Incentive and informational properties of preference questions

Adamowicz W, Louviere J and Williams M (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference measures for valuing environmental amenities. J Environ Econ Manage 26: 271–292

Alberini A (1995). Efficiency vs. bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models. J Environ Econ Manage 29: 169–180

Alberini A, Kanninen B and Carson RT (1997). Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Econ 73: 309–324

Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R and Schuman H (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614

Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Turner RK and Willis KG (1995). Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecol Econ 12: 161–179

Bateman IJ, Munro A, Rhodes B, Starmer C and Sugden R (1997). Does part-whole bias exist?: an experimental investigation. Econ J 107: 322–332

Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann WM, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R and Swanson J (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Northamptonm, MA

Becker GM, DeGroot MH and Marschak J (1964). Measuring utility by a single response sequential method. Behav Sci 9: 226–232

Bergstrom T, Blume L and Varian H (1986). On the private provision of public goods. J Public Econ 29: 2–49

Bishop RC and Heberlein TA (1979). Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased. Am J Agric Econ 61: 926–930

Bishop RC, Heberlein TA (1990) The contingent valuation method. In: Johnson RL, Johnson GV (eds) Economic valuation of natural resources: issues, theory and applications. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M and Louviere J (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol Econ 18: 243–253

Boyle KJ, Bishop RC and Welsh MP (1985). Starting point bias in contingent valuation bidding games. Land Econ 61: 188–194

Boyle KJ, Johnson FR, McCollum D, Desvousges WH, Dunford RW and Hudson SP (1996). Valuing public goods: discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses. Land Econ 72: 381–396

Brookshire DS, Ives BC and Schulze WD (1976). The valuation of aesthetic preferences. J Environ Econ Manag 3: 325–346

Burton AC, Carson KS, Chilton SM and Hutchinson WG (2003). An experimental investigation of explanations for inconsistencies in responses to second offers in double referenda. J Environ Econ Manage 46: 472–489

Cameron TA (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. J Environ Econ Manage 15: 355–379

Cameron TA and Huppert DD (1991). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resources values with payment card interval data. J Environ Econ Manage 17: 230–246

Cameron TA and Quiggin J (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a ‘dichotomous choice with follow-up’ questionnaire. J Environ Econ Manage 27: 218–234

Carlsson F and Martinsson P (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?: application to the valuation of the environment. J Environ Econ Manage 41: 179–192

Carson RT (1985) Three essays on contingent valuation. Unpublished Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Carson RT, Steinberg D (1990) Experimental design for discrete choice voter preference surveys. In: 1989 Proceeding of the survey methodology section of the American Statistical Association. American Statistical Association, Washington

Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Mitchell RC (1987) The use of simulated political markets to value public goods. Discussion paper 87–7, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego

Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Kopp RJ, Krosnick JA, Mitchell RC, Presser S, Ruud PA, Smith VK (1994) Prospective interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California Bight. Report to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Carson RT, Flores NE, Martin KM and Wright JL (1996). Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Econ 72: 80–99

Carson RT, Groves T, Machina MJ (1997) Stated preference questions: context and optimal response. Paper presented at the National science foundation preference elicitation symposium, University of California, Berkeley

Carson RT, Groves T, List J (2004) Probabilistic influence and supplemental benefits: a field test of the two key assumptions behind using stated preferences. Paper presented at the European association of environmental and resource economists, Budapest, June

Champ PA and Bishop RC (2006). Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format?. Land Econ 82: 162–173

Champ PA, Bishop RC, Brown TC and McCollum DW (1997). Using donation mechanism to value nonuse benefits from public goods. J Environ Econ Manage 33: 151–162

Chapman RG and Staelin R (1982). Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J Market Res 19: 281–299

Cronin FJ (1982) Valuing nonmarket goods through contingent markets. Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Battelle Memorial Institute, Richmond, Washington

Cummings RG and Taylor LO (1998). Does realism matter in contingent valuation surveys?. Land Econ 74: 203–215

Cummings RG, Harrison GW and Rutström EE (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: is the dichotomous choice approach incentive compatible. Am Econ Rev 85: 260–266

Cummings RG, Elliott S, Harrison GW and Murphy J (1997). Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible?. J Polit Econ 105: 609–621

Farmer MC, Randall A (1996) Referendum voting strategies and implications for follow-up open-ended responses. Paper presented at the annual U.S.D.A. W-133 meeting, Jekyll Island, GA

Farquharson R (1969). Theory of voting. Yale University Press, New Haven

Foster V, Bateman IJ and Harley D (1997). Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: a non-experimental comparison. J Agric Econ 48: 123–138

Freeman A (1991). Indirect methods for valuing changes in environmental risks with non-expected utility preferences. J Risk Uncertain 4: 153–165

Gibbard A (1973). Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 41: 587–601

Green JR and Laffont JJ (1978). A sampling approach to the free rider problem. In: Sandmo, A (eds) Essays in public economics, pp. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA

Green DP, Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D and McFadden DL (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resour Energy Econ 20: 85–116

Greenhalgh C (1986). Research for new product development. In: Worcester, RM and Downham, J (eds) Consumer market research handbook, pp. Amsterdam, North-Holland

Grether DM and Plott CR (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. Am Econ Rev 69: 623–638

Groves T (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41: 617–631

(1987). Information, incentives and economic mechanisms: essays in honor of Leonid Hurwicz. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

Haab TC and McConnell KE (1997). Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions. J Environ Econ Manage 32: 251–270

Haab TC and McConnell KE (1998). Referendum models and economic values: theoretical, intuitive and practical bounds on willingness to pay. Land Econ 74: 216–229

Haab TC and McConnell KE (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton

Haab TC, Huang JC and Whitehead JC (1999). Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible?: a comment. J Polit Econ 107: 186–196

Hanemann WM (1984). Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52: 541–561

Hanemann WM (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation: experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66: 335–379

Hanemann WM (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?. Am Econ Rev 81: 635–647

Hanemann WM and Kanninen B (1999). The statistical analysis of discrete-response. In: Bateman, I and Willis, K (eds) Valuing the environment preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EC and developing countries, pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Hanemann WM, Loomis J and Kanninen B (1991). Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 73: 1255–1263

(1993). Contingent valuation: a critical assessment. Amsterdam, North-Holland

Hausman JA and Ruud P (1987). Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. J Economet 34: 83–104

Hensher DA (1994). Stated preference analysis of travel choice—the state of practice. Transportation 21: 107–133

Herriges JA and Shogren JF (1996). Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. J Environ Econ Manage 30: 112–131

Hoehn J and Randall A (1987). A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 14: 226–247

Holt CA (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. Am Econ Rev 76: 508–515

Horowitz JK (2006). The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. Econ Lett 93: 6–11

Hurwicz L (1986). Incentive aspects of decentralization. In: Arrow, KJ and Intriligator, MD (eds) Handbook of mathematical economics, vol. III., pp. Amsterdam, North-Holland

Inforsino WJ (1986). Forecasting new product sales from likelihood of purchase ratings (with discussion). Market Sci 5: 372–390

Johannesson M, Liljas B and Johansson PO (1998). An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Appl Econ 30: 643–647

Johnson FR and Desvousges WH (1997). Estimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: environmental, health and employment effects of energy programs. J Environ Econ Manage 34: 79–99

Kahneman D, Slovic P and Tversky A (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York

Karni E and Safra Z (1987). Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica 55: 675–685

Kriström B (1990). A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Econ 66: 135–139

Kriström B (1997). The practical problems of contingent valuation. In: Kopp, RJ, Pommerhene, WW and Schwartz, N (eds) Determining the value of non-marketed goods, pp. Kluwer, Boston

Lankford RH (1985). Preferences of citizens for public expenditures on elementary and secondary education. J Econo 27: 1–20

Lavrakas PJ and Traugott MW (2000). Election polls, the news media and democracy. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington

Lohmann S (1994). Information aggregation through costly political action. Am Econ Rev 84: 518–530

Louviere JJ (1994). Conjoint analysis. In: Bagozzi, R (eds) Handbook of marketing research, pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Louviere JJ, Hensher DA and Swait JD (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, New York

Lunander A (1998). Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation format. J Environ Econ Manage 35: 88–102

Lupia A (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias—information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. Am Polit Sci Rev 88: 63–76

Machina MJ (1995). Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm. Geneva Papers Risk Insur Theory 20: 9–50

Magat WA, Viscusi WK and Huber J (1988). Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 15: 395–411

McConnell KE (1990). Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 18: 19–34

McDowell I and Newell C (1996). Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York

McFadden D (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P (eds) Frontiers in econometrics, pp. Academic Press, New York

McFadden D (1980). Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J Bus 53: S13–S29

McFadden D (1994). Contingent valuation and social choice. Am J Agric Econ 76: 689–708

McFadden D (1999). Rationality for economists. J Risk Uncertain 19: 73–105

McLeod DM and Bergland O (1999). Willingness-to-pay estimates using the double-bounded dichotomous-choice contingent valuation format: a test for validity and precision in a Bayesian framework. Land Econ 75: 115–125

Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1986) The use of contingent valuation data for benefit-cost analysis in water pollution control. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mitchell RC and Carson RT (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

Moulin H (1994). Social choice. In: Aumann, RJ and Hart, S (eds) Handbook of game theory with economic applications, pp. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Neil H, Cummings RG, Ganderton PT and Harrison GW (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Econ 70: 145–154

Payne S (1951). The art of asking questions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

(2006). Environmental valuation in developed countries: case studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

Pearce DW and Markandya A (1989). Environmental policy benefits: monetary evaluation. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

(2002). Valuing the environment in developing countries. Edward Elgar, Northampton

Pearce DW, Atkinson G and Mourato S (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

Peterson GL and Brown TC (1998). Economic valuation by the method of paired comparison, with emphasis on evaluation of the transitivity axiom. Land Econ 74: 240–261

Popkin S (1991). The reasoning voter. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Posavac SS (1998). Strategic overbidding in contingent valuation: stated economic value of public goods varies according to consumers’ expectations of funding source. J Econ Psychol 19: 205–214

Rabin M (1998). Psychology and economics. J Econ Liter 36: 11–46

Randall A (1994). A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Econ 70: 88–96

Randall A, Ives BC and Eastman C (1974). Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. J Environ Econ Manage 1: 132–149

Richer J (1995). Willingness to pay for desert protection. Contemp Econ Policy 13: 93–104

Romer T and Rosenthal H (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas and the status quo. Public Choice 33: 27–43

Rowe RD, Schulze WD and Breffle W (1996). A test for payment card biases. J Environ Econ Manage 31: 178–185

Ruud PA (1983). Sufficient conditions for the consistency of maximum likelihood estimation despite misspecification of the distribution in multinomial choice models. Econometrica 51: 225–228

Samuelson PA (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev Econ Stat 36: 387–389

Satterthwaite M (1975). Strategy-proofness and arrow conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and welfare functions. J Econ Theory 10: 187–217

Scott A (1965). The valuation of game resources: some theoretical aspects.Can Fish Rep 4: 27–47

Seip K and Strand J (1992). Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: a CV study with real payment. Environ Resour Econ 2: 91–106

Smith VK and Desvousges WH (1986). Measuring water quality benefits. Kluwer, Boston

Sudman S, Bradburn NM and Schwarz N (1996). Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

Sugden R (1999). Alternatives to the neo-classical theory of choice. In: Bateman, IJ and Willis, KG (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU and developing countries, pp. Oxford University Press, New York

Swait J and Louviere JJ (1993). The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of generalized extreme value models. J Market Res 30: 305–314

Tversky A, Slovic P and Kahneman D (1990). The causes of preference reversal. Am Econ Rev 80: 204–217

Varian H (1992). Microeconomic analysis. Norton, New York

Vickery W (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16: 8–37

Vossler CA, Kerkvliet J, Polasky S and Gainutdinova O (2003). Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon. J Econ Behav Organ 51: 261–277