In search of the good dam: contemporary views on dam planning in Latin America

Sustainability Science - Tập 16 Số 1 - Trang 255-269 - 2021
Christopher Schulz1, William M. Adams1
1Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractDam planning and construction is notoriously difficult. It is highly complex, involving a multitude of social, environmental, economic and technological questions that often become politicised in the process; negative impacts are often concentrated on small, vulnerable groups within society, while the benefits are typically spread in a much more diffuse pattern; it requires changing riverine ecosystems, often irreversibly so; and it takes a very long time, with often harsh consequences if mistakes are made. These challenges have generated decades of debate around dams and development, yet it is not clear how dam planning and management can be improved. To address this question, the present study used Q methodology to analyse the views of social and environmental researchers on dams in Latin America on the principles that should guide dam development. The Q analysis rendered three idealised viewpoints: The first suggested that defending the rights of vulnerable people should be the main priority, as a counterbalance to the natural bias towards economically and politically powerful actors within the political economy of dam construction. The second implied adoption of a holistic and scientific vision towards dam decision-making and a focus of efforts on perfecting formal procedures and participatory processes to build better dams in the future. The third called into question the need for dams altogether and concentrated attention on invisible and overlooked aspects of dam decision-making, particularly past injustices, and the rights of indigenous communities to determine their own model of development. Each viewpoint represents an alternative vision for future dam planning and clarifies the choices available to policy-makers and development actors. Moreover, viewpoints give insights into the motivations of those who seek to inform debates on dams and development. While they were identified in the context of dam-decision making, our findings may also be relevant to other fields of sustainable development.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbink J (2012) Dam controversies: contested governance and developmental discourse on the Ethiopian Omo River dam. Soc Anthropol Anthropol Soc 20(2):125–144

Adams WM (2007) Thinking like a human: social science and the two cultures problem. Oryx 41(3):275–276

Adams WM (2020) Green development: environment and sustainability in a developing world, 4th edn. Routledge, London

Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2014) Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy 69:43–56

Athayde S, Mathews M, Bohlman S, Brasil W, Doria CRC, Dutka-Gianelli J, Fearnside PM, Loiselle B, Marques EE, Melis TS, Millikan B, Moretto EM, Oliver-Smith A, Rossete A, Vacca R, Kaplan D (2019) Mapping research on hydropower and sustainability in the Brazilian Amazon: advances, gaps in knowledge and future directions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 37:50–69

Beattie J (2002) Dam building, dissent and development: the emergence of the Three Gorges Project. N Z J Asian Stud 4(1):138–158

Blanc J (2018) Itaipu’s forgotten history: the 1965 Brazil–Paraguay border crisis and the new geopolitics of the Southern Cone. J Latin Am Stud 50(2):383–409

Borgias SL (2018) “Subsidizing the State:” the political ecology and legal geography of social movements in Chilean water governance. Geoforum 95:87–101

Briscoe J (2010) Overreach and response: the politics of the WCD and its aftermath. Water Altern 3(2):399–415

Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven

Calheiros DF, Ikeda Castrilon SK, Bampi AC (2018) Hidrelétricas nos rios formadores do Pantanal: ameaças à conservação e às relações socioambientais e econômicas pantaneiras tradicionais. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais 9(1):119–139

Colligan RC, Offord KP, Malinchoc M, Schulman P, Seligman MEP (1994) Caveing the MMPI for an optimism-pessimism scale: Seligman’s attributional model and the assessment of explanatory style. J Clin Psychol 50(1):71–95

Corson C, MacDonald KI, Neimark B (2013) Grabbing “green”: markets, environmental governance and the materialization of natural capital. Hum Geogr 6(1):1–15

Couto TBA, Olden JD (2018) Global proliferation of small hydropower plants—science and policy. Front Ecol Environ 16(2):91–100

Cox KR (1998) Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geogr 17(1):1–23

Cuadra Montoya X (2015) Conflictos ambientales en territorios indígenas y el rol de la reivindicación por el consentimiento libre, previo e informado: un análisis del caso Neltume en Chile. Justiça do Direito 29(2):294–312

Del Bene D, Scheidel A, Temper L (2018) More dams, more violence? A global analysis on resistances and repression around conflictive dams through co-produced knowledge. Sustain Sci 13(3):617–633

Dixit A, Gyawali D (2010) Nepal’s constructive dialogue on dams and development. Water Altern 3(2):106–123

Erlewein A (2014) The promotion of dams through the Clean Development Mechanism: between sustainable climate protection and carbon colonialism. In: Nüsser M (ed) Large dams in Asia: contested environments between technological hydroscapes and social resistance. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 149–168

Evans S (2019) Dams in the desert: an environmental and agricultural history of water in Sonora, Mexico. Glob Environ 12(1):182–205

Fox JA, Brown LD (eds) (1998) The struggle for accountability: the World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements. MIT Press, Cambridge

Franco Moreira P, Kishen Gamu J, Aoki Inoue CY, Athayde S, da Cal Seixas SR, Viola E (2019) South-South transnational advocacy: mobilizing against Brazilian dams in the Peruvian Amazon. Glob Environ Politics 19(1):77–98

Frankfurt HG (1958) Peirce’s notion of abduction. J Philos 55(14):593–597

Freitas CM, Barcellos C, Asmus CIRF, da Silva MA, Xavier DR (2019) From Samarco in Mariana to Vale in Brumadinho: mining dam disasters and public health. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 35(5):e00052519

Fukuyama F (2018) Against identity politics: the new tribalism and the crisis of democracy. Foreign Aff 97:90–114

Gagnon L, Klimpt J-É, Seelos K (2002) Comparing recommendations from the World Commission on Dams and the IEA initiative on hydropower. Energy Policy 30(14):1299–1304

Garcia LC, Ribeiro DB, de Oliveira Roque F, Ochoa-Quintero JM, Laurance WF (2017) Brazil’s worst mining disaster: corporations must be compelled to pay the actual environmental costs. Ecol Appl 27(1):5–9

Haas L, Skinner J, Soanes M (2015) Hydropower sustainability assessments can unlock carbon financing. IIED Briefing Paper, IIED, London

Hall A, Branford S (2012) Development, dams and Dilma: the saga of Belo Monte. Crit Sociol 38(6):851–862

Hay M, Skinner J, Norton A (2019) Dam-induced displacement and resettlement: a literature review. FutureDAMS Working Paper 004, The University of Manchester, Manchester

Hernando-Arrese M, Tironi M (2019) Worlding hydropower: river realities in the Chilean Patagonia. Tapuya 2(1):295–309

Hess CEE, Fenrich E (2017) Socio-environmental conflicts on hydropower: the São Luiz do Tapajós project in Brazil. Environ Sci Policy 73:20–28

Howe C (2015) Latin America in the Anthropocene: energy transitions and climate change mitigations. J Latin Am Caribb Anthropol 20(2):231–241

Huber A, Gorostiza S, Kotsila P, Beltrán MJ, Armiero M (2017) Beyond “socially constructed” disasters: re-politicizing the debate on large dams through a political ecology of risk. Capital Nat Soc 28(3):48–68

International Hydropower Association (2018) Hydropower sustainability assessment protocol. IHA, London

Jensen CB (2017) Mekong scales: domains, test sites, and the uncommons. Anthropologica 59(2):204–215

Johnston BR (2004) “Reparations for dam-displaced communities?” Report from the Chixoy Dam Legacy Issues Meeting, July 25, 2003, Pacux, Guatemala. Capital Nat Social 15(1):113–119

Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

Kapitan T (1992) Peirce and the autonomy of abductive reasoning. Erkenntnis 37(1):1–26

Kaygusuz K (2009) The role of hydropower for sustainable energy development. Energy Sour Part B 4(4):365–376

Kornfeld IE (2011) Adiós to paradise: the Yacyretá Dam and the destruction of environmental and human rights. Florida A M Univ Law Rev 7(2):181–228

Kortenkamp KV, Moore CF (2001) Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. J Environ Psychol 21(3):261–272

Larkin B (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annu Rev Anthropol 42:327–343

Latini JR, Pedlowski MA (2016) Examinando as contradições em torno das Pequenas Centrais Hidrelétricas como fontes sustentáveis de energia no Brasil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 37:73–90

Laurie N, Baillie Smith M (2018) Unsettling geographies of volunteering and development. Trans Inst Br Geogr 43(1):95–109

Le Heron R, Baker R, McEwen L (2006) Co-learning: re-linking research and teaching in geography. J Geogr High Educ 30(1):77–87

Leenaars AA (2006) Suicide among indigenous peoples: introduction and call to action. Arch Suicide Res 10(2):103–115

Li Z, He D, Feng Y (2011) Regional hydropolitics of the transboundary impacts of the Lancang cascade dams. Water Int 36(3):328–339

Lima MAL, Carvalho AR, Nunes MA, Angelini R, Doria CRC (2020) Declining fisheries and increasing prices: the economic cost of tropical rivers impoundment. Fish Res 221:105399

Louzada AF, Ravena N (2019) Dam safety and risk governance for hydroelectric power plants in the Amazon. J Risk Res 22(12):1571–1585

Magilligan FJ, Sneddon CS, Fox CA (2016) The era of big dam building: it ain’t over till it’s over. In: Ashcraft CM, Mayer T (eds) The politics of fresh water: access, conflict and identity. Routledge, London, pp 78–97

Mora S (2018) Resistencias sociales a la cooperación de China en infraestructura: las represas Kirchner-Cepernic en Argentina. Colomb Int 94:53–81

Nüsser M (2014) Technological hydroscapes in Asia: the large dams debate reconsidered. In: Nüsser M (ed) Large dams in Asia: contested environments between technological hydroscapes and social resistance. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–14

Orellana MA (2005) Indigenous peoples, energy and environmental justice: the Pangue/Ralco hydroelectric project in Chile’s Alto BíoBío. J Energy Nat Resour Law 23(4):511–528

Owusu K, Asiedu AB, Yankson PWK, Boafo YA (2019) Impacts of Ghana’s Bui dam hydroelectricity project on the livelihood of downstream non-resettled communities. Sustain Sci 14(2):487–499

Park S (2009) The World Bank, dams and the meaning of sustainable development in use. J Int Law Int Relat 5(1):93–122

Peritore NP, Galve Peritore AK (1990) Brazilian attitudes toward agrarian reform: a Q-methodology opinion study of a conflictual issue. J Dev Areas 24(3):377–406

Plummer Braeckman J, Disselhoff T, Kirchherr J (2020) Cost and schedule overruns in large hydropower dams: an assessment of projects completed since 2000. Int J Water Resour Dev 36(5):839–854

Pollock NJ, Naicker K, Loro A, Mulay S, Colman I (2018) Global incidence of suicide among indigenous peoples: a systematic review. BMC Med 16:145

Reid LA, McCormick A (2010) Knowledge transfer at the research–policy interface: the geography postgraduates’ experiences of collaborative studentships. J Geogr High Educ 34(4):529–539

Resende AF, Schöngart J, Streher AS, Ferreira-Ferreira J, Piedade MTF, Silva TSF (2019) Massive tree mortality from flood pulse disturbances in Amazonian floodplain forests: the collateral effects of hydropower production. Sci Total Environ 659:587–598

Romero Toledo H, Romero Aravena H, Toledo Olivares X (2009) Agua, poder y discursos en el conflicto socio-territorial por la construcción de represas hidroeléctricas en la Patagonia chilena. Anuario de Estudios Americanos 66(2):81–103

Roquetti DR, Moretto EM, Pulice SMP (2017) Dam-forced displacement and social-ecological resilience: the Barra Grande Hydropower Plant in Southern Brazil. Ambiente Soc 20(3):115–134

Sandbrook CG, Fisher JA, Vira B (2013) What do conservationists think about markets? Geoforum 50:232–240

Schulz C, Adams WM (2019) Debating dams: the World Commission on Dams 20 years on. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 6(5):e1396

Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J, Glenk K (2018) Value landscapes and their impact on public water policy preferences. Glob Environ Change 53:209–224

Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J, Glenk K (2019) Understanding public views on a dam construction boom: the role of values. Water Resour Manag 33(14):4687–4700

Scudder T (2005) The future of large dams: dealing with social, environmental, institutional, and political costs. Earthscan, London

Scudder T (2017) The good megadam: does it exist, all things considered? In: Flyvbjerg B (ed) The Oxford handbook of megaproject management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 428–450

Siciliano G, Urban F (2017) Equity-based natural resource allocation for infrastructure development: evidence from large hydropower dams in Africa and Asia. Ecol Econ 134:130–139

Silva E (2016) Patagonia, without Dams! Lessons of a David vs. Goliath campaign. Extr Ind Soc 3:947–957

Sneddon C, Fox C (2008) Struggles over dams as struggles for justice: the World Commission on Dams (WCD) and anti-dam campaigns in Thailand and Mozambique. Soc Nat Resour 21(7):625–640

Snow CP (1969) The two cultures and a second look: an expanded version of the two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Sousa S, Botelho A, Costa Pinto LM, Valente M (2019) How relevant are non-use values and perceptions in economic valuations? The case of hydropower plants. Energies 12(15):2986

Sovacool BK, Walter G (2019) Internationalizing the political economy of hydroelectricity: security, development and sustainability in hydropower states. Rev Int Political Econ 26(1):49–79

Spears E (2018) Scale and political ecology: a conceptual analysis of the Brazilian Samarco disaster. Environ Politics Soc 25:151–162

Varas P, Tironi M, Rudnick H, Rodríguez N (2013) Latin America goes electric: the growing social challenges of hydroelectric development. IEEE Power Energ Mag 11(3):66–75

Walters SD (2018) In defense of identity politics. Signs 43(2):473–488

WATERLAT-GOBACIT (2019) About us. Available at: www.waterlat.org (accessed November 2019)

Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. SAGE, London

World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. Earthscan, London, Sterling

Wilson Fernandes G, Goulart FF, Ranieri BD, Coelho MS, Dales K, Boesche N, Bustamante M, Carvalho FA, Carvalho DC, Dirzo R, Fernandes S, Galetti PM Jr, Garcia Millan VE, Mielke C, Ramirez JL, Neves A, Rogass C, Ribeiro SP, Scariot A, Soares-Filho B (2016) Deep into the mud: ecological and socio-economic impacts of the dam breach in Mariana, Brazil. Nat Conserv 14(2):35–45

Zabala A (2014) qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. R J 6(2):163–173

Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K (2015) A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat Sci 77(1):161–170

Zhouri A, Oliveira R (2007) Desenvolvimento, conflitos sociais e violência no Brasil rural: o caso das usinas hidrelétricas. Ambiente Soc 10(2):119–135

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Sustainability Science

Tập 16 Số 1

255-269

Thông tin tác giả