Implications of rational inattention

Journal of Monetary Economics - Tập 50 Số 3 - Trang 665-690 - 2003
Christopher A. Sims1
1Department of Economics, Princeton University, 104 Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1021, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abreu, 1988, The structure of Nash equilibrium in repeated games with finite automata, Econometrica, 56, 1259, 10.2307/1913097

Bénabou, R., Tirole, J., 2001. Self-knowledge and self-regulation: an economic approach. Technical Report, Princeton University.

Cover, 1991

Evans, 2001

Giannoni, M.P., 1999. Does model uncertainty justify caution? Robust optimal monetary policy in a forward-looking model. Discussion paper, Princeton University.

Gray, 2000, Quantization, 281

Gul, F., Pesendorfer, W., 2001. An economic theory of self control. Econometrica.

Hansen, 2001, Robust control and model uncertainty, American Economic Review, 91, 60, 10.1257/aer.91.2.60

Keating, J.W., 1997. Is sticky price adjustment important for output fluctuations? Technical Report, University of Kansas.

Laibson, 1997, Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443, 10.1162/003355397555253

Leeper, E.M., Sims, C.A., Zha, T., 1996. What does monetary policy do? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2.

Lucas, 1973, Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs, American Economic Review, 63, 326

Onatski, A., Stock, J.H., 1999. Robust monetary policy under model uncertainty in a small model of the U.S. economy. Harvard University, Manuscript.

Sargent, 1993

Schervish, 1995

Sims, 1998, Stickiness, Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series On Public Policy, 49, 317, 10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00013-5