In Search of the Chemical Revolution: Interpretive Strategies in the History of Chemistry

W. R. Albury. The Logic of Condillac and the Structure of French Chemical and Biological Theory, 1781-1801. Ph.D. Thesis, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1972. L. Althusser. Reading Capital, transl. by B. Brewster. London: New Left Books, 1968. L. Althusser. For Marx, transl. by B. Brewster. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1970. L. Althusser. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, transl. by B. Brewster. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 1971. W. Anderson. Between the Library and the Laboratory: The Language of Chemistry in Eighteenth-Century France, 1760-1820.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984. B. Barnes. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974. B. Barnes. T.S. Kuhn and the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1982. B. Bensaude-Vincent. Hélène Metzger's La Chimie: A Popular Treatise. History of Science 25: 71–84, 1987. B. Bensaude-Vincent. The Balance: Between Chemistry and Politics. The Eigtheenth Century: Theory and I. Interpretation 33: 217–238, 1992. B. Bensaude-Vincent and I. Stengers.A History of Chemistry, transl by D. van Dam. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1996. M. Beretta. The Enlightenment of Matter: The Definition of Chemistry from Agricola to Lavoisier. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1993. D. Bloor. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1976. D. Bloor. Durkheim and Mauus Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13: 267–287, 1982. J.R.R. Christie. The Development of the Historiography of Science. In: R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, pp. 4–22. London: Rutledge, 1990. J.R. Christie and J.Y. Golinski. The Spreading of the Word: New Directions in the Historiography of Chemistry, 1600-1800. History of Science 20, 235–266, 1982. P. Cilliers. Complexity and Postmodernism. Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge, 1998. I.B. Cohen. Franklin and Newton: An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Science and Franklin's Work as an Example Thereof. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1956. I.B. Cohen. The Many Faces of the History of Science: A Font of Examples for Philosophers, a Scientific Type of History, an Archaeology of Discovery, a Branch of Sociology, a Variant of Intellectual or Social History - or What?. In: C.F. Dessell (Ed.), The Future of History. Essays in the Vanderbilt Centennial Symposium, pp. 3–42. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1977. R.G. Collingwood. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939. E.W. Constant II. Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology. In: R. Laudan (Ed.), The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant?, pp. 27–43. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984. M. Crosland, Lavoisier's Theory of Acidity. Isis 64: 306–325, 1973. P. Dews. Althusser, Structuralism, and the French Epistemological Tradition. In: G. Eliot (Ed.), Althusser: A Critical Reader, pp. 104–141. London: Blackwell, 1994. A. Donovan. Lavoisier and the Origins of Modern Chemistry. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. A Reinterpretation. Osiris, 2nd series, volume 4, pp. 214–231. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988. A. Donovan. Lavoisier as Chemist and Experimental Physicist: A Reply to Perrin. Isis 81: 270–272, 1990. M. Fichman. French Stahlism and Chemical Studies of Air, 1750-1770.Ambix 18: 94–123, 1971. D. Forbes. Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Miller. Cambridge Journal 7: 643–670, 1954. M. Foucault. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, transl by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1972. T. Frangsmyr. Science or History: George Sarton and the Positivist Tradition in the History of Science. Lychnos 74: 104–144, 1973. J.V. Golinski. Science in the Enlightenment. History of Science 24: 411–424, 1986. J.V. Golinski. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. M. Gordy. Reading Althusser: Time and the Social Whole. History and Theory 22: 1–21, 1983. J.B. Gough. The Origins of Lavoisier's Theory of the Gaseous State. In: H. Woolf (Ed.), The Analytic Spirit. Essays on the History of Science in Honor of Henry Guerlac, pp. 15–39. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981. J.B. Gough. Lavoisier and the Fulfillment of the Stahlian Revolution. In: A Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 15–33. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1888. H. Guerlac. Lavoisier - the Crucial Year: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961. H. Guerlac. Some Historical Assumptions of the History of Science. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 797–812. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963a. H. Guerlac. Discussion. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 875–876. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963b. J. Habermas. Knowledge and Human Interest, transl. by J.J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1968. A.R. Hall. Merton Revisited: Or Science and Society in the Seventeenth Century. History of Science 2: 1–16, 1963. G. Hartfoort. The Missing Synthesis in the Historiography of Science. History of Science 24: 207–216, 1997. P.M. Heimann and J.E. McGuire. Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3: 233–306, 1970. F.L. Holmes. Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life. An Explanation of Scientific Creativity. Madison,WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985. F.L. Holmes. Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise. Office for History of Science and Technology, Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1989. D. Knight. Ideas in Chemistry. A History of the Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992. A. Koyré. Commentary. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 797–812. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963. A. Koyré. Metaphysics and Measurement. Essays in Scientific Revolution. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1968. H. Kragh. An Introduction to the Historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. T.S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1970. I. Lakatos. History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction. In: C. Howson (Ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905, pp. 7–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. B. Latour. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987. B. Latour and S. Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage Publications, 1979. L. Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1977. H. LeGrand. Lavisier's Oxygen Theory of Acidity. Annals of Science 24: 1–18, 1972. J.G. McEvoy. The Enlightenment and the Chemical Revolution. In: R.S. Woolhouse (Ed.), Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Essays in Honor of Gerd Buchdahl, pp. 307–325. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988a. J.G. McEvoy. Continuity and Discontinuity in The Chemical Revolution. In: A Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 195–213. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988b. J.G. McEvoy. The Chemical Revolution in Context. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 198–216, 1992. J.G. McEvoy. Priestley Responds to Lavoisier's Nomenclature: Language, Liberty, and Chemistry in the English Enlightenment. In: B. Bensaude-Vincent and F. Abbri (Eds.), Lavoisier in European Context. Negotiating a New Language for Chemistry, pp. 123–142. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1995. J.G. McEvoy. Positivism, Whiggism, and the Chemical Revolution: A Study in the Historiography of Chemistry. History of Science 35: 1–33, 1997. E. McMullin. The Rational and the Social in the History of Science. In: J.R. Brown (Ed.), Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, pp. 127–163. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984. E. Melhado. On the Historiography of Science: A Reply to Perrin. Isis 81: 273–276, 1990. R.J. Morris. Lavoisier and the Caloric Theory. British Journal of the History of Science 6: 1–38, 1972. G. Motzkin. The Catholic Response to Secularization and the Rise of the History of Science as a Discipline. Science in Context 3: 203–222, 1989. A. Musgrave. Why Did Oxygen Supplant Phlogiston? Research Programmes in the Chemical Revolution. In: Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905, pp. 181–209. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1976. C.E. Perrin. Research Traditions, Lavoisier, and the Chemical Revolution. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. A Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 53–81. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988. C.E. Perrin. Chemistry as a Peer of Physics: A Response to Donovan and Melhado on Lavoisier. Isis 81: 259–270, 1990. R. Porter. Preface. In: R. Porter and M. Teich (Eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context, pp. v–xii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. K.R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd ed., revised. London: Hutchinson, 1968. K.R. Popper. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. I. Prigogine and I. Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto: Bantam Books, 1984. L. Roberts. A Word and the World: The Significance of Naming the Calorimeter. Isis 82: 199–222, 1997a. L. Roberts. Setting the Table: The Disciplinary Development of Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as Read through the Changing Structure of its Tables. In: P. Dear (Ed.), The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument, pp. 99–132. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991b. R. Sargent. The Diffident Naturalist. Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995. S. Schaffer. Natural Philosophy. In: G.S. Rousseau and R. Porter (Eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, pp. 55–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. S. Schaffer. Making Certain. Social Studies of Science 14: 137–152, 1984. S. Schaffer. Measuring Virtue: Eudiometry, Enlightenment, and Pneumatic Medicine. In: A. Cunningham and R. French (Eds.), The Medical Enlightenment, pp. 218–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. R.E. Schofield. Joseph Priestley: Natural Philosopher. Ambix 14: 1–15, 1967. S. Shapin. Social Uses of Science. In: G.S. Rousseau and R. Porter (Eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, pp. 93–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. S. Shapin. History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions. History of Science 20: 157–211, 1982. S. Shapin. Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology. Social Studies of Science 14: 481–520, 1984. S. Shapin. Following Scientists Around: Essay Review of Bruno Latour, 'science in Action'. Social Studies of Science 19: 533–550, 1988. S. Shapin. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996. S. Shapin and S. Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985. R. Siegfried. The Chemical Revolution in the History of Chemistry. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 34–50. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988. R. Siegfried and B.J.T. Dobbs. Composition, a Neglected Aspect of the Chemical Revolution. Annals of Science 24: 273–293, 1968. J. Simon. The Chemical Revolution and Pharmacy. Ambix 44: 1–13, 1998. M. Teich. Afterword. In: R. Porter and M. Teich (Eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context, pp. 215–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. A. Thackray.Atoms and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter Theory and the Development of Chemistry. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1970. A. Thackray. Science: Has Its Present Past a Future?. In: R.H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, pp. 112–133. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach, 1989. S.E. Toulmin. Crucial Experiments: Priestley and Lavoisier. Journal of the History of Ideas 18: 205–222, 1957. S.T. Toulmin. Human Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972. F. Verbruggen. How to Explain Priestley's Defense of Phlogiston. Janus 54: 47–69, 1972. R.S. Westman and D.C. Lindberg. Introduction. In: R.S. Westman and D.C. Lindley (Eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, pp. xvii–xxvii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.