In Praise of Vagueness: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Archaeological Methodology
Tóm tắt
This article stipulates that vagueness is a socially important yet academically largely overlooked aspect of human interaction with the world. Vagueness and vague experiences can structure material categorisations of the world; it can contribute to the shaping of social relations and nurture the appreciation of difficult experiences. However, the recent archaeological (re)turn to science as the main provider of knowledge of the past renders vagueness futile as an empirical occurrence through its exorcism of elusiveness and ambiguity in the notorious pursuit of absolute, exact and quantifiable facts. This article challenges the pursuit and use of exact data in archaeological science and the consequential implications of the omission of vague occurrences, discussing the problem that ambiguous and absent evidence become neglected in subsequent conclusion. Second, it is demonstrated that vagueness and ambiguity can be integral to certain social and material phenomena. Third, the article examines recent archaeological analyses of burial practices in South Scandinavian passage graves from the Middle Neolithic in order to discuss the pursuit of certitude in archaeological observations and interpretations. Finally, it is argued that the idealisation of certitude in archaeological analysis needs to be complemented by an interpretative framework making it possible to recognise vagueness as a social phenomenon.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahlström, T. (2001). Det döda kollektivet. Bioantropologisk analys av skelettmaterialet från Rössbergagånggriften. In P. Persson & K.-G. Sjögren (Eds.), Falbygdens gånggrifter. Undersökningar 1985–1998 (pp. 301–362). Göteborgs: Göteborgs Universitet.
Ahlström, T. (2003). Grave or ossuary? Osteological finds from a recently excavated passage tomb in Falbygden, Sweden. In G. Burenhult, & S. Westergaard (Eds.), Stones and Bones: Formal disposal of the dead in Atlantic Europe during the Mesolithic-Neolithic interface 6000–3000 BC. Archaeological Conference in Honour of the Late Professor Michael J. O’Kelly. Proceedings of the Stones and Bones Conference in Sligo, Ireland, May 1–5, 2002 (pp. 253–269, Vol. 1201). Oxford: Archaeopress.
Ahlström, T. (2009). Underjordiska dödsriken: Humanosteologiska studier av neolitiska kollektivgravar. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Andersen, N. H. (1997). The sarup enclosures: The funnel beaker culture of the sarup site including two causewayed camps compared to the contemporary settlements in the area and other European enclosures, Sarup. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society.
Andersen, N. H. (2000). Kult og ritualer i den ældre bondestenalder. Kuml, 2000, 13–48.
Andersen, N. H. (2004). Sarup: causewayed enclosures placed in a Neolithic ritual landscape on Funen, Denmark. Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science, 14, 11–17.
Andersen, N. H. (2009). Sarupområdet på Sydvestfyn i slutningen af 4. årtusinde f. Kr. In A. Schülke (Ed.), Plads og rum i tragtbægerkulturen. Bidrag fra Arbejdsmødet på Nationalmuseet, 22. september 2005 (pp. 25–44). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
Andersen, N. H. (2010). Causewayed enclosures and megalithic monuments as media for shaping Neolithic identities. http://www.jungsteinsite.de/.
Bennett, B. (2001). What is a forest? On the vagueness of certain geographic concepts. Topoi, 20(2), 189–201.
Bille, M., Bjerregaard, P., & Sørensen, T. F. (2015). Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 31–38.
Blikstad-Balas, M. (2013). Vague concepts in the educational sciences: implications for researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 528–539.
Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36, 113–126.
Böhme, G. (1995). Atmosphäre: Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Böhme, G. (1998). Anmutungen: Über das Atmosphärische. Ostfildern Von Stuttgart: Edition Tertium.
Böhme, G. (2006). Architektur und atmosphäre. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Boivin, N. (2009). Grasping the elusive and unknowable: material culture in ritual practice. Material Religion, 5(3), 266–287.
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Brück, J. (2006). Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in middle and late bronze age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), 297–315.
Brück, J. (2014). Cremation, gender and concepts of the self in the British bronze age. In I. Kuijt, C. Quinn, & G. Cooney (Eds.), Transformation by fire: The archaeology of cremation in cultural context (pp. 119–139). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Buchli, V. (2000). An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg.
Copeland, B. J. (1995). On vague objects, fuzzy logic and fractal boundaries. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1), 83–96.
Croucher, K. (2010). Bodies in pieces in the Neolithic Near East. In K. C. Rebay, M. L. S. Sørensen, & J. Hughes (Eds.), Body parts and wholes: Changing relations and meanings (pp. 6–19). Oxford: Oxbow.
De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
Dehn, T., & Hansen, S. I. (2002). Megalithic architecture in scandinavia. In R. Joussaume, L. Laporte, & C. Scarre (Eds.), Origine et développement du mégalithisme de L’ouest de L’Europe. Actes du colloque international, 26–30 Octobre 2002, Bougon, France (pp. 39–61). Bougon: Musée des Tumulus de Bougon (Deus-Sèvres).
Dehn, T., & Hansen, S. I. (2007). Examples of megalithic technology and architecture in Denmark. In J. H. F. Bloemers (Ed.), Tussen D26 en P14: Jan Albert Bakker 65 jaar (pp. 17–32). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Archeologische Centrum.
Dehn, T., Hansen, S. I., & Westphal, J. (2004). Jættestuen Birkehøj. Restaurering af en 5.000 år gammel storstensgrav. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, 2004, 153–174.
Deleuze, G. (2002). The actual and the virtual. In G. Deleuze, & C. Parnet (Eds.), Dialogues II (pp. 148–159). London: Continuum. First published 1977.
Edgington, D. (1995). On Conditionals. Mind, 104(414), 235–329.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics: The growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engelke, M. (2007). Clarity and Charisma: on the uses of ambiguity in ritual life. In M. Engelke & M. Tomlinson (Eds.), The limits of meaning: Case studies in the anthropology of christianity (pp. 63–83). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Eriksen, P., & Andersen, N. H. (2014). Stendysser. Arkitektur og funktion. Højbjerg: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab.
Evans, G. (1978). Can there be vague objects? Analysis, 38, 208.
Fahlander, F. (2012). Articulating stone. The material practice of petroglyphing. In I.-M. Back Danielsson, F. Fahlander, & Y. Sjöstrand (Eds.), Encountering imagery: Materialities, perceptions, relations (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Fowler, C. (2005). Identity politics: Personhood, kinship, gender and power in neolithic and early bronze age Britain. In E. C. Casella & C. Fowler (Eds.), The archaeology of plural and changing identities: Beyond identification (pp. 109–134). New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
Fowler, C. (2008). Fractal bodies in the past and present. In D. Borić & J. Robb (Eds.), Past bodies: Body-centered research in archaeology (pp. 47–57). Oxford: Oxbow.
Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R., & Toms, J. (1991). Preface. In P. Garwood, D. Jennings, R. Skeates, & J. Toms (Eds.), Sacred and profane: Proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion (pp. v-x). Oxford: Oxford University Committee.
Gero, J. M. (2007). Honoring ambiguity/problematizing certitude. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 311–327.
Goetz, R., & Graupner, S. (Eds.). (2007). Atmosphäre(n): Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff. München: Kopäd.
Goetz, R., & Graupner, S. (Eds.). (2012). Atmosphäre(n) II: Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff. München: Kopäd.
Graff, D. (2000). Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 28(1), 45–81.
Hájek, P. (2009). On vagueness, truth values and fuzzy logics. Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, 91(3), 367–382.
Hawkes, C. (1954). Archeological theory and method: some suggestions from the old world. American Anthropologist, 56(2), 155–168.
Hawley, K. (2001). How things persist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heibach, C. (Ed.). (2012). Atmosphären: Dimensionen eines diffusen Phänomens. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Hodder, I. (1992). Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Holten, L. (2000). Death, danger, destruction and unintended megaliths: an essay on human classification and its material and social consequences in the neolithic of South Scandinavia. In A. Ritchie (Ed.), Neolithic orkney in its european context (pp. 287–297). Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Hyde, D. (2011). The sorites paradox. In G. Ronzitti (Ed.), Vagueness: A guide (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ingarden, R. (1973). The literary work of art: an investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic, and theory of literature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. First published 1931.
Inwagen, P. V. (1988). How to reason about vague objects. Philosophical Topics, 16(1), 255–284.
Inwagen, P. V. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Iser, W. (1972). The reading process: a phenomenological approach. New Literary History, III(2), 279–301.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Kaul, F. (1992). Ritualer med menneskeknogler i yngre stenalder. Kuml, 1991(92), 7–53.
Kristiansen, K. (2015). Towards a new paradigm? The third science revolution and its possible consequences in archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22, 11–34.
Larsson, Å. M. (2003). Secondary burial practices in the middle neolithic: causes and consequences. Current Swedish Archaeology, 11, 153–170.
Larsson, Å. M. (2009a). Breaking and making bodies and pots: material and ritual practices in Sweden in the third millennium BC. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Larsson, Å. M. (2009b). Organized chaos. Defleshing, cremation and dispersal of the dead in pitted ware culture. In I.-M. Back Danielsson, I. Gustin, A. Larsson, N. Myrberg, & S. Thedéen (Eds.), Döda personers sällskap: Gravmaterialens identiteter och kulturella uttryck (pp. 109–130). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, D. (1993). Many, but almost one. In K. Campbell, J. Bacon, & L. Reinhardt (Eds.), Ontology, causality, and mind: Essays on the philosophy of D.M. armstrong (pp. 23–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lidén, K., & Eriksson, G. (2013). Archaeology vs. Archaeological science: do we have a case? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, 11–20.
Ling, J., Hjärthner-Holdar, E., Grandin, L., Billström, K., & Persson, P.-O. (2012). Moving metals or indigenous mining? Provenancing scandinavian bronze age artefacts by lead isotopes and trace elements. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 291–304.
Ling, J., Stos-Gale, Z., Grandin, L., Billström, K., Hjärthner-Holdar, E., & Persson, P.-O. (2014). Moving metals II: provenancing scandinavian bronze age artefacts by lead isotope and elemental analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41(1), 106–132.
Madsen, T. (2009). Aalstrup - en boplads og systemgravsanlæg ved Horsens Fjord. In A. Schülke (Ed.), Plads og rum i tragtbægerkulturen. Bidrag fra Arbejdsmødet på Nationalmuseet, 22. september 2005 (pp. 105–138). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
Massumi, B. (1987). Realer than the real: the simulacrum according to deleuze and guattari. Copyright, 1, 90–97.
Merricks, T. (2001). Varieties of vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXIII(1), 145–157.
Midgley, M. S. (1992). TRB culture. The first farmers of the north european plain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Miller, V. (2006). The unmappable: vagueness and spatial experience. Space and Culture, 9(4), 453–467.
Morreau, M. (2002). What vague objects are like. The Journal of Philosophy, XCIX(7), 333.
Nordman, C. A. (1917). Studier över gånggriftkulturen i Danmark. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1917, 269–332.
Perl, J. M., Davis, N. Z., & Allen, B. (2011). Fuzzy studies: a symposium on the consequence of blur. Part 1. Common Knowledge, 17(3), 441–449.
Persson, P., & Sjögren, K.-G. (Eds.). (2001). Falbygdens gånggrifter. Undersökninger 1985–1998. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.
Prescott, C. (2013). Archaeology vs. science: or taking knowledge-based communication seriously? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, 39–44.
Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: the making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rauh, A. (2012). Die besondere atmosphäre: Ästhetische feldforschungen. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Renfrew, C. (1985). The archaeology of cult: the sanctuary at Phylakopi. London: Thames & Hudson.
Rosenberg, G. (1929). Nye jættestuefund. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1929, 189–262.
Rosenberg, G. (1933). To Jættestuer. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, 1933, 5–14.
Schuldt, E. (1972). Die mecklenburgischen Megalithgräber. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Architektur und Funktion. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1982). Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of neolithic mortuary practices. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology (pp. 129–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sjögren, K.-G. (2010a). Anonymous ancestors? The tilley/shanks hypothesis revisited. In D. Calado, M. Baldia, & M. Boulanger (Eds.), Monumental questions: Prehistoric megaliths, mounds, and enclosures (pp. 111–118). Oxford: Archaeopress.
Sjögren, K.-G. (2010b). Megaliths, landscapes and identities: The case of Falbygden, Sweden. http://www.jungsteinsite.de/.
Sjögren, K.-G. (2015). Mortuary practices, bodies and persons in Northern Europe. In C. Fowler, J. Harding, & D. Hofmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of neolithic Europe (pp. 1005–1022). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sjögren, K.-G., Price, T. D., & Ahlström, T. (2009). Megaliths and mobility in south-western Sweden. Investigating relationships between a local society and its neighbours using strontium isotopes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28(1), 85–101.
Skaarup, J. (1985). Yngre stenalder på øerne syd for Fyn. Rudkøbing: Langelands Museum.
Skoglund, P., Malmström, H., Raghavan, M., Storå, J., Hall, P., Willerslev, E., et al. (2012). Origins and genetic legacy of neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe. Science, 336(6080), 466–469.
Sørensen, T. F. (2009). The presence of the dead: cemeteries, cremation and the staging of non-place. Journal of Social Archaeology, 9(1), 110–135.
Sørensen, T. F. (2010). A saturated void: anticipating and preparing presence in contemporary Danish cemetery culture. In M. Bille, F. Hastrup, & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), An anthropology of absence: Materializations of transcendence and loss (pp. 115–130). New York: Springer.
Sørensen, T. F. (2011). Sweet dreams: biographical blanks and the commemoration of children. Mortality, 16(2), 161–175.
Sørensen, T. F. (2012). Delusion and disclosure: human disposal and the aesthetics of vagueness. In M. L. S. Sørensen & K. Rebay-Salisbury (Eds.), Embodied knowledge: Historical perspectives on technology and belief (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Sørensen, T. F. (2014). Re/turn: cremation, movement and re-collection in the early bronze age of Denmark. In I. Kuijt, C. Quinn, & G. Cooney (Eds.), Transformation by fire: The archaeology of cremation in cultural context (pp. 168–188). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Sørensen, T. F. (2015). More than a feeling: Towards an archaeology of atmosphere. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 64–73.
Stanzel, F. K. (2004). The "Complementary story": outline of a reader-oriented theory of the novel. Style, 38(2), 203–220.
Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.
Straus, L. G. (2004). Comment to Peter Rowley-Conwy. Current Anthropology, 45(Supplement), S104–S105.
Strömberg, M. (1968). Der Dolmen Trollasten, in St. Köpinge, Schonen (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia, Series in 8°, Vol. 7). Lund: CWK Gleerups Förlag.
Tilley, C. (1991a). Constructing a ritual landscape. In K. Jennbert, L. Larsson, R. Petre, & B. Wyszomirska-Werbart (Eds.), Regions and reflections (in honour of Marta Strömberg) (pp. 67–79). Lund: Almquist & Wiksell International.
Tilley, C. (1991b). Material culture and text: The art of ambiguity. London: Routledge.
Tilley, C. (1996). An ethnography of the neolithic: early prehistoric societies in Southern Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tye, M. (1994). Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 8: Logic and language (pp. 189–206). Northridge: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
Tye, M. (1995). Vagueness: welcome to the quicksand. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1), 1–22.
Tye, M. (2000). Vagueness and reality. Philosophical Topics, 28(1), 195–209.
Unger, P. K. (1979). There are no ordinary things. Synthese, 41(2), 411–467.
Unger, P. K. (1980). The problem of the many. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5, 411–467.
van Deemter, K. (2010). Not exactly: in praise of vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Varzi, A. C. (2001). Vagueness in geography. Philosophy and Geography, 4(1), 49–65.
Willerslev, R. (2011). Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(3), 504–526.
Witmore, C. L. (2015). Archaeology and the second empiricism. In C. Hillerdal & J. Siapkas (Eds.), Debating archaeological empiricism: The ambiguity of material evidence (pp. 37–67). London: Routledge.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.