Incidence of Noncompliance and its Influencing Factors in Patients Receiving Digoxin

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 19 - Trang 123-130 - 2012
Takanori Miura1, Ryoji Kojima2, Youji Sugiura1, Masaru Mizutani1, Fumimaro Takatsu3, Yoshio Suzuki2
1Department of Pharmacy Services, Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
2Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan
3Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan

Tóm tắt

Objective: Patient noncompliance with drug therapy is one of the major problems in the successful management of chronic diseases. The present study was designed to clarify the incidence of noncompliance in 843 patients (518 inpatients; 325 outpatients) and its influencing factors in outpatients receiving digoxin for congestive heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation with tachycardia. Patients and Methods: The serum digoxin concentration (SDC) was used to evaluate the medication noncompliance of patients. Patients were defined as noncompliant when their SDC was measured as zero on at least three occasions. Results: The incidence of noncompliance in inpatients and outpatients was 4.2 and 22.2%, respectively. In 55 selected patients who responded to digoxin therapy and showed an attenuation of both tachycardia and the gain in bodyweight, and a disappearance of symptoms of heart failure during their hospitalisation, the incidence of noncompliance was 18.2% 6 months after discharge. All of these noncompliant patients had received nonsurgical treatment. Amongst the entire group of 325 outpatients, the incidence of noncompliance with past surgical treatment was significantly lower than in outpatients without it. Longer office visits, increased number of office visits and better understanding of medication used and illness were associated with a lower incidence of noncompliance in the 325 outpatients. Conclusions: Incidence of noncompliance in outpatients with digoxin therapy is affected by surgical treatment, duration and number of office visits, and understanding of the medication used to treat patients and the illness. Additionally, this result suggests that factors associated with surgical treatment, such as the duration of office visits, may play a significant role in mitigating the rate of noncompliance in outpatients.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Detry J-MR, Block P, De Backer G, et al. Patient compliance and therapeutic coverage: amlodipine versus nifedipine (slow-release) in the treatment of angina pectoris. J Int Med Res 1994; 22: 278–86 Klein LE. Compliance and blood pressure control. Hypertension 1988; 11: 1161–4 Maronde RF, Chan LS, Larsen FJ, et al. Underutilization of antihypertensive drugs and associated hospitalization. Med Care 1989; 27: 1159–66 Smith NA, Seale JP, Ley P, et al. Better medication compliance is associated with improved control of childhood asthma. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1994; 49(6): 470–4 Goodyer LI, Miskelly F, Milligan P. Does encouraging good compliance improve patients’ clinical condition in heart failure? Br J Clin Pract 1995; 49(4): 173–6 Jun F, Akira S, Compliance and compliance-improving strategies in hypertension: the Japanese experience. J Hypertens 1985; 3 Suppl.: S19–22 Weiden P. Advances in neuropsychiatry and psychopharmacology. In: Cramer JA, Spiker B, editors. Compliance in medical practice and clinical trials. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 146–9 Konstam M, Dracup K, Baker D, et al. Heart failure: evaluation and care of patients with left-ventricular systolic dysfunction. Clinical Practice Guideline. No. 11. AHCPR Publication No. 94-0612. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1994 Onesti G, Treatment of mild hypertension and the problem of compliance. Curr Med Res Opin 1983; 8 Suppl. 3: 77–80 Sullivan SD, Kreling DH. Noncompliance with medication regimens and subsequent hospitalization: a literature analysis and cost of hospitalization estimate. J Res Pharm Econ 1990; 2: 19–33 Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Berkman L, et al. Treatment adherence and risk of death after a myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990; 336: 542–5 National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC). Non-compliance with medication regimens: an Economic Tragedy. J Res Pharmaceut Econ 1992; 2: 1–2 Psaty BM, Koepsell TD, Wagner EH, et al. The relative risk of incident coronary heart disease associated with recently stopping the use of beta blockers. JAMA 1992; 263: 1653–7 Wagner EH, Truesdale RA, Warner JT, et al. Compliance treatment practices and blood pressure control: community survey findings. J Chron Dis 1981; 34: 519–25 Logan AG, Achber C, Milne BJ, et al. Work-site treatment of hypertension by specially trained nurses. Lancet 1979; II: 1175–8 Pullar T, Kumar S, Tindall H, et al. Time to stop counting the tablets. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46: 163–8 Spector R, McGrath P, Uretsky N, et al. Does intervention by a nurse improve medication compliance? Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 36–40 Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, et al. The affect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1881–4 Ryohei H, Katsumi M, Michinao M, et al. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters in the Japanese. I. Digoxin. Jpn J Ther Drug Monit 1994; 11: 7–17 Guerrero D, Rudd P, Bryant-Kosling C, et al. Antihypertensive medication-taking. Investigation of a simple regimen. Am J Hypertens 1993; 6: 586–92 Cleland JG, Dargie HJ, Hodsman GP, et al. Captopril in heart failure: a double blind controlled trial. Br Heart J 1984; 52: 530–5 Detry J-MR, Block P, De Backer G, et al. Patient compliance and therapeutic coverage: compliance of amlodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 47: 477–81 Cowley AJ, Stainer K, Wynne RD, et al. Symptomatic assessment of patients with heart failure: double-blind comparison of increasing doses of diuretics and captopril in moderate heart failure. Lancet 1986; II: 770–2