In the eye of the beholder: The relationship between perceived peer language skills, provided peer feedback and peer grading in secondary education

Aben, 2019, Embracing errors for learning: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in feedback provision and processing in dyadic interactions, 107 Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.W., & Ufer, S. (2016, June). Exploring the composition process of peer feedback. In C.-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016 (Vol. 2, pp. 862–865). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Alqassab, 2018, The impact of peer solution quality on peer-feedback provision on geometry proofs: Evidence from eye-movement analysis, Learning and Instruction, 58, 182, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003 Alqassab, 2018, Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: Role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 11, 10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 Anseel, 2015, How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior, Journal of Management, 41, 318, 10.1177/0149206313484521 Baird, J.R., & Northfield, J.R.. (Eds.). (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Australia: Monash Print Services. Back, 2010, The social relations model: How to understand dyadic processes, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.x Berndt, 2018, Effects of written peer-feedback content and sender’s competence on perceptions, performance, and mindful cognitive processing, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 31, 10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z Black, 1998, Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7 Boud, 2013, Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698, 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 Browne, W.J. (2015). MCMC estimation in MLwiN. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 20, 328, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 Cowan, 2010, Developing the ability for making evaluative judgements, Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 323, 10.1080/13562510903560036 Cohen, 1988 Davies, 2006, Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43, 69, 10.1080/14703290500467566 Double, 2020, The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies, Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481, 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 Dunlap, 2003, Preparing students for lifelong learning: A review of instructional features and teaching methodologies, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16, 6, 10.1111/j.1937-8327.2003.tb00276.x Esterhazy, 2019, Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments, Studies in Higher Education, 44, 260, 10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249 Ertmer, 2007, Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 412, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x Farrah, 2012, The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron University students, An-Najah University Journal for Research, 26, 179 Finkelstein, 2017, When friends exchange negative feedback, Motivation and Emotion, 41, 69, 10.1007/s11031-016-9589-z Gan, 2014, Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task, Instructional Science, 42, 861, 10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 Gielen, M. (2016). The impact of structuring peer feedback in a wiki-based CSCL environment on performance and feedback content. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Graham, 2007, A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 Greguras, 2001, Applying the social relations model to self and peer evaluations, Journal of Management Development, 20, 508, 10.1108/02621710110399792 Harlen, 2006, The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning, 61 Hattie, 2007, The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77, 81, 10.3102/003465430298487 Hoogeveen, 2013, What works in writing with peer response? A review of intervention studies with children and adolescents, Educational Psychology Review, 25, 473, 10.1007/s10648-013-9229-z Hospel, 2016, Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis, Learning and Instruction, 41, 1, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001 Ilgen, 1979, Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349, 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349 Keh, 1990, Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation, ELT Journal, 44, 294, 10.1093/elt/44.4.294 Kenny, 2011, Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling, 335 Krippendorff, 2004, Reliability in content analysis, Human Communication Research, 30, 411 Lai, 2015, An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices, Computers & Education, 85, 149, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011 Levy, 2004, The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future, Journal of Management, 30, 881, 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005 Li, 2016, Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 245, 10.1080/02602938.2014.999746 Liu, 2001, Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer, IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 246, 10.1109/13.940995 Luo, 2014, Peer grading in a MOOC: Reliability, validity, and perceived effects, Online Learning Journal, 18, 1 Mahoney, 2019, A qualitative synthesis of video feedback in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 24, 157, 10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457 Murphy, 1995 Meestringa, 2013, Het schoolexamen Nederlands havo/vwo in kaart, Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 14, 11 Narciss, 2008, Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks, 125 O'Keefe, 2003, Colloquy: Should familywise alpha be adjusted? Against familywise alpha adjustment, Human Communication Research, 29, 431 Panadero, 2013, The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 195, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005 Pander Maat, 2014, T-Scan: A new tool for analyzing Dutch text, Computational Linguistics in The Netherlands Journal, 4, 53 Patchan, 2013, The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions, Instructional Science, 41, 381, 10.1007/s11251-012-9236-3 Rasbash, 2019 Rijlaarsdam, 2008, Observation of peers in learning to write: Practice and Research, Journal of Writing Research, 1, 53, 10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.3 Rotsaert, T. (2017). The social nature of peer assessment in secondary and higher education: examining students’ perceptions on interpersonal processes and peer feedback quality in anonymous face-to-face settings using Mobile Response Technology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Sadler, 1998, Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77 Sebastian, 2008, Development of the self-concept during adolescence, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 441, 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008 Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer assessment skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, the Netherlands. Snijders, 2012 Steelman, 2004, The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 165, 10.1177/0013164403258440 Stemler, 2015, Content analysis, 1 Strijbos, 2006, Content analysis: What are they talking about, Computers & Education, 46, 29, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002 Strijbos, 2014, Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess, 87 Strijbos, 2010, Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency, Learning and Instruction, 20, 291, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 Strijbos, J.W., Van Goozen, B., & Prins, F. (2012, August). Developing a coding scheme for analysing peer feedback messages. Paper presented at the EARLI-SIG 1 Assessment and Evaluation Conference, Brussels, Belgium. Tabachnick, 2013 Thorndike, 1920, A constant error in psychological ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25, 10.1037/h0071663 Topping, 1998, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249 Tsivitanidou, 2011, Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills, Learning and Instruction, 21, 506, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.002 Van der Aar, 2018, The development of self-views across adolescence: Investigating self-descriptions with and without social comparison using a novel experimental paradigm, Cognitive Development, 48, 256, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.10.001 Vandermeulen, N. (2018, August). How and how well do Dutch secondary students write? A national baseline study on synthesis writing. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG Writing Conference, Antwerp, Belgium. Van der Pol, 2008, The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education, Computers & Education, 51, 1804e1817, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001 Van Popta, 2017, Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider, Educational Research Review, 20, 24, 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 Van Steendam, 2010, The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL, Learning and Instruction, 20, 316, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009 Winder, 2016, Writing centre tutoring sessions: Addressing students’ concerns, Educational Studies, 42, 323, 10.1080/03055698.2016.1193476 Winstone, N.E., & Boud, D. (in press). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687. Winstone, 2019 Yang, 2010, Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing, Computers & Education, 55, 1202, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017 Zou, 2018, Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 800, 10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872