Improving outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies using artificial intelligence for sperm selection

Fertility and Sterility - Tập 120 - Trang 729-734 - 2023
Nicole Lustgarten Guahmich1, Elena Borini1, Nikica Zaninovic1
1Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdullah, 2023, Automation in ART: paving the way for the future of infertility treatment, Reprod Sci, 30, 1006, 10.1007/s43032-022-00941-y Riegler, 2021, Artificial intelligence in the fertility clinic: status, pitfalls and possibilities, Hum Reprod, 36, 2429, 10.1093/humrep/deab168 Zaninovic, 2020, Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology, Fertil Steril, 114, 914, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.157 Dimitriadis, 2022, Artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a review, Reprod Biomed Online, 44, 435, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.003 Palermo, 1992, Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte, Lancet, 340, 17, 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F Jain, 2007, Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States, N Engl J Med, 357, 251, 10.1056/NEJMsa070707 Dyer, 2016, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010, Hum Reprod, 31, 1588, 10.1093/humrep/dew082 Palermo, 1995, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility, Fertil Steril, 63, 1231, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57603-1 Barroso, 1999, Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation, staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysis, Hum Reprod, 14, 2036, 10.1093/humrep/14.8.2036 Eustache, 2003, Inter-individual variability in the morphological assessment of human sperm: effect of the level of experience and the use of standard methods, Hum Reprod, 18, 1018, 10.1093/humrep/deg197 Gatimel, 2017, Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017, Andrology, 5, 845, 10.1111/andr.12389 Hajirasouliha, 2020, Precision medicine and artificial intelligence: overview and relevance to reproductive medicine, Fertil Steril, 114, 908, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.156 Rosenblatt, 1958, The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychol Rev, 65, 386, 10.1037/h0042519 Schmidhuber, 2015, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview, Neural Netw, 61, 85, 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 He, 2019, The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine, Nat Med, 25, 30, 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 Chu, 2019, Artificial intelligence in reproductive urology, Curr Urol Rep, 20, 52, 10.1007/s11934-019-0914-4 Kanakasabapathy, 2017, An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis, Sci Transl Med, 9, eaai7863, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7863 Parrella, 2022, P-110 A novel artificial intelligence microscopy: Mojo AISA, the new way to perform semen analysis, Hum Reprod, 37 Mittal, 2017, Pd68-01 pilot study results using fluorescence activated cell sorting of spermatozoa from testis tissue: a novel method for sperm isolation after TESE, J Urol, 197, e1339, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3129 Medina-Rodríguez, 2015, Sperm cells segmentation in micrographic images through Lambertian reflectance model, 664 Hidayatullah P, Zuhdi M. Automatic sperms counting using adaptive local threshold and ellipse detection. In: 2014 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI); 2014 November 24–27; Bandung, Indonesia, 2014:56–61. Lee, 2022, Automated rare sperm identification from low-magnification microscopy images of dissociated microsurgical testicular sperm extraction samples using deep learning, Fertil Steril, 118, 90, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.011 Majzoub, 2021, Predictive model to estimate the chances of successful sperm retrieval by testicular sperm aspiration in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia, Fertil Steril, 115, 373, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1397 Zeadna, 2020, Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective, Hum Reprod, 35, 1505, 10.1093/humrep/deaa109 Ory, 2022, Artificial intelligence based machine learning models predict sperm parameter upgrading after varicocele repair: a multi-institutional analysis, World J Mens Health, 40, 618, 10.5534/wjmh.210159 Ottl, 2022, motilitAI: a machine learning framework for automatic prediction of human sperm motility, iScience, 25, 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104644 Javadi, 2019, A novel deep learning method for automatic assessment of human sperm images, Comput Biol Med, 109, 182, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.030 Yüzkat, 2021, Multi-model CNN fusion for sperm morphology analysis, Comput Biol Med, 137, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104790 You, 2021, Machine learning for sperm selection, Nat Rev Urol, 18, 387, 10.1038/s41585-021-00465-1 Sato, 2022, A new deep-learning model using YOLOv3 to support sperm selection during intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure, Reprod Med Biol, 21, 10.1002/rmb2.12454 Mostajer Kheirkhah, 2018, Modified histogram-based segmentation and adaptive distance tracking of sperm cells image sequences, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 154, 173, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.11.005 Somasundaram, 2021, Faster region convolutional neural network and semen tracking algorithm for sperm analysis, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 200, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105918 Mendizabal-Ruiz, 2022, Computer software (SiD) assisted real-time single sperm selection associated with fertilization and blastocyst formation, Reprod Biomed Online, 45, 703, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.036 Evenson, 1980, Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility, Science, 210, 1131, 10.1126/science.7444440 Cissen, 2016, Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, PLOS ONE, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0165125 Palermo, 2014, Perspectives on the assessment of human sperm chromatin integrity, Fertil Steril, 102, 1508, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.008 McCallum, 2019, Deep learning-based selection of human sperm with high DNA integrity, Commun Biol, 2, 250, 10.1038/s42003-019-0491-6 Hughes, 1996, A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay, Mol Hum Reprod, 2, 613, 10.1093/molehr/2.8.613 Twigg, 1998, Analysis of the impact of intracellular reactive oxygen species generation on the structural and functional integrity of human spermatozoa: lipid peroxidation, DNA fragmentation and effectiveness of antioxidants, Hum Reprod, 13, 1429, 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1429 Dubey, 2019, Partially spatially coherent digital holographic microscopy and machine learning for quantitative analysis of human spermatozoa under oxidative stress condition, Sci Rep, 9, 3564, 10.1038/s41598-019-39523-5 Martini, 2004, Effects of alcohol and cigarette consumption on human seminal quality, Fertil Steril, 82, 374, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.022 Butola, 2020, High spatially sensitive quantitative phase imaging assisted with deep neural network for classification of human spermatozoa under stressed condition, Sci Rep, 10, 10.1038/s41598-020-69857-4 Balki, 2019, Sample-size determination methodologies for machine learning in medical imaging research: a systematic review, Can Assoc Radiol J, 70, 344, 10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.002 Char, 2018, implementing machine learning in health care - addressing ethical challenges, N Engl J Med, 378, 981, 10.1056/NEJMp1714229 Chang, 2017, Gold-standard for computer-assisted morphological sperm analysis, Comput Biol Med, 83, 143, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.004 Shaker, 2017, A dictionary learning approach for human sperm heads classification, Comput Biol Med, 91, 181, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.009 Ilhan, 2020, A fully automated hybrid human sperm detection and classification system based on mobile-net and the performance comparison with conventional methods, Med Biol Eng Comput, 58, 1047, 10.1007/s11517-019-02101-y Baldini, 2021, Sperm selection for ICSI: do we have a winner?, Cells, 10, 3566, 10.3390/cells10123566 You, 2019, Live sperm trap microarray for high throughput imaging and analysis, Lab Chip, 19, 815, 10.1039/C8LC01204K Costa-Borges, 2021, O-122 ICSI in a box: development of a successful automated sperm injection robot with external supervision and minimal manual intervention, Hum Reprod, 36 Costa-Borges, 2023, First babies conceived with automated intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Reprod Biomed Online, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.009