Improving conservation policy with genomics: a guide to integrating adaptive potential into U.S. Endangered Species Act decisions for conservation practitioners and geneticists

W. Chris Funk1, Brenna R. Forester2, Sarah J. Converse3, Catherine R. Darst4, Steve Morey5
1Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
3U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences (SEFS) & School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (SAFS), University of Washington, Seattle, USA
4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura, USA
5U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agashe D, Falk JJ, Bolnick DI (2011) Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution 65:2481–2491

Aitken SN, Whitlock MC (2013) Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:367–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747

Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11:697–709

Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Wiley, Oxford

Alvarez M, Schrey AW, Richards CL (2015) Ten years of transcriptomics in wild populations: what have we learned about their ecology and evolution? Mol Ecol 24:710–725

Andrews KR, Good JM, Miller MR et al (2016) Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet 17:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2015.28

Bataille A, Cashins SD, Grogan L, Skerratt LF, Hunter D, McFadden M, Scheele B, Brannelly LA, Macris A, Harlow PS, Bell S, Berger L, Waldman B (2015) Susceptibility of amphibians to chytridiomycosis is associated with MHC class II conformation. Proc R Soc B 282:20143127

Beaumont MA, Balding DJ (2004) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol 13:969–980

Bell G, Collins S (2008) Adaptation, extinction and global change. Evol Appl 1:3–16

Bell G, Gonzalez A (2009) Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol Lett 12:942–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01350.x

Bell G, Gonzalez A (2011) Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science 332:1327–1330. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203105

Berg JJ, Coop G (2014) A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation. PLOS Genet 10:e1004412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412

Bernatchez L (2016) On the maintenance of genetic variation and adaptation to environmental change: considerations from population genomics in fishes. J Fish Biol 89:2519–2556

Berven KA (1982) The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica. I. An experimental analysis of life history traits. Evolution 36:962–983

Bierne N, Roze D, Welch JJ (2013) Pervasive selection or is it… why are FST outliers sometimes so frequent? Mol Ecol 22:2061–2064. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12241

Black WCIV, Baer CF, Antolin MF, DuTeau NM (2001) Population genomics: genome-wide sampling of insect populations. Annu Rev Entomol 46:441–469

Blows MW, Hoffmann AA (2005) A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1209

Bonin A, Nicole F, Pompanon F et al (2007) Population adaptive index: a new method to help measure intraspecific genetic diversity and prioritize populations for conservation. Conserv Biol 21:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00685.x

Boyd C, DeMaster DP, Waples RS, Ward EJ, Taylor BL (2017) Consistent extinction risk assessment under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv Lett 10:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12269

Brosi BJ, Biber EG (2009) Statistical inference, Type II error, and decision making under the US Endangered Species Act. Front Ecol Environ 7:487–494

Burger R, Lynch M (1995) Evolution and extinction in a changing environment—a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49:151–163

Canessa S, Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Southwell DM, Armstrong DP, Chadès I, Lacy RC, Converse SJ (2015) When do we need more data? A primer on calculating the value of information for applied ecologists. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1219–1228

Carroll R, Augspurger C, Dobson A, Franklin J, Orians G, Reid W, Tracy R, Wilcove D, Wilson J (1996) Strengthening the use of science in achieving the goals of the endangered species act: an assessment by the Ecological Society of America. Ecol Appl 6:1–11

Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:3124–3140

Catchen JM, Hohenlohe PA, Bernatchez L et al (2017) Unbroken: RADseq remains a powerful tool for understanding the genetics of adaptation in natural populations. Mol Ecol Resour 17:362–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12669

Cattau CE, Fletcher RJ Jr, Kimball RT, Miller CW, Kitchens WM (2017) Rapid morphological change of a top predator with the invasion of a novel prey. Nature Ecol Evol 2(1):108

Claussen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1948) Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington

Converse SJ, Moore CT, Armstrong DP (2013) Demographics of reintroduced populations: estimation, modeling, and decision analysis. J Wildl Manag 77:1081–1093

Converse SJ, Bailey LL, Mosher BA, Funk WC, Gerber BD, Muths E (2017) A model to inform management actions as a response to chytridiomycosis-associated decline. Ecohealth 14:S144–S155

Coop G, Witonsky D, Di Rienzo A, Pritchard JK (2010) Using environmental correlations to identify loci underlying local adaptation. Genetics 185:1411–1423

Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290–295

Creech TG, Epps CW, Landguth EL et al (2017) Simulating the spread of selection-driven genotypes using landscape resistance models for desert bighorn sheep. PLoS ONE 12:e0176960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176960

Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML (2011) Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 12:499–510

Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI et al (2011) Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303

de Villemereuil P, Frichot É, Bazin É et al (2014) Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them? Mol Ecol 23:2006–2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12705

Doak DF, Himes Boor GK, Bakker VJ, Morris WF, Louthan A, Morrison SA, Stanley S, Crowder LB (2015) Recommendations for improving recovery criteria under the US Endangered Species Act. Bioscience 65:189–199

Dobzhansky T, Wright S (1941) Genetics of natural populations. V. Relations between mutation rate and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 26:23–51

Doremus H (1997) Listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act: why better science isn’t always better policy. Wash Univ Law Q 75:1029–1153

[ESA] US Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, Pub. L. No. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884 (28 Dec 1973). http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/ESAall.pdf

Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow

Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2005) Supplementation or in situ conservation? Evidence of local adaptation in the Italian agile frog Rana latastei and consequences for the management of populations. Anim Conserv 8:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004001805

Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Forester BR, Lasky JR, Wagner HH, Urban DL (2018) Comparing methods for detecting multilocus adaptation with multivariate genotype-environment associations. Mol Ecol 27:2215–2233

François O, Martins H, Caye K, Schoville SD (2016) Controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection. Mol Ecol 25:454–469

Frankham R, Lees K, Montgomery ME, England PR, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA (1999) Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? Anim Conserv 2:255–260

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe AD (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Frankham R, Brook BW, Bradshaw CJA, Traill LW, Spielman D (2013) 50/500 rule and minimum viable populations: response to Jamieson and Allendorf. Trends Ecol Evol 28:187–188

Franklin IR (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

Franks SJ, Kane NC, O’Hara NB, Tittes S, Rest JS (2016) Rapid genome-wide evolution in Brassica rapa populations following drought revealed by sequencing of ancestral and descendant gene pools. Mol Ecol 25:3622–3631

Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol 10:2741–2752

Frichot E, Schoville SD, Bouchard G, Francois O (2013) Testing for associations between loci and environmental gradients using latent factor mixed models. Mol Biol Evol 30:1687–1699

Fritts TH (1984) Evolutionary divergence of giant tortoises in Galapagos. Biol J Linn Soc 21:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb02059.x

Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol Evol 27:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.012

Garant D, Forde SE, Hendry AP (2007) The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct Ecol 21:434–443

Garner BA, Hand BK, Amish SJ, Bernatchez L, Foster JT, Miller KM, Morin PA, Narum SR, O’Brien SJ, Roffler G, Templin WD, Sunnucks P, Strait J, Warheit KI, Seamons TR, Wenburg J, Olsen J, Luikart G (2016) Genomics in conservation: case studies and bridging the gap between data and application. Trends Ecol Evol 31:81–83

Garrard GE, Rumpff L, Runge MC, Converse SJ (2017) Rapid prototyping for decision structuring: an efficient approach to conservation decision analysis. In: Bunnefeld N, Nicholson E, Milner-Gulland E (eds) Decision-making in conservation and natural resource management: models for interdisciplinary approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Gienapp P, Fior S, Guillaume F, Lasky JR, Sork VL, Csillery K (2017) Genomic quantitative genetics to study evolution in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 32:897–908

Glenn TC (2011) Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol Ecol Resour 11:759–769

Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Wiley, Oxford

Haig SM, D’Elia J (2010) Avian subspecies and the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Ornithol Monogr 67:24–34

Haldane JBS (1930) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection (VI Isolation). Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 26:220–230

Hansen MM, Olivieri I, Waller DM, Nielsen EE, Grp GW (2012) Monitoring adaptive genetic responses to environmental change. Mol Ecol 21:1311–1329

Hanson JO, Rhodes JR, Riginos C, Fuller RA (2017) Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning. PNAS 114:12755–12760

Harrisson KA, Pavlova A, Telonis-Scott M, Sunnucks P (2014) Using genomics to characterize evolutionary potential for conservation of wild populations. Evol Appl 7:1008–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12149

Hendry AP, Kinnison MT, Heino M et al (2011) Evolutionary principles and their practical application. Evol Appl 4:159–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00165.x

Hess JE, Zendt JS, Matala AR, Narum SR (2016) Genetic basis of adult migration timing in anadromous steelhead discovered through multivariate association testing. Proc R Soc B 283. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.3064

Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–485

Hoffmann AA, Hallas RJ, Dean JA, Schiffer M (2003) Low potential for climatic stress adaptation in a rainforest Drosophila species. Science 301:100–102. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084296

Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM, Kristensen TN (2017) Revisting adaptive potential, population size, and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 32:506–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.012

Hohenlohe PA, Day MD, Amish SJ, Miller MR, Kamps-Hughes N, Boyer MC, Muhlfeld CC, Allendorf FW, Johnson EA, Luikart G (2013) Genomic patterns of introgression in rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout illuminated by overlapping paired-end RAD sequencing. Mol Ecol 22:3002–3013

Hong EP, Park JW (2012) Sample size and statistical power calculation in genetic association studies. Genomics Inform 10:117–122. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2012.10.2.117

Jamieson IG, Allendorf FW (2012) How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs? Trends Ecol Evol 27:578–584

Jamieson IG, Allendorf FW (2013) A school of red herring: reply to Frankham et al. Trends Ecol Evol 28:188–189

Johnson FA, Hagan G, Palmer WE, Kemmerer M (2014) Uncertainty, robustness, and the value of information in managing a population of northern bobwhites. J Wildl Manag 78:531–539

Joost S, Bonin A, Bruford MW, Despres L, Conord C, Erhardt G, Taberlet P (2007) A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection: towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Mol Ecol 16:3955–3969

Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Keith D, Akçakaya HR, Butchart SHM, Collen B, Dulvy NK, Homes EE, Hutchings JA, Keinath D, Schwartz MK, Shelton AO, Wapes RS (2015) Temporal correlations in population trends: conservation implications from time-series analysis of diverse animal taxa. Biol Conserv 192:247–257

Kellermann VM, Heerwaarden B van, Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM (2006) Very low additive genetic variance and evolutionary potential in multiple populations of two rainforest Drosophila species. Evolution 60:1104–1108. https://doi.org/10.2307/4095411

Kelly MW, Sanford E, Grosberg RK (2012) Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proc R Soc B 279:349–356

Kimura M, Crow JF (1963) The measurement of the effective population number. Evolution 17:279–288

Korte A, Farlow A (2013) The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9:29

Kovach RP, Gharrett AJ, Tallmon DA (2012) Genetic change for earlier migration timing in a pink salmon population. Proc R Soc B 279:3870–3878

Lasky JR, Upadhyaya HD, Ramu P et al (2015) Genome-environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits. Sci Adv 1:e1400218. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400218

Lemmon AR, Emme SA, Lemmon EM (2012) Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst Biol 61:727–744

Li S, Li B, Cheng C et al (2014) Genomic signatures of near-extinction and rebirth of the crested ibis and other endangered bird species. Genome Biol 15:557. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0557-1

Lowry DB, Hoban S, Kelley JL et al (2016) Breaking RAD: an evaluation of the utility of restriction site-associated DNA sequencing for genome scans of adaptation. Mol Ecol Resour 17:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12635

Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan S, Taberlet P (2003) The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat Rev Genet 4:981–994

Manel S, Perrier C, Pratlong M, Abi-Rached L, Paganini J, Pontarotti P, Aurelle D (2016) Genomic resources and their influence on the detection of the signal of positive selection in genome scans. Mol Ecol 25:170–184

McKay JK, Bishop JG, Lin JZ, Richards JH, Sala A, Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress. Proc R Soc B 268:1715–1721

McKinney GJ, Larson WA, Seeb LW, Seeb JE (2017) RADseq provides unprecedented insights into molecular ecology and evolutionary genetics: comment on Breaking RAD by Lowry et al. (2016). Mol Ecol Resour 17:356–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12649

Merilä J, Hendry AP (2014) Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol Appl 7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12137

Muñoz NJ, Farrell AP, Heath JW, Neff BD (2015) Adaptive potential of a Pacific salmon challenged by climate change. Nat Clim Change 5:163–166

Nagy ES, Rice KJ (1997) Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079–1089

[NMFS and USFWS] National Marine Fisheries Serivice and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2010) Interim endangered and threatened species recover planning guidance, version 1.3. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/

Neel MC, Leidner AK, Haines A, Goble DD, Scott JM (2012) By the numbers: how is recovery defined by the US Endangered. Species Act? BioScience 62:646–657

Nicotra AB, Beever EA, Robertson AL et al (2015) Assessing the components of adaptive capacity to improve conservation and management efforts under global change. Conserv Biol 29:1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12522

O’Connor MI, Selig ER, Pinsky ML, Altermatt F (2012) Toward a conceptual synthesis for climate change responses. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:693–703

Payseur BA, Rieseberg LH (2016) A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Mol Ecol 25:2337–2360

Penuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M, Barbeta A, Rivas-Ubach A, Llusia J, Garbulsky M, Filella I, Jump AS (2013) Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Chang Biol 19:2303–2338

Perrier C, Delahaie B, Charmantier A (2018) Heritability estimates from genomewide relatedness matrices in wild populations: application to a passerine, using a small sample size. Mol Ecol Resour (in press)

Prince DJ, O’Rourke SM, Thompson TQ, Ali OA, Lyman HS, Saglam IK, Hotaling TJ, Spidle AP, Miller MR (2017) The evolutionary basis of premature migration in Pacific salmon highlights the utility of genomics for informing conservation. Sci Adv 3:e1603198

Reed TE, Schindler DE, Hague MJ, Patterson DA, Meir E, Waples RS, Hinch SG (2011) Time to evolve? Potential evolutionary responses of Fraser River sockeye salmon to climate change and effects on persistence. PLoS ONE 6:e20380

Regan TJ, Taylor BL, Thompson GG, Cochrane JF, Ralls K, Runge MC, Merrick R (2013) Testing decision rules for categorizing species’ extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol 27:821–831

Rellstab C, Gugerli F, Eckert AJ et al (2015) A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol Ecol 24:4348–4370. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13322

Rohlf DJ (1991) Six biological reasons the Endangered Species Act doesn’t work—and what to do about it. Conserv Biol 5:273–282

Ruegg K, Bay RA, Anderson EC, Saracco JF, Harrigan RJ, Whitfield M, Paxton EH, Smith TB (2018) Ecological genomics predicts climate vulnerability in an endangered southwestern songbird. Ecol Lett (in press)

Ruhl JB (2004) The battle over the Endangered Species Act methodology. FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 99

Runge MC (2011) An introduction to adaptive management for threatened and endangered species. J Fish Wildl Manag 2:220–233

Runge MC, Converse SJ, Lyons JE (2011) Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program. Biol Conserv 144:1214–1223

Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol 1:9–10

Savage AE, Zamudio KR (2011) MHC genotypes associate with resistance to a frog-killing fungus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16705–16710

Scheffers BR, De Meester L, Bridge TCL, Hoffmann AA, Pandolfi JM, Corlett RT, Butchart SHM, Pearce-Kelly P, Kovacs KM, Dudgeon D, Pacifici M, Rondinini C, Foden WB, Martin TG, Mora C, Bickford D, Watson JEM (2016) The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354:aaf7671

Sgro C, Lowe A, Hoffmann A (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4:326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x

Shafer ABA, Wolf JBW, Alves PC, Bergstrom L, Bruford MW, Brannstrom I, Colling G, Dalen L, De Meester L, Ekblom R, Fawcett KD, Fior S, Hajibabaei M, Hill JA, Hoezel AR, Hoglund J, Jensen EL, Krause J, Kristensen TN, Krutzen M, McKay JK, Norman AJ, Ogden R, Ouml;sterling EM, Ouborg NJ, Piccolo J, Popovic D, Primmer CR, Reed FA, Roumet M, Salmona J, Schenekar T, Schwartz MK, Segelbacher G, Senn H, Thaulow J, Valtonen M, Veale A, Vergeer P, Vijay N, Vila C, Weissensteiner M, Wennerstrom L, Wheat CW, Zielinski P (2015) Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol Evol 30:78–87

Shaffer ML, Stein MA (2000) Safeguarding our precious heritage. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 301–321

Sillanpää MJ (2011) On statistical methods for estimating heritability in wild populations. Mol Ecol 20:1324–1332

Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792

Smith DR, Allan NL, McGowan CP, Szymanski JA, Oetker SR, Bell HM (2018) Development of a Species Status Assessment process for decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. J Fish Wildl Manag 9:302–320

Sork VL (2018) Genomic studies of local adaptation in natural plant populations. J Hered 109:3–15

Stanton-Geddes J, Yoder JB, Briskine R, Young ND, Tiffin P (2013) Estimating heritability using genomic data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1151–1158

Steane DA, Potts BM, McLean E et al (2014) Genome-wide scans detect adaptation to aridity in a widespread forest tree species. Mol Ecol 23:2500–2513. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12751

Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the Great Acceleration. Anthropocene Rev 2:81–98

Szymanski J, Smith T, Horton A, Parkin M, Ragan L, Masson G, Olson E, Gifford K, Hill L (2016a) Rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) species status assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Final Report, Version 1

Szymanski J, Pollack C, Ragan L, Redmer M, Clemency L, Voorhies K, JaKa J (2016b) Species status assessment for the eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, SSA Report Version 2

Taylor MFJ, Suckling KF, Rachlinski JJ (2005) The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: a quantitative analysis. Bioscience 55:360–367

Theimer TC, Smith AD, Mahoney SM, Ironside KE (2016) Available data support protection of the Southwestern willow flycatcher under the Endangered Species Act. Condor 118:289–299

Thomas L, Palumbi SR (2017) The genomics of recovery from coral bleaching. Proc R Soc B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1790

Thorpe RS, Reardon JT, Malhotra A (2005) Common garden and natural selection experiments support ecotypic differentiation in the Dominican anole (Anolis oculatus). Am Nat 165:495–504

Todd EV, Black MA, Gemmell NJ (2016) The power and promise of RNA-seq in ecology and evolution. Mol Ecol 25:1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13526

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1995) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule determining endangered status for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher. Fed Reg 60:10694–10715

[USFWS and NMFS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service (1996) Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. Fed Reg 61:4722–4725

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2016) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; threatened species status for rusty patched bumble bee. Fed Reg 82:3186–3208

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2017) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; endangered species status for the eastern massasauga rattlesnake. Fed Reg 81:667214–671936

Verhoeven KJF, Vonholdt BM, Sork VL (2016) Epigenetics in ecology and evolution: what we know and what we need to know. Mol Ecol 25:1631–1638

Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2015) A general unified framework to assess the sampling variance of heritability estimates using pedigree or marker-based relationships. Genetics 199:223–232

Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR (2008) Heritability in the genomics era—concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet 9:255–266

Vucetich JA, Nelson MP, Phillips MK (2006) The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol 20:1383–1390

Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan, New York

Waples RS (1991) Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of ‘species’ under the Endangered Species Act. Act Mar Fish Rev 53:11–22

Waples RS, Nammack M, Cochrane JF, Hutchings JA (2013) A tale of two acts: endangered species listing practices in Canada and the United States. Bioscience 63:723–734

Waples RK, Larson WA, Waples RS (2016) Estimating contemporary effective population size in non-model species using linkage disequilibrium across thousands of loci. Heredity 117:233–240

Weeks AR, Sgro CM, Young AG et al (2011) Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evol Appl 4:709–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x

White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study Suppl 46:120–138

Williams BK, Szaro RC, Shapiro CD (2007) Adaptive management: the U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC

Williams BK, Eaton MJ, Breininger DR (2011) Adaptive resource management and the value of information. Ecol Modell 222:3429–3436

Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

Wright S (1938) Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87:430–431

Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

Zink RM (2015) Genetics, morphology, and ecological niche modeling do not support the subspecies status of the endangered willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). Condor 117:78–86