Incidence and post-pollination mechanisms of nonrandom mating in Arabidopsis thaliana

Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen HM, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, Gadrinab C, Heller C, Jeske A, Koesema E, Meyers CC, Parker H, Prednis L, Ansari Y, Choy N, Deen H, Geralt M, Hazari N, Hom E, Karnes M, Mulholland C, Ndubaku R, Schmidt I, Guzman P, Aguilar-Henonin L, Schmid M, Weigel D, Carter DE, Marchand T, Risseeuw E, Brogden D, Zeko A, Crosby WL, Berry CC, Ecker JR (2003) Genome-wide Insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301:653–657 Armbruster WS, Rogers DG (2004) Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? Am J Bot 91:1939–1943 Balasubramanian S, Schwartz C, Singh A, Warthmann N, Kim MC, Maloof JN, Loudet O, Trainer GT, Tsegaye D, Borevitz JO, Chory J, Weigel D (2009) QTL mapping in new Arabidopsis thaliana advanced intercross-recombinant inbred lines. PLoS One 4:4318 Bowman RN (1987) Cryptic self-incompatibility and the breeding system of Clarkia–Unguiculata (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 74:471–476 Charlesworth D, Schemske DW, Sork VL (1987) The evolution of plant reproductive characters; sexual versus natural selection. Experientia Suppl 55:317–335 Cruzan MB (1993) Analysis of pollen-style interactions in Petunia-Hybrida—the determination of variance in male reproductive success. Sex Plant Reprod 6:275–281 Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH (1993) Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia-Paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925–934 Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH (1996) Postpollination mechanisms influencing mating patterns and fecundity: An example from Eichhornia paniculata. American Naturalist 147:576–598 deNettancourt D (1997) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sex Plant Reprod 10:185–199 Haileselassie T, Mollel M, Skogsmyr I (2005) Effects of nutrient level on maternal choice and siring success in Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae). Evol Ecol 19:275–288 Hiscock SJ, Tabah DA (2003) The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1037–1045 Hua ZH, Fields A, Kao TH (2008) Biochemical models for S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Mol Plant 1:575–585 Kay KM, Schemske DW (2008) Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 62:2628–2642 Kermicle JL, Evans MMS (2005) Pollen-pistil barriers to crossing in maize and teosinte result from incongruity rather than active rejection. Sex Plant Reprod 18:187–194 Levin DA (1975) Gamete competition in plants and animals. North Holland, Amsterdam Lister C, Dean C (1993) Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 4:745–750 Loudet O, Chaillou S, Camilleri C, Bouchez D, Daniel-Vedele F (2002) Bay-0 × Shahdara recombinant inbred line population: a powerful tool for the genetic dissection of complex traits in Arabidopsis. Theor Appl Genet 104:1173–1184 Marshall DL, Diggle PK (2001) Mechanisms of differential pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 88:242–257 Marshall DL, Folsom MW (1991) Mate choice in plants—an anatomical to population perspective. Ann Rev Ecol System 22:37–63 Marshall DL, Fuller OS (1994) Does nonrandom mating among wild radish plants occur in the field as well as in the greenhouse. Am J Bot 81:439–445 Mulcahy DL (1979) Rise of the Angiosperms—genecological factor. Science 206:20–23 Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 Nasrallah JB (2002) Recognition and rejection of self in plant reproduction. Science 296:305–308 Palanivelu R, Preuss D (2006) Distinct short-range ovule signals attract or repel Arabidopsis thaliana pollen tubes in vitro. BMC Plant Biology 6:7 Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen P, Kapyla M, Blom A (1999) Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytol 143:243–251 Pfahler PL (1967) Fertilization ability of maize pollen grains. 2. Pollen genotype female sporophyte and pollen storage interactions. Genetics, 57. pp 513–521 Quesada M, Schlichting CD, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (1991) Effects of genotype on pollen performance in cucurbita-pepo. Sex Plant Reprod 4:208–214 Sarigorla M, Pe ME, Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E (1992) Genetic dissection of pollen competitive ability in maize. Heredity 69:423–430 Shaner MGM, Marshall DL (2003) Under how wide a set of conditions will nonrandom mating occur in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae)? Am J Bot 90:1604–1611 Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evol Ecol Res 1:971–985 Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (2002) Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants. Biol Rev 77:537–562 Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767 Snow AA (1991) Effects of pollen-load size on sporophyte competitive ability in 2 Epilobium Species. Am Midl Nat 125:348–355 Snow AA (1994) Postpollination selection and male fitness in plants. Am Nat 144:S69–S83 Snow AA, Spira TP (1991a) Differential pollen-tube growth-rates and nonrandom fertilization in Hibiscus Moscheutos (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 78:1419–1426 Snow AA, Spira TP (1991b) Pollen vigor and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796–797 Snow AA, Spira TP (1996) Pollen-tube competition and male fitness in Hibiscus moscheutos. Evolution 50:1866–1870 Stephenson AG, Bertin RI (1983) Mate competition, female choice and sexual selection in plants. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando Takayama S, Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 56:467–489 Wheeler MJ, Franklin-Tong VE, Franklin FCH (2001) The molecular and genetic basis of pollen-pistil interactions. New Phytol 151:565–584 Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants. Princeton University Press, Princeton