Improving conservation practice with principles and tools from systems thinking and evaluation
Tóm tắt
Achieving nature conservation goals require grappling with ‘wicked’ problems. These intractable problems arise from the complexity and dynamism of the social–ecological systems in which they are embedded. To enhance their ability to address these problems, conservation professionals are increasingly looking to the transdisciplines of systems thinking and evaluation, which provide philosophies, theories, methods, tools and approaches that show promise for addressing intractable problems in a variety of other sectors. These transdisciplines come together especially around praxis, i.e., the process by which a theory or idea is enacted, embodied or realized. We present a review and synthesis of the learnings about praxis that have emerged from The Silwood Group, a consortium of conservation professionals, professional evaluators, and complexity and systems thinkers. The Silwood Group believes that for conservation activities to achieve ambitious goals, we should benefit nature without compromising the well-being of people, and that framing a praxis for conservation in the context of social–ecological systems will provide the greatest potential for positive impact. The learnings are presented as four key principles of a ‘praxis for effective conservation’. The four principles are: (1) attend to the whole with humility; (2) engage constructively with the values, cultures, politics, and histories of stakeholders; (3) learn through evaluative, systemic enquiry, and (4) exercise wisdom in judgement and action. We also provide descriptions and references for tools and methods to support such praxis and discuss how the thinking and approaches used by conservation professionals can be transformed to achieve greater effectiveness.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16:3–9
Adams WM, Mulligan M (2003) Decolonizing nature: strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era. Earthscan, London, United Kingdom
Alcoff LM (2006) Visible identities: race, gender and the self. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
Allen W, Ogilvie S, Blackie H, Smith D, Sam S, Doherty J, McKenzie D, Ataria J, Shapiro L, MacKay J, Murphy E (2014) Bridging disciplines, knowledge systems and cultures in pest management. Env Manag 53:429–440
Arter JA, McTighe J (2001) Scoring rubrics in the classroom: using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California
Awad EM, Ghaziri HM (2004) Knowledge management. Pearson Education International, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Barry D, Oelschlaeger M (1996) A science for survival: values and conservation biology. Conserv Biol 10:905–911
Baylis K, Honey-Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Ferraro PJ, Lapeyre R, Persson UM, Pfaff A, Wunder S (2016) Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conserv Letts 9:58–64
Bell S, Morse S (2013) Rich pictures: a means to explore the ‘sustainable mind’? Sust Develop 21:30–47
Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC, Chan KMA, Clark DA, Cullman G, Epstein G, Nelson MP, Stedman R, Teel TL, Thomas REW, Wyborn C, Curran D, Greenberg A, Sandlos J, Veríssimo D (2017) Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv Biol 31:56–66
Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Biggs D, Abel N, Knight AT, Leitch A, Langston A, Ban NC (2011) The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help? Conserv Lett 4:169–183
Bottrill MC, Joseph LN, Carwardine J, Bode M, Cook CN, Game ET, Grantham H, Kark S, Linke S, McDonald-Madden E, Pressey RL, Walker S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evol 23:649–654
Bottrill MC, Walsh JC, Watson JEM, Joseph LN, Ortega-Argueta A, Possingham HP (2011) Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species? Biol Conserv 144:1595–1601
Burford G, Kissmann S, Rosado-May FJ, Alvarado Dzul SH, Harder MK (2012) Indigenous participation in intercultural education: learning from Mexico and Tanzania. Ecol Soc 17(4):33
Butchart SHM, Clarke M, Smith RJ, Sykes RE, Scharlemann JPW, Harfoot M, Buchanan GM, Angulo A, Balmford A, Bertzky B, Brooks TM, Carpenter KE, Comeros-Raynal MT, Cornell J, Ficetola GF, Fishpool LDC, Fuller RA, Geldmann J, Harwell H, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoffmann M, Joolia A, Joppa L, Kingston N, May I, Milam A, Polidoro B, Ralph G, Richman N, Rondinini C, Segan DB, Skolnik B, Spalding MD, Stuart SN, Symes A, Taylor J, Visconti P, Watson JEM, Wood L, Burgess ND (2015) Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conserv Lett 8:329–337
Checkland PB (1989) Soft systems methodology. Hum Sys Manag 8:273–289
Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Rev Behav Sci 17:11–58
Christie CA, Alkin MC (2012) An evaluation theory tree. In: Alkin MC (ed) Evaluation roots: a wider perspective of theorists’ views and influences, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
Cilliers P (2005) Knowing complex systems. In: Richardson KA (ed) Managing organizational complexity: philosophy, theory, and application. Information Age Publications, Greenwich, pp 7–19
CMP (2013) The open standards for the practice of conservation. Conservation measures partnership. Washington, DC
Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (1973) Multiple criteria decision-making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina
Cook SN, Wagenaar H (2012) Navigating the eternally unfolding present toward an epistemology of practice. Am Rev Public Adm 42:3–38
Cook CN, Mascia MB, Schwartz MW, Possingham HP, Fuller RA (2013) Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conserv Biol 27:669–678
Cook CN, de Bie K, Keith DA, Addison PFE (2016) Decision triggers are a critical part of evidence-based conservation. Biol Conserv 195:46–51
Cousins BJ (2003) Utilization effects of participatory evaluation. In: Kellaghan T, Stufflebeam DL (eds) International handbook of educational evaluation, vol 9. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, Springer, Dordrecht
Cowling RM, Knight AT, Privett SDJ, Sharma GP (2010) Invest in opportunity, not inventory in hotspots. Conserv Biol 24:633–635
Davidson EJ (2005) Marketing evaluation as a profession and a discipline. J MultiDisciplinary Eval 2:3–10
Dewey J (1933) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath and Company, Chicago
Dicks LV, Walsh JC, Sutherland WJ (2014) Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a ‘4S’ hierarchy. Trends Ecol Evol 29:607–613
Dowie M (2011) Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Soft Technol 50(9–10):833–859
Easterly W (2013) The tyranny of experts: economists, dictators, and the forgotten rights of the poor. Basic Books, New York City
Eoyang GH (2004) Conditions for self-organizing in human systems. Futurics 28:10–59
Eoyang GH (2007) Human systems dynamics: complexity-based approach for complex evaluation. In: Williams B, Imam I (eds) Systems concepts in evaluation. Edge Press of Inverness. Point Reyes, California
Eoyang G, Holladay R (2013) Adaptive action: leveraging uncertainty in your organization. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Change 16:253–267
Foote JL, Gregor JE, Hepil MC, Baker VE, Houston DJ, Midgley G (2007) Systemic problem structuring applied to community involvement in water conservation. J Op Res Soc 58:645–654
Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New York
Game ET, Meijaard E, Sheil D, McDonald-Madden E (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world: challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7:271–277
Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol Conserv 161:230–238
Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CMJ (2011) Impact evaluation in practice. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Gill DA, Mascia MB, Ahmadia GN, Glew L, Lester SE, Barnes M, Craigie I, Darling ES, Free CM, Geldmann J, Holst S, Jensen OP, White AT, Basurto X, Coad L, Gates RD, Guannel G, Mumby PJ, Thomas H, Whitmee S, Woodley S, Fox HE (2017) Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543:665–669
Grantham H, Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Pressey RL, Rebelo AG, Possingham HP (2008) Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning. Conserv Lett 1:190–198
Gregory R, Long G (2009) Using structured decision-making to help implement a precautionary approach to endangered species management. Risk Anal 29:518–532
Gregory N, Gregory R (2010) A values-based framework for community food choices. Env Val 19:99–119
Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Harms R (2015) Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: learning in a lean startup environment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 100:21–28
Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2000) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing the management of protected areas. World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Guidelines. IUCN, Switzerland
Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edn. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom
Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405
Hood S, Hopson R, Frierson H (2015) Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, North Carolina
Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Tot Env 409:3578–3594
Ison R, Schlindwein SL (2015) Navigating through an ecological desert and a sociological hell: a cyber-systemic governance approach for the Anthropocene. Kybernetes 44:891–902
Jachowski DS, Kesler DC (2009) Allowing extinction: should we let species go? Trends Ecol Evol 24(4):180
Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Kapos V et al (2008) Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conserv Lett 1:155–164
Keene M, Pullin AS (2011) Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management. J Environ Manage 92:2130–2135
Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617
Knowlton L, Phillips C (2013) The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results. Sage, Los Angeles
Le Gales C, Moatti JP (1990) Searching for consensus through multi-criteria decision analysis. Int J Tech Assess in Health Care 6:430–449
Legg CJ, Nagy L (2006) Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. J Environ Manage 78:194–199
Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516
Mace GM (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345:1558–1560
Malinga R, Gordon LJ, Lindborg R, Jewitt G (2013) Using participatory scenario planning to identify ecosystem services in changing landscapes. Ecol Soc 18:10
Margoluis R, Stem C, Salafsky N, Brown M (2009) Design alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation projects. New Dir Eval 122:85–96
Martin J, Runge MC, Nichols JD, Lubow BC, Kendall WL (2009) Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. Ecol Appl 19:1079–1090
Mascia MB, Pailler S, Thieme ML, Rowe A, Bottrill MC, Danielsen F, Geldmann J, Naidoo R, Pullin AS, Burgess ND (2014) Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biol Conserv 169:258–267
Max-Neef MA (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Econ 53:5–16
McKeon RP (1974) Introduction to Aristotle: revised and enlarged. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB (1999) Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story. Eval Program Plann 22:65–72
McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Van Thang H, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, Welch-Devineh M, Brosius JP, Coppolillo P, O’Connor S (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144:966–972
Meadows DH (2008) Thinking in systems. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, Vermont
Mezirow J (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Moore M, Maland Cady J (2015) Developmental evaluation in the McKnight Foundation’s Collaborative Crop Research Program: a journey of discovery. In: Patton MQ, McKegg K, Wehipeihana N (eds) Developmental evaluation exemplars: principles in practice. Guilford Press, New York, pp 143–162
Naidoo R, Weaver LC, Diggle RW, Matongo G, Stuart-Hill G, Thouless C (2016) Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conserv Biol 30:628–638
Nicolescu B (2002) Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. SUNY Press, New York
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom
Nyaupane GP, Poudel S (2011) Linkages among biodiversity, livelihood, and tourism. Ann Tour Res 38:1344–1366
Ortega-Argueta A, González-Zamora A, Contreras-Hernándezc A (2016) A framework and indicators for evaluating policies for conservation and development: the case of wildlife management units in Mexico. Environ Sci Policy 63:91–100
Parsons B (2009) Evaluative inquiry for complex times. OD Practitioner 41:44–49
Parsons B (2012) Using complexity science concepts when designing system interventions and evaluations. InSites, Fort Collins, Colorado. http://www.insites.org/resource/using-complexity-science-concepts-when-designing-system-interventions-and-evaluations
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
Patton MQ (2008) Utilization-focused evaluation, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
Patton MQ (2010) Developmental evaluation applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press, New York
Patton MQ (2011) Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press, New York
Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (1999) Knowing “what” to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. Calif Manage Rev 42:83–107
Pielke R (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Preskill H, Catsambas T (2006) Reframing evaluation through appreciative inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
Preskill H, Gopal S (2014) Evaluating complexity: propositions for improving practice. FSG, Seattle, Washington
Pullin AS, Knight TM (2001) Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv Biol 15:50–54
Redford KH, Taber S (2000) Writing the wrongs: developing a safe-fail culture in conservation. Conserv Biol 14:1567–1568
Redford KH, Hulvey KB, Williamson MA, Schwartz MW (2018) Assessment of the conservation measures partnership’s effort to improve conservation outcomes through adaptive management. Conserv Biol 32:926–937
Reynolds M (2011) Critical thinking and systems thinking: towards a critical literacy for systems thinking in practice. In: Horvath CP, Forte JM (eds) Critical thinking. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 37–68
Reynolds M, Holwell S (2010) Introducing systems approaches. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, London, pp 1–23
Ries E (2011) The lean startup. Crown Publishing, New York
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Pol Sci 4:155–169
Romero C, Sills EO, Guariguata MR, Cerutti PO, Lescuyer G, Putz FE (2017) Evaluation of the impacts of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of natural forest management in the tropics: rigorous approach to assessment of a complex conservation intervention. Int For Rev 19:1–14
Salafsky N, Margolius R, Redford KH, Robinson JG (2002) Improving the practice of conservation: a conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conserv Biol 16:1469–1479
Samuels M, Ryan K (2011) Grounding evaluations in culture. Am J Eval 32:183–198
Sayer J, Campbell B, Petheram L, Aldrich M, Perez MR, Endamana D, Burgess N (2007) Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 16:2677–2694
Schoemaker PJH (1995) Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Manag Rev 36:25–40
Schwaber K, Beedle M (2001) Agile software development with scrum. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Schwartz B, Sharpe K (2006) Practical wisdom: Aristotle meets positive psychology. J Happiness Stud 7:377–395
Schwartz MW, Cook CN, Pressey RL, Pullin AS, Runge MC, Sutherland WJ, Williamson MA (2017) Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation. Conserv Lett 11(2):1–12
Scriven M (1991) Evaluation thesaurus. Edge Press of Inverness, Point Reyes, California
Scriven M (2007) The logic of evaluation. In: Hansen HV (ed) Dissensus and the search for common ground. University of Windsor, Ontario, pp 1–17
Stewart MA (2016) Nurturing caring relationships through five simple rules. Engl J 105(3):22–28
Stuart SN, Wilson EO, McNeely JA, Mittermeier RA, Rodríguez JP (2010) The barometer of life. Science 328:177
Thomas V, Parsons B (2017) Culturally responsive evaluation meets systems-oriented evaluation. Am J Eval 38:7–28
Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural Theory. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado
Toomey AH, Knight AT, Barlow J (2017) Navigating the space between research and implementation in conservation. Conserv Lett 10:619–625
Tuhiwai Smith L (2018) Indigenous insight on valuing complexity, sustaining relationships, being accountable. In: Hopson R, Cram F (eds) Tackling wicked problems in complex ecologies: the role of evaluation. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp 45–66
Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Refl Pract 1:247–268
Ulrich W (2003) Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. J Oper Res Soc 54:325–342
Ulrich W, Reynolds M (2010) Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change. Springer, London, pp 243–292
Valters C (2015) Theories of change: time for a radical approach to learning in development. The Asia Foundation, Overseas Development Institute, London
Vo AT, Archibald T (2018) New directions for evaluative thinking. In: Vo AT, Archibald T (eds) New directions for evaluation. 158, pp 139-147
Wack P (1985) Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harv Bus Rev 63:72–89
Watkins J, Cooperrider D (2000) Appreciative inquiry: a transformative paradigm. OD Pract 32:6–12
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38:1046–1059
Wildlife Conservation Society, Bio-Era (2007) Futures of the Wild. A Project of the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Futures Group, Wildlife Conservation Society and Bio-Era, New York
Williams B, Hummelbrunner R (2010) Systems concepts in action: a practitioner’s toolkit. Stanford University Press, California
WK Kellogg Foundation (2017) The step-by-step guide of evaluation: how to become savvy evaluation consumers. Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
Zimmerman B, Lindberg C, Plsek PE (2008) Edge Ware: lessons from complexity science for health care leaders. VHA, Irving, Texas
Zylstra MJ, Knight AT, Esler KJ, Le Grange LL (2014) Connectedness as a core conservation concern: an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Sci Rev 2:119–143