Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press, Princeton Thompson M, Rayner S (1998) Risk and governance part I: the discourses of climate change. Gov Oppos 33:139–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1998.tb00787.x Varner GE, Gilbertz SJ, Peterson TR (1996) Teaching environmental ethics as a method of conflict management. In: Light A, Katz E (eds) Environmental pragmatism. Routledge, New York, pp 266–284 Verweij M, Douglas M, Ellis R et al (2006) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Adm 84:817–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1 Wallace RL, Clark SG (2018) Environmental studies and sciences in a time of chaos: problems, contexts, and recommendations. J Environ Stud Sci 8:110–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0469-6 Wayman S, Kucek LK, Mirsky SB et al (2017) Organic and conventional farmers differ in their perspectives on cover crop use and breeding. Renew Agric and Food Syst 32:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170516000338 Winner L (1986) The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Wittwer RA, Dorn B, Jossi W et al (2017) Cover crops support ecological intensification of arable cropping systems. Sci Rep 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41911