Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers

Andrea Cortegiani1, Andrea Manca2, Manoj M. Lalu3, David Moher3
1Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.). Section of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
3Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bagues M, Sylos-Labini M, Zinovyeva N (2019) A walk on the wild side: ‘predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Res Policy 48(2):462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.013

Cortegiani A, Longhini F, Sanfilippo F et al (2019) Predatory open-access publishing in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg 128:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003803

Hedding DW (2019) Payouts push professors towards predatory journals. Nature 565:267. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00120-1

Manca A, Cugusi L, Dvir Z, Deriu F (2017) PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion. Lancet 390:734–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31943-8

Severin A, Low N (2019) Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3