Incidence of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock during corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic

Rodríguez-Leor, 2020, Impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la actividad asistencial en cardiología ntervencionista en España, REC Interv. Cardiol., 2, 82 Garcia, 2020, Reduction in ST-segment elevation cardiac catheterization laboratory activations in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 75, 2871, 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.011 Flensted Lassen, 2020, Aktivitet På Hjerteområdet under COVID-19 Epidemien Særrapport Fra RKKP I Samarbejde Med Vestdansk Hjertedatabase Og, Dansk Hjerteregister. De Rosa, 2020, Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era, Eur. Heart J., 41, 2083, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa409 Tam, 2020, Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care in Hong Kong, China, Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006631 Tam, 2020, Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on outcome of myocardial infarction in Hong Kong, China, Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv., 10.1002/ccd.28943 Hunziker, 2019, Twenty-year trends in the incidence and outcome of cardiogenic shock in AMIS plus registry, Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv., 12, e007293, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007293 Helgestad, 2019, Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study, Eur. J. Heart Fail., 21, 1370, 10.1002/ejhf.1566 Redfors, 2015, 17-year trends in incidence and prognosis of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction in western Sweden, Int. J. Cardiol., 2015, 256, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.106 Welt, 2020, Catheterization laboratory considerations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: from ACC’s interventional council and SCAI, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 75, 2372, 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.021 Yousefzai, 2020, Misdiagnosis in the COVID era: when zebras are everywhere, don’t forget the horses, JACC Case Rep. Schmidt, 2019, The Danish healthcare system and epidemiological research: from healthcare contacts to database records, Clin. Epidemiol., 11, 563, 10.2147/CLEP.S179083 Schmidt, 2014, The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology, Eur. J. Epidemiol., 29, 541, 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 Schmidt, 2015, The danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential, Clin. Epidemiol., 7, 449, 10.2147/CLEP.S91125 Sundboll, 2016, Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study, BMJ Open., 6, e012832, 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832 Lauridsen, 2015, Positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis codes for cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and septic shock in the Danish National Patient Registry, BMC Med. Res. Method., 15, 23, 10.1186/s12874-015-0013-2 Thygesen, 2011, The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients, BMC Med. Res. Method., 11, 83, 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83 Moller, 2005, Work related stressful life events and the risk of myocardial infarction. Case-control and case-crossover analyses within the Stockholm heart epidemiology programme (SHEEP), J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health, 59, 23, 10.1136/jech.2003.019349 Kwong, 2018, Acute myocardial infarction after laboratory-confirmed influenza infection, N. Engl. J. Med., 378, 345, 10.1056/NEJMoa1702090 Tavazzi, 2020, Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock, Eur. J. Heart Fail., 22, 911, 10.1002/ejhf.1828 Long, 2020, Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19, Am. J. Emerg. Med., 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048 Klok, 2020, Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: an updated analysis, Thromb. Res., 191, 148, 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.041 Aissaoui, 2020, Trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, Eur. J. Heart Fail., 22, 664, 10.1002/ejhf.1750 Nguyen, 2017, Year (2001–2011) Trends in the incidence rates and short-term outcomes of early versus late onset cardiogenic shock after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, J. Am. Heart Assoc., 6, 10.1161/JAHA.117.005566 Ostenfeld, 2015, Prognostic implication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction, Resuscitation, 87, 57, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.010 Mahmud, 2020, Management of acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.039 Awad, 2012, Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes: insights from the global registry of acute coronary events, Am. Heart J., 163, 963, 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.003 J. Josiassen, O.K.L. Helgestad, J.E. Møller, J. Kjaergaard, H. Hoejgaard, H. Schmidt, L.O. Jensen, L. Holmvang, H.B. Ravn, C. Hassager, Cardiogenic shock patients: those with and those without out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest are different clinical entities. In: Poster at ESC Congress 2019, Session 2, Acute Cardiac Care - Cardiogenic Shock. Paris; 2019. https://esc365.escardio.org/Congress/ESC-CONGRESS-2019/Poster-Session-2-Cardiogenic-shock/198469-cardiogenic-shock-patients-those-with-and-those-without-out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest-are-different-clinical-entities.