Improving Long-term Monitoring of Contaminated Groundwater at Sites where Attenuation-based Remedies are Deployed
Tóm tắt
This study presents an effective approach to tackle the challenge of long-term monitoring of contaminated groundwater sites where remediation leaves residual contamination in the subsurface. Traditional long-term monitoring of contaminated groundwater sites focuses on measuring contaminant concentrations and is applicable to sites where contaminant mass is removed or degraded to a level below the regulatory standard. The traditional approach is less effective at sites where risk from metals or radionuclides continues to exist in the subsurface after remedial goals are achieved. We propose a long-term monitoring strategy for this type of waste site that focuses on measuring the hydrological and geochemical parameters that control attenuation or remobilization of contaminants while de-emphasizing contaminant-concentration measurements. We demonstrate how this approach would be more effective than traditional long-term monitoring, using a site in South Carolina, USA, where groundwater is contaminated by several radionuclides. A comprehensive enhanced attenuation remedy has been implemented at the site to minimize discharge of contamination to surface water. The immobilization of contaminants occurs in three locations by manipulation of hydrological and geochemical parameters, as well as by natural attenuation processes. Deployment of our proposed long-term monitoring strategy will combine subsurface and surface measurements using spectroscopic tools, geophysical tools, and sensors to monitor the parameters controlling contaminant attenuation. The advantage of this approach is that it will detect the potential for contaminant remobilization from engineered and natural attenuation zones, allowing potential adverse changes to be mitigated before contaminant attenuation is reversed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aasen H, Honkavaara E, Lucieer A, Zarco-Tejada PJ (2018) Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: a review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correction workflows. Remote Sens 10:1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091
Ajo-Franklin J, Dou S, Daley T, Freifeld B, Robertson M, Ulrich C, Wood T, Eckblaw I, Lindsey N, Martin E, Wagner A (2017) Time-lapse surface wave monitoring of permafrost thaw using distributed acoustic sensing and a permanent automated seismic source. SEG Tech Program Expanded Abstr 2017:5223–5227
Bao X, Chen L (2012) Recent progress in distributed fiber optic sensor. Sensor 12:8601–8639
Barnowski R, Haefner A, Mihailescu L, Vetter K (2015) Scene data fusion: real-time standoff volumetric gamma-ray imaging. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 800:65–69
Bea BA, Wainwright HM, Spycher N, Faybishenko B, Hubbard SS, Denham M (2013) Identifying key controls on acidic-U(VI) plume behavior at the Savannah River Site, using reactive transport modeling. J Contam Hydrol 151:34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.04.005
Bethke CM, Farrell B, Sharifi M (2020) The Geochemist’s Workbench®, release 14: GWB essentials. Aqueous Solutions, LLC, Champaign, IL
Binley A, Hubbard SS, Huisman JA, Revil A, Robinson DA, Singha K, Slater LD (2015) The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resour Res 51:3837–3866. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016
Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Benner SG, McRae CWT, Bennett TA, Puls RW (2000) Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. J Contam Hydrol 45:123–137
Bunn AL, Wellman DM, Deeb RA, Hawley EL, Truex MJ, Peterson M, Freshley MD, Pierce EM, McCord J, Young MH, Gilmore TJ, Miller R, Miracle AL, Kaback D, Eddy-Dilek C, Rossabi J, Lee H, Bush RP, Beam P, Chamberlain GM, Whitehurst L, Gerdes KD, Collazo Y (2012) Scientific opportunities for monitoring of environmental remediation sites—(SOMERS). DOE/PNNL-21379, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA USA
Corbo P, Kantelo MV, Fliermans CB (1985) Analytical results, database management and quality assurance for analyses of soil cores from the F- and H-area seepage basins. DPST-85-921. Du Pont de Nemours (E.I.) and Co., Aiken, SC
Cox B, Wills P, Kiyaschenko D, Mestayer J, Lopez J, Bourne S, Lupton R, Solano G, Henderson N, Hill D, Roy J (2012) Distributed acoustic sensing for geophysical measurement, monitoring, and verification. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysics Recorder, February 2012:7–13
Christensen JN, Dafflon B, Shiel AE, Tokunaga TK, Wan JM, Faybishenko B, Dong WM, Williams KH, Hobson C, Brown ST, Hubbard SS (2018) Using strontium isotopes to evaluate the spatial variation of groundwater recharge. Sci Total Environ 637:672–685
Dafflon B, Irving J, Barrash W (2011) Inversion of multiple intersecting high-resolution crosshole GPR profiles for hydrological characterization at the Boise hydrogeophysical research site. J Appl Geophys 73:305–314
Dafflon B, Wu Y, Hubbard SS, Birkholzer JT, Daley TM, Pugh JD, Trautz RC (2013) Monitoring CO2 intrusion and associated geochemical transformations in a shallow groundwater system using complex electrical methods. Environ Sci Technol 47(1):314–321
Daley TM, Freifeld BM, Ajo-Franklin JB, Dou S, Pevzner R, Shulakova V, Kashikar S, Miller DE, Goetz J, Henninges J, Lueth S (2013) Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring. Lead Edge 32(6):699–706
Dam WL, Campbell S, Johnson RH, Looney BB, Denham ME, Eddy-Dilek CA, Babits SJ (2015) Refining the site conceptual model at a former uranium mill site in Riverton, Wyoming, USA. Environmental Earth Sciences 74(10):7255–7265
Danielson TL (2020) Sensor recommendation for long-term monitoring of the F-area seepage basins. SRNL-STI-2020-00208. Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken SC
Declercq I, Cappuyns V, Duclos Y (2012) Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) of contaminated soils: State of the art in Europe—a critical evaluation. Sci Total Environ 426:393–405
Denham M, Vangelas K (2008) Biogeochemical gradients as a framework for understanding waste-site evolution. Remediation 19:5–17
Dong W, Tokunaga TK, Davis JA, Wan J (2012) Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-area Savannah River Site. Environ Sci Technol 46:1565–1571
Dou S, Wood T, Ajo-Franklin J, Robertson M, Daley T, Freifeld B, Pevzner R, Gurevich B (2017) Surface orbital vibrator for permanent seismic monitoring: A signal contents and repeatability appraisal. SEG Tech Program Expanded Abstr 2017:5906–5910.
Drever JI (1997) Geochemistry of natural waters: the surface and groundwater environments. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack FMG (2009) Trace metal behavior in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:3972–3985
Evanko CR, Dzombak DA (1997) Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater. Technical Evaluation Report TE-97-01, Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Pittsburgh, PA USA
Frohne T, Rinklebe J, Diaz-Bone RA, Du Laing G (2011) Controlled variation of redox conditions in a floodplain soil: impact on metal mobilization and biomethylation of arsenic and antimony. Geoderma 160:414–424
Frings J (2011) Enhanced pipeline monitoring with fiber optic sensors. In: Proceedings of the 16 Pipeline Technology Conference, Hannover, Germnay
Fytas K (2010) Use of permeable reactive barriers to treat acid mine effluents. Int J Min Reclam Environ 24:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930903305929
Gaebler W (1984) “Characteristics of fiber optic radiation detectors”, Proceedings SPIE Vo. 403: Optical fibers in broadband networks, instrumentation and urban and industrial environments, p 142–145, Paris France
Gambrell RP (1994) Trace and toxic metals in wetlands—a review. J Environ Qual 23:883–891
Gasperikova E, Hubbard S, Watson D, Bake G, Peterson J, Kowalsky M, Smith M, Brooks S (2013) Long-term electrical resistivity monitoring of recharge-induced contaminant plume behavior. J Contam Hydrol 142-143:33–49
Genelle F, Sirieix C, Riss J, Naudet V (2012) Monitoring landfill cover by electrical resistivity tomography on an experimental site. Eng Geol 145-146:18–29
Haefner A, Gunter D, Barnowski R, Vetter K (2015) A filtered back-projection algorithm for 4π compton camera data. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 62(4):1911–1917
Harre K, Chaundry T, Greenwald R, Weiwei J, Davis C, Zavislak M Minsker B (2009) Adaptive long-term monitoring at environmental restoration sites. ESTCP Project ER-0629 Final Report. US Department of Defense, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Port Hueneme CA USA
Hartog AH (2017) An introduction to distributed optical fibre sensors. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL USA
Hashim MA, Mukhopadhyay S, Sahu JN, Sengupta B (2011) Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. J Environ Manag 92:2355–2388
Hsi C-KD, Langmuir D (1985) Adsorption of uranyl onto ferric oxyhydroxides: application of the surface complexation site-binding model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49:1931–1941
Hunter P, Cameron K, Stewart R (2011) Demonstration and validation of GTS long-term monitoring optimization software at military and government sites. ESTCP Project ER-200714. US Department of Defense, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Arlington, VA USA
IAEA (2004) Remediation of sites with dispersed radioactive contamination. Technical Report Series No. 424. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
IAEA (2006) Applicability of monitored natural attenuation at radioactively contaminated sites. Technical Report Series No. 445. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
ITRC (2007) Protocol for use of five passive samplers to sample for a variety of contaminants in groundwater. DSP-5, Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Diffusion/Passive Sampler Team. www.itrcweb.org
ITRC (2010) A decision framework for applying monitored natural attenuation processes to metals and radionuclides in groundwater. APMR-1. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Attenuation Processes for Metals and Radionuclides Team, Washington DC. www.itrcweb.org
Janot N, Lezama Pacheco JS, Pham DQ, O’Brien TM, Hausladen D, Noël V, Lallier F, Maher K, Fendorf S, Williams KH, Long PE, Bargar JR (2015) Physico-chemical heterogeneity of organic-rich sediments in the Rifle Aquifer, CO: impact on uranium biogeochemistry. Environ Sci Technol 50:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03208
Jurkovič L, Majzlan J, Hiller E, Klimko T, Voleková-Lalinská B, Méres S, Göttlicher J, Steininger R (2019) Natural attenuation of antimony and arsenic in soils at the abandoned Sb-deposit Poproč, Slovakia. Environ Earth Sci 78(24):1–13
Johnson T, Versteeg R, Thomle J, Hammond G, Chen X, Zachara J (2015) Four‐dimensional electrical conductivity monitoring of stage‐driven river water intrusion: accounting for water table effects using a transient mesh boundary and conditional inversion constraints. Water Resour Res 51:6177–6196
Johnson TC, Versteeg RJ, Rockhold M, Slater LD, Ntarlagiannis D, Greenwood WJ, Zachara J (2012) Characterization of a contaminated wellfield using 3D electrical resistivity tomography implemented with geostatistical, discontinuous boundary, and known conductivity constraints. Geophysics 77(6):EN85–EN96
Johnson TC, Versteeg RJ, Ward A, Day-Lewis FD, Revil A (2010) Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time-domain resistivity and induced-polarization data. Geophysics 75:WA27–WA41
Kerkez B, Glaser SD, Bales RC, Meadows MW (2012) Design and performance of a wireless sensor network for catchment‐scale snow and soil moisture measurements. Water Resour Res 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011214
Khan M, Mukherjee K, Shoukat R, Dong H (2017) A review on pH sensitive materials for sensors and detection methods. Microsyst Technol 23:4391–4404
Killian TH, Kolb NL, Corbo P, Marine IW (1987) Environmental information document: F-area seepage basins. DPST-85-704. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC
Kollat JB, Reed PM, Maxwell RM (2011) Many-objective groundwater monitoring network design using bias-aware ensemble Kalman filtering, evolutionary optimization, and visual analytics. Water Resour Res 47:W0259. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009194
Krishna K, Kurakalva RM, Murthy N (2010) Monitored natural attenuation as a remediation tool for heavy metal contamination in soils in an abandoned gold mine area. Curr Sci 99:628–635
Krohn D, Nicholls P (2009) Fiber optic sensor applications in transportation infrastructure protection. In: Photonics in the transportation industry: auto to aerospace 2, proceedings of SPIE, vol 7314, SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, Orlando FL USA
LaPointe F, Fytas K, McConchie D (2005) Using permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of acid rock drainage. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 19:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13895260500045241
Langmuir D (1978) Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:547–569
Lee DR, Hartwig DS (2005) Zeolite prevents discharge of strontium-90-contaminated groundwater. Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Ontario, ISBN 0-919784-81-X
Liao Q, Deng Y, Shi X, Sun Y, Duan W, Wu J (2018) Delineation of contaminant plume for an inorganic contaminated site using electrical resistivity tomography: comparison with direct-push technique. Environ Monit Assess 190(4):1–17
Li D, Kaplan DI, Chang H-S, Seaman JC, Jaffe PR, Koster van Groos P, Scheckel KG, Segre CU, Chen N, Jiang D-T, Newville M, Lanzirotti A (2015) Spectroscopic evidence of uranium immobilization in acidic wetlands by natural organic matter and plant roots. Environ Sci Technol 49:2823–2832
Li D, Seaman JC, Chang H-S, Jaffe PR, Koster van Groos P, Jiang D-T, Chen N, Lin J, Arthur Z, Pan Y, Scheckel KG, Newville M, Lanzirotti A, Kaplan DI (2014) Retention and chemical speciation of uranium in an oxidized wetland sediment from the Savannah River Site. J Environ Radioact 131:40–46
Libera A, de Barros F, Faybishenko B, Eddy-Dilek C, Denham M, Lipnikov K, Moulton D, Maco B, Wainwright H (2019) Climate change impact on residual contaminants under sustainable remediation. J Contam Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103518
Lindsey NJ, Martin ER, Dreger DS, Freifeld B, Cole S, James SR, Biondi BL, Ajo‐Franklin JB (2017) Fiber‐optic network observations of earthquake wavefields. Geophys Res Lett 44(23):11–792
Liu J, Gu J, Li H, Carlson KH (2020) Machine learning and transport simulations for groundwater anomaly detection. J Comput Appl Math 380:112982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.112982
Loaiciga HA, Charbeneau RJ, Everett LG, Fogg GE, Hobbs BF, Rouhani S (1992) Review of ground-water quality monitoring network design. J Hydraulic Eng 118:11–37
Looney BB, Denham ME, Eddy-Dilek CA (2014) Independent technical evaluation and recommendations for contaminated groundwater at the Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Riverton Processing Site. Report No. STI-2014-00163. Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC
Lopez-Higuera JM, Cobo LR, Incera AQ, Cobo A (2011) Fiber optic sensors in structural health monitoring. J Lightwave Technol 29(4):587–608
Lu F, Wright RF, Lu P, Ohodnicki PR Jr (2019) Distributed fiber optic pH sensor for the application in the well bore. The Electrochemical Society Abstracts, Pennington, NJ USA
Luo Q, Wu J, Yang Y, Qian J, Wu J (2016) Multi-objective optimization of long-term groundwater monitoring network design using a probabilistic Pareto genetic algorithm under uncertainty. J Hydrol 534:352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.009
Majone M, Verdini R, Aulenta F, Rossetti S, Tandoi V, Kalogerakis N, Agathos S, Puig S, Zanaroli G, Fava F (2015) In situ groundwater and sediment bioremediation: barriers and perspectives at European contaminated sites. N Biotechnol 32(1):133–146
Manfreda S, McCabe MF, Miller PE, Lucas R, Madrigal VP, Mallinis G, Dor EB, Helman D, Estes L, Ciraolo G, Müllerová J, Tauro F, de Lima MI, de Lima JLMP, Maltese A, Frances F, Caylor K, Kohv M, Perks M, Ruiz-Pérez G, Su Z, Vico G, Toth B (2018) On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sens 10:641. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040641
Mangold D, Tsang C (1991) A summary of subsurface hydrological and hydrochemical models. Rev Geophys 29(1):51–79
McMillan L, Rivett M, Tellam J, Dumble P, Sharp H (2014) Influence of vertical flows in wells on groundwater sampling. J Contam Hydrol 169:50–61
NRC (2013) Alternatives for managing the nation’s complex contaminated groundwater sites. National Research Council, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NRC (1999) Environmental cleanup at naval facilities: risk-based methods. National Research Council, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Obiri-Nyarko F, Grajales-Mesa SJ, Malina G (2014) An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Chemosphere 111:243–259
Pádua L, Vanko J, Hruška J, Adão T, Sousa JJ, Peres E, Morais R (2017) UAS, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: a review towards practical applications. Int J Remote Sens 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1297548
Pavlovsky R, Haefner A, Joshi T, Negut V, McManus K, Suzuki E, Vetter K(2018) 3-D radiation mapping in real-time with the localization and mapping platform LAMP from unmanned aerial systems and man-portable configurations arXiv Prepr 1901:05038. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05038
Pellerin BA, Bergamaschi BA, Horsburgh JS (2012) In situ optical water quality sensor networks—Workshop Summary Report. USGS Open-File Report 2012-1044, vol 13, Reston VA USA
Potyrailo RA, Hieftje GM (1998) Advanced strategies for spatially resolved analyte mapping with distributed fiber-optic sensors for environmental and process applications. In: Proceedings on the conference for environmental and remediation technologies, SPIE, vol 3534
Reed MR, Kollat JB (2013) Visual analytics clarify the scalability and effectiveness of massively parallel many-objective optimization: a groundwater monitoring design example. Adv Water Resour 56:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.01.011
Reed P, Minsker B (2004) Striking the balance: long-term groundwater monitoring design for conflicting objectives. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:140–149
Reed P, Minsker B, Goldberg D (2001) A multiobjective approach to cost effective long-term groundwater monitoring using an elitist nondominated sorted genetic algorithm with historical data. J Hydroinformatics 3:71–89
Reed P, Minsker B, Valocchi AJ (2000) Cost effective long-term groundwater monitoring design using a genetic algorithm and global mass interpolation. Water Resour Res 36:3731–3741
Ren H, Zhao Y, Wu X, Hu Z (2019) A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: current status and future perspectives. Int J Coal Sci Technol 6(3):320–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-019-00264-5
Rügner H, Finkel M, Kaschl A, Bittens M (2006) Application of monitored natural attenuation in contaminated land management—a review and recommended approach for Europe. Environ Sci Policy 9:568–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.06.001
Sakala E, Fourie F, Gomo M, Madzivire G (2020) Natural attenuation of acid mine drainage by various rocks in the Witbank, Ermelo and Highveld Coalfields, South Africa. Nonrenewable Resources 14:1–14
Sayde C, Gregory C, Gil‐Rodriguez M, Tufillaro N, Tyler S, van de Giesen N, English M, Cuenca R, Selker JS (2010) Feasibility of soil moisture monitoring with heated fiber optics. Water Resour Res https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007846
SCDHEC (2016) Reguation 61-71: well standards. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia SC. https://www.scdhec.gov/environment/bureau-water/water-regulations-standards/water-regulations-standards-well-standards
Schenato L (2017) A review of distributed fiber optic sensors for geo-hydrological applications. Appl Sci 7:896. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090896
Schmidt F, Wainwright HM, Faybishenko B, Denham M, Eddy-Dilek C (2018) In situ monitoring of groundwater contamination using the Kalman filter. Environ Sci Technol 52(13):7418–7425
Selker JS, Thévenaz L, Huwald H, Mallet A, Luxemburg W, van de Giesen N, Stejskal M, Zeman J, Westhoff M, Parlange MB (2006) Distributed fiber-optic temperature sensing for hydrologic systems. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005326
Shao L-Y, Yin M-J, Tam H-Y, Albert J (2013) Fiber optic pH sensor with self-assembled polymer multilayer nanocoatings. Sensors 13:1425–1434
Singh KK, Frazier AE (2018) A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications. Int J Remote Sens https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1420941
Sirieix C, Genelle F, Barral C, Touze-Foltz N, Riss J, Bégassat B (2015) Characterizing the aging of a geosynthetic clay liner through electrical resistivity. Can Geotech J 52:1–8
Somogyvári M, Bayer P (2017) Field validation of thermal tracer tomography for reconstruction of aquifer heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 53(6):5070–5084
Strom RN, Kaback DS (1992) Groundwater geochemistry of the Savannah River Site and vicinity. WSRC-RP-92-450, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken SC. https://doi.org/10.2172/10103229
Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry: chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. John Wiley & Sons, New York NY USA
Suárez F, Hausner MB, Dozier J, Selker JS, Tyler SW (2011) Heat transfer in the environment: development and use of fiber-optic distributed temperature sensing. In: Bernardes MADS (ed) Developments in heat transfer, Chapter 31, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/822
Sun S (2013) A survey of multi-view machine learning. Neural Comput Appl 23(8):2031–2038
Sun D, Wainwright HM, Oroza CA, Seki A, Mikami S, Takemiya H, Saito K (2020) Optimizing long-term monitoring of radiation air-dose rates after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. J Environ Radioact 220:106281
Tmušić G, Manfreda S, Aasen H, James MR, Gonҫalves G, Ben-Dor E, Brook A, Ploinova M, Arranz JJ, Mészáros J, Zhuang R, Johansen K, Malbeteau Y, de Lima IP, Davids C, Herban S, McCabe MF (2020) Current practices in UAS-based environmental monitoring. Remote Sens 12:1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061001
Truex M, Oostrom M, Carroll KC, Bunn A, Wellman D (2013) Integrated systems-based approach to monitoring environmental remediation. In: Proceedings of the annual waste management symposium 2013. Phoenix AZ, Waste Management Symposium, Inc. Tempe AZ USA
Uhlemann S, Chambers J, Wilkinson P, Maurer H, Merritt A, Meldrum P, Kuras O, Gunn D, Smith T, Dijkstra T (2017) Four-dimensional imaging of moisture dynamics during landslide reactivation. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 122:398–418
USEPA (1999) Use of monitored natural attenuation at Superfund, RCRA corrective action and underground storage tanks. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Directive 9200.4–17P, Washington DC USA
USEPA (2004) Demonstration of two long-term groundwater monitoring optimization approaches. United States Environmental Protection Agency: EPA-542-R-04-001b, Washington DC USA
USEPA (2005a) Roadmap to long-term monitoring optimization. United States Environmental Protection Agency: EPA-542-R-05-003, Washington DC USA
USEPA (2005b) Groundwater sampling and monitoring with direct push technologies. United States Environmental Protection Agency: EPA 540/R-04/005, Washington DC USA
USEPA (2007a) In: Ford RG, Wilkin RT, Puls RW (eds) Monitored natural attenuation of inorganic contaminants in ground water: volume 1—technical basis. United States Environmental Protection Agency: EPA/600/R-07/139, Ada OK USA
USEPA (2007b) In: Ford RG, Wilkin RT, Puls RW (eds) Monitored natural attenuation of inorganic contaminants in groundwater, volume 2—assessment for non-radionulcides including arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, nitrate, perchlorate, and selenium. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/140, ADA OK USA
USEPA (2007c) In: Ford RG, Wilkin RT (eds) Monitored natural attenuation of inorganic contaminants in groundwater, volume 3 assessment for radionuclides including tritium, radon, strontium, technetium, uranium, iodine, radium, thorium, cesium, and plutonium-americium. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-10/093, ADA OK, USA
USEPA (2015) Use of monitored natural attenuation for inorganic contaminants in groundwater at superfund sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Directive 9283.1–36
Usher BH, Pretorius JA, Gebrekristos RA (2008) Guidelines for the acceptance of monitored natural attenuation processes in South Africa. Report to Water Research Commission, WRC 1501/4/08, ISBN 978-1-77005-666-4
Vázquez S, Hevia A, Moreno E, Esteban E, Peñalosa JM, Carpena RO (2011) Natural attenuation of residual heavy metal contamination in soils affected by the Aznalcóllar mine spill, SW Spain. J Environ Manag 92:2069–2075
Vetter K, Barnowski R, Cates JW, Haefner A, Joshi TH, Pavlovsky R, Quiter BJ (2019) Advances in nuclear radiation sensing: enabling 3-D gamma-ray vision. Sensors 19(11):2541
Wainwright H, Arora B, Hubbard SS, Lipnikov K, Moulton D, Flach G, Denham M (2019) Sustainable remediation in complex geologic systems. In: Evans WJ, Hanusa TP (eds.) The heaviest metals: science and technology of the actinides and beyond, Wiley, New York, pp. 415–426
Wainwright HM, Chen J, Sassen DS, Hubbard SS (2014) Bayesian hierarchical approach and geophysical data sets for estimation of reactive facies over plume scales. Water Resour Res 50:4564–4584. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013842
Wainwright HM, Faybishenko B, Molins S, Davis JA, Arora B, Pau G, Johnson J, Flach G, Denham M, Eddy-Dilek C, Moulton JD, Lipnikov K, Gable C, Miller T, Freshley M (2016) Effective long-term monitoring strategies by integrating reactive transport models with in situ geochemical measurements. In: Proceedings of the annual waste management symposium 2016. Phoenix AZ, Waste Management, Inc. Tempe AZ USA
Waite TD, Davis JA, Payne TE, Waychunas GA, Xu N (1994) Uranium(VI) adsorption to ferrihydrite: application of a surface complexation model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5465–5478
Wang T, Liu Y, Wang J, Wang X, Liu B, Wang Y (2019) In-situ remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated groundwater and saturated soil using stabilized iron sulfide nanoparticles. J Environ Manag 231:679–686
Weaver W, Wilson JT (2000) Diving plumes and vertical migration at petroleum hydrocarbon release sites. LUSTLine Bulletin 36, New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, Lowell, MA
Whitehead K, Hugenholtz CH (2014) Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 1: a review of progress and challenges. J Unmanned Veh Syst 2:69–85
Whitehead K, Hugenholtz CH, Myshak S, Brown O, LeClair A, Tamminga A, Barchyn TE, Moorman B, Eaton B (2014) Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 2: scientific and commercial applications. J Unmanned Veh Syst 2:86–102
Xu C, Zhang S, Ho Y-F, Miller EJ, Roberts KA, Li H-P, Schwehr KA, Otosaka S, Kaplan DI, Brinkmeyer R, Yeager CM, Santschi PH (2011) Is soil natural organic matter a sink or source for mobile radioiodine (129I) at the Savannah River Site? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:5716–5735