Improving program targeting to combat early-life mortality by identifying high-risk births: an application to India

Population Health Metrics - Tập 16 - Trang 1-7 - 2018
Antonio P. Ramos1, Robert E. Weiss1, Jody S. Heymann2
1Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
2WORLD Policy Analysis Center, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA

Tóm tắt

It is widely recognized that there are multiple risk factors for early-life mortality. In practice most interventions to curb early-life mortality target births based on a single risk factor, such as poverty. However, most premature deaths are not from the targeted group. Thus interventions target many births that are at not at high risk and miss many births at high risk. Using data from the second wave of Demographic and Health Surveys from India and a hierarchical Bayesian model, we estimate infant mortality risk for 73.320 infants in India as a function of 4 risk factors. We show how this information can be used to improve program targeting. We compare our novel approach against common programs that target groups based on a single risk factor. A conventional approach that targets mothers in the lowest quintile of income correctly identifies only 30% of infant deaths. By contrast, using four risk factors simultaneously we identify a group of births of the same size that includes 57% of all deaths. Using the 2012 census to translate these percentages into numbers, there were 25.642.200 births in 2012 and 4.4% died before the age of one. Our approach correctly identifies 643.106 of 1.128.257 infant deaths while poverty only identifies 338.477 infant deaths. Our approach considerably improves program targeting by identifying more infant deaths than the usual approach that targets births based on a single risk factor. This leads to more efficient program targeting. This is particularly useful in developing countries, where resources are lacking and needs are high.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Moser A, Leon D, Gwatkin D. How does progress towards the child mortality millennium development goal affect inequalities between the poorest and least poor? Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data. BMJ: Br Med J. 2005;331:1180–3. Stuckler D, Basu S, Mckee M. Drivers of inequality in Millennium Development Goal progress: a statistical analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7(3):e1000241. Molyneux M, Molyneux E. Reaching Millennium Development Goal 4. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;4:146–7. Victora C, Requejo JH, Barros AJ, Berman P, Bhutta Z, Boema T, et al. Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival. The Lancet. 2016;387(10032):2049–59. NIMS, ICMR and UNICEF. Infant and Child Mortality in India: Levels, Trends and Determinants. New Delhi: National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and UNICEF India Country Office; 2012. Houweling TA, Kunst AE. Socio-economic inequalities in childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the international evidence. Br Med Bull. 2010;93:7–26. Gwatkin D. How much would the poor gain from faster progress towards the Millennium Development Goals for health? The Lancet. 2005;365:813–7. Victora C, Wagstaff A, Schellenberg J, Gwatkin D, Claeson M, Habicht J. Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough. The Lancet. 2003;362(9379):233–41. Sastry N. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in developing countries: the case of child survival in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Demography. 2004;41(3):443–64. Wagstaff A. Socioeconomic inequalities in child mortality: comparisons across nine developing countries. Bulletin of The World Health Organization. 2000;78(1):19–29. Brockerhoff M, Hewett P. Inequality of child mortality among ethnic groups in sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of The World Health Organization. 2000;78(1):30–41. Antai D. Regional inequalities in under-5 mortality in Nigeria: a population-based analysis of individual- and community-level determinants. Population Health Metrics. 2011;9(1):1–10. Jankowska MM, Benza M, Weeks JR. Estimating spatial inequalities of urban child mortality. Demographic Research. 2013;28(2):33–62. Gwatkin D, Bhuiya A, Victora C. Making Health Systems more equitable. The Lancet. 2004 October;364:1273–80. Black R, Morris S, Bryce J, Venis S. Where and why are 10 mil- lion children dying every year? Commentary. The Lancet. 2003;361:2226–34. Braveman P, Starfield B, Geiger J. World Health Report 2000: how it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy. Br Med J. 2001;323:678–81. Bryce J, el Arifeen S, Pariyo G, Lanata C, Gwatkin D, Habicht J. Reducing child mortality: can public health deliver? The Lancet. 2003;362(9378):159–64. Jones G, Steketee R, Black R, Bhutta Z, Morris S. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? The Lancet. 2003;362:65–71. Glassman A, Duran D, Fleisher L, Singer D, Sturke R, Angeles G, Charles J, et al. Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health. J Health, Popul Nutr. 2013;31.4(Suppl 2):S48–66. Basset L. Can Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Play a Greater Role in Reducing Child Undernutrition? World Bank; 2008. Akresh R, de Walque D, Kazianga H. Alternative Cash Transfer Delivery Mechanism: Impacts on Routine Preventive Health Clinic Visits in Burkina Faso. Natl Bur Econ Res. 2015;17785 Banerjee A, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kothari D. Improving immunization coverage in rural India: clustered randomized controlled evaluation of immunization campaigns with and without incentives. Br Med J. 2010;340:c2220. Huicho L, Segura ER, Huayanay-Espinoza CA, Guzman JN, Restrepo-Mendez MC, Tam Y, et al. Child health and nutrition in Peru within an antipoverty political agenda: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(6):e414–26. Gakidou E, Oza S, Fuertes CV, Li AY, Lee DK, Sousa A, et al. Improving Child Survival Through Environmental and Nutritional Interventions The Importance of Targeting Interventions Toward the Poor. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(16):1876–87. Gakidou E, King G. Measuring total health inequality: adding individual variation to group-level differences. Int J Equity in Health. 2002;1(1):3–3. Gakidou E, King G. Determinants of inequality of child survival: results from 39 countries. In: Murray CJL, editor. Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods and Empiricism. World Health Organiza- tion; 2003. p. 194–216. World Health Organization. Health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization; 2000. Pandey A, Choe MK, Luther NY, Chand J. National Family Health Survey Subject Report No 11. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India East-West Center Program on Population, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; 1998. Pandey A, Bhattacharya BN, Sahu D, Sultana R. Are too early, too quickly and too many births the high risk births: An analysis of infant mortality in India using National Family Health Survey. Demography India. 2004;33(2):127–56. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria Hadfield JD. MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(2):1–22. Marmot M. Health in an unequal world. The Lancet. 2006;368:2081–94. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. 2nd ed. Springer; 2009. Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern HS, Dubson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin D. Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2013. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA ,The World Bank, and United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality 1990-2013. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Bustreo F, Say L, Koblinsky M, Pullum T, Temmerman M. Ending preventable maternal deaths: the time is now. The Lancet Global Health. 2013;1:176–7. Murray C. Commentary: comprehensive approaches are needed for full understanding. Br Med J. 2001;323(7314):680–1. Black R, Cousens S, Johnson H, Lawn J, Rudan I, Bassani D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2010;375:1969–87.