Improving conservation practice with principles and tools from systems thinking and evaluation

Sustainability Science - Tập 14 - Trang 1531-1548 - 2019
Andrew T. Knight1,2,3, Carly N. Cook4, Kent H. Redford5,6, Duan Biggs2,7,8, Claudia Romero9, Alejandro Ortega-Argueta10, Cameron D. Norman11,12, Beverly Parsons13, Martin Reynolds14, Glenda Eoyang15, Matt Keene16
1Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, United Kingdom
2ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
3Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
4School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
5Archipelago Consulting, Portland, USA
6Department of Environmental Studies, University of New England, Biddeford, USA
7Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
8Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
9Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
10Departamento de Conservación de la Biodiversidad, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Unidad San Cristóbal Carret, Chiapas, Mexico
11Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
12Cense Ltd., Toronto, Canada
13InSites, Fort Collins, USA
14School of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
15Human Systems Dynamics Institute, Circle Pines, USA
16The Silwood Group LLC, Arlington, USA

Tóm tắt

Achieving nature conservation goals require grappling with ‘wicked’ problems. These intractable problems arise from the complexity and dynamism of the social–ecological systems in which they are embedded. To enhance their ability to address these problems, conservation professionals are increasingly looking to the transdisciplines of systems thinking and evaluation, which provide philosophies, theories, methods, tools and approaches that show promise for addressing intractable problems in a variety of other sectors. These transdisciplines come together especially around praxis, i.e., the process by which a theory or idea is enacted, embodied or realized. We present a review and synthesis of the learnings about praxis that have emerged from The Silwood Group, a consortium of conservation professionals, professional evaluators, and complexity and systems thinkers. The Silwood Group believes that for conservation activities to achieve ambitious goals, we should benefit nature without compromising the well-being of people, and that framing a praxis for conservation in the context of social–ecological systems will provide the greatest potential for positive impact. The learnings are presented as four key principles of a ‘praxis for effective conservation’. The four principles are: (1) attend to the whole with humility; (2) engage constructively with the values, cultures, politics, and histories of stakeholders; (3) learn through evaluative, systemic enquiry, and (4) exercise wisdom in judgement and action. We also provide descriptions and references for tools and methods to support such praxis and discuss how the thinking and approaches used by conservation professionals can be transformed to achieve greater effectiveness.

Tài liệu tham khảo