Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fretheim A, Schünemann H, Oxman AD: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group Processes. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006
Schünemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating Values and Consumer Involvement. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006
Regulations for Expert Advisory Panels and Committees. Resolution WHA 35 10. 1982, WHO
2003, Guidelines for WHO guidelines. Geneva, Global Programme onEvidence for Health Policy, WHO;
Moynihan R, Oxman AD, Lavis J, Paulsen E: A review of organizations that support the use of research evidence in developing guidelines, technology assessments, and health policy, for the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research. 2006, Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
Fretheim A, Williams JW, Oxman AD, Herrin J: The relation between methods and recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. J Fam Pract. 2002, 51: 963-968.
Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Makela M, Zaat J: Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003, 15: 31-45. 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.31.
SIGN Guideline Development Handbook. 2004, Edinburgh, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.
Handbook for the Preparation of Explicit Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2001, Wellington, New Zealand Guidelines Group.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: The guidelines manual. 2006, London, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
National Health and Medical Research Council: A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. 1998, Canberra, National Health and Medical Research Council
Schünemann: H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for Guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006
Hill S, Garattini S, van Loenhout J, O'Brien BJ, de Joncheere K: Technology Appraisal Programme of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. 2003, Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe
Kelsom M: The NICE Patient Involvement Unit. Evidence-Based Healthcare & Public Health. 2005, 9: 304-307. 10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.05.013.
Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Schünemann H: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006
Cochrane Methodology Register. [ http://www.cochrane.org/access_data/cmr/accessDB_cmr.asp ]
National Guideline Clearinghouse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2006, [ http://www.guidelines.gov ]
Guidelines International Network (GIN). Guidelines International Network. 2006, [ http://www.g-i-n.net ]
Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, Marteau T: Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998, 2: i-88.
Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J: Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999, 318: 593-596.
Clinical Practice Guidelines. Directions for a New Program. Edited by: Field MJ and Lohr KN. 1990, Washington DC, National Academy Press
Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC: A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992, 268: 240-248. 10.1001/jama.268.2.240.
Raine R, Sanderson C, Hutchings A, Carter S, Larkin K, Black N: An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet. 2004, 364: 429-437. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16766-4.
Herrin J, Etchason JA, Kahan JP, Brook RH, Ballard DJ: Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendations. Health Policy. 1997, 42: 67-81. 10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00055-9.
Vader JP, Porchet F, Larequi-Lauber T, Dubois RW, Burnand B: Appropriateness of surgery for sciatica: reliability of guidelines from expert panels. Spine. 2000, 25: 1831-1836. 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00015.
Bernstein SJ, Lazaro P, Fitch K, Aguilar MD, Kahan JP: Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study. Med Care. 2001, 39: 513-520. 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00011.
Fitch K, Lazaro P, Aguilar MD, Martin Y, Bernstein SJ: Physician recommendations for coronary revascularization. Variations by clinical speciality. Eur J Public Health. 1999, 9: 181-187. 10.1093/eurpub/9.3.181.
Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, Guadagnoli E, McNeil BJ: Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography--do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other?. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338: 1896-1904. 10.1056/NEJM199806253382608.
Chalmers I: Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2003, 589: 22-40. 10.1177/0002716203254762.
Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD: Interventions for promoting consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. 2006
Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Gabbay J, Gyte G, Oakley A, Stein K: Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004, 8: 1-IV.
Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C: Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002, 61: 213-236. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00214-7.
Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P: Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002, 325: 1263-10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263.
Coney S: Effective Consumer Voice and Participation for New Zealand. 2004, New Zealand Guidelines Group