Incentives, Morality, Or Habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes With the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis

Environment and Behavior - Tập 35 Số 2 - Trang 264-285 - 2003
Sebastian Bamberg1, Peter Schmidt2
1U Giessen, Depts of Psychology & Social Science, Giessen, Germany
2U Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Tóm tắt

The predictive power of the Ajzen, Triandis, and Schwartz models are compared in the context of car use for university routes. Two hundred fifty-four students filled out a questionnaire designed to measure the components of the three models. In the prediction of intention to use a car, results indicated that one variable from the Trinandis model—role beliefs—increased the explanatory power offered by the components of the Ajzen model. In the prediction of self-reported car use, one variable of the Triandis model—car use habit—significantly increased the predictive power of the Ajzen model. The central variable of the Schwartz model—personal norm—exerted no significant effect either on intention or on behavior. The implications of the findings for interventions to reduce the car use of students for university routes are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

10.1002/mar.4220110403

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02474.x

10.1177/104346398010002005

10.1023/A:1006391723214

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01063.x

10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3

10.1097/00043764-199007000-00013

Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00506.x

10.1016/0921-3449(90)90022-V

10.1177/074391569101000206

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00086.x

10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87

Gold, R.S. (1993). On the need to mind the gap: On-line versus off-line cognitions underlying sexual risk-taking. In D. Terry, C. Gallois, & M. McCamish (Eds.), The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AIDS-preventive behavior (pp. 227-252). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

Goldenhar, L.M. & Connell, C.M. (1993). Understanding and predicting recycling behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Environmental Systems, 22, 91-103.

Gollwitzer, P.M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 141-185). New York: John Wiley.

Granzin, K.L. & Olsen, J.E. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 1-27.

Hines, J., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.

10.1177/0013916591232004

10.1177/0013916593251004

10.2307/2786363

Jackson, A.L., Olsen, J.E., Granzin, K.L. & Burns, A.C. (1993). An investigation of determinants of recycling consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 481-487.

Jones, R.E. (1990). Understanding paper recycling in an institutionally supportive setting: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Environmental Systems, 19, 307-321.

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00850.x

10.1002/mar.4220110404

10.1177/0013916583152001

10.1016/0277-9536(91)90153-4

10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01053.x

Rogers, R.W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J.R. Cacioppo & R.E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychology: A sourcebook (pp. 153-176). New York: Guilford.

10.1177/109019817400200405

Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). San Diego: Academic Press.

Schwartz, S.H. & Howard, J.A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J.P. Rushton & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01167.x

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02045.x

Steg, L. & Tertoolen, G. (1999). Sustainable transport policy: The contribution from behavioral scientists. Public Money & Management, 1, 63-69.

Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. & Black, J.S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00651.x

Triandis, H.C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Triandis, H.C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H.E. Howe & M.M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979 (pp. 195-259). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Valois, P., Desharnais, R. & Godin, G. (1988). A comparison of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitudinal models for the prediction of exercise intention and behavior. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 459-472.

Verhoef, E.T. (1994). External effects and social costs of road transport. Transportation Research, 28A, 273-287.

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01160.x

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00583.x

10.1177/0013916590221003

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01758.x

10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.498