Implications of Robot Actions for Human Perception. How Do We Represent Actions of the Observed Robots?

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 Số 3 - Trang 357-366 - 2014
Agnieszka Wykowska1, Ryan Chellali2, Mamun Amun al-Amin1, Hermann J. Müller1
1General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 , Munich, Germany
2Pattern Analysis and Computer Vision, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia-PAVIS, Via Morego, 30, 16165 , Genova, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Greenwald A (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychol Rev 77:73–99

Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878

Wykowska A, Schubö A, Hommel B (2009) How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. J Exp Psychol 35:1755–1769

Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press, Boston

Frith CD, Frith U (2006) How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res 1079:36–46

Decety D, Grèzes J (1999) Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci 3:172–178

Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlyingthe understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661–670

Schilbach L, Timmermans B et al (2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav Brain Sci 36:393–462

Kilner JM, Friston KJ, Frith CD (2007) Predicitve coding: an account of the mirror neurons system. Cogn Process 8:159–166

Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217

Hommel B (2010) Grounding attention in action control: the intentional control of selection. In: Bruya BJ (ed) Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and actio. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 121–140

Wykowska A, Hommel B, Schubö A (2011) Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Atten Percept Psychol 73:1034–1041

Wykowska A, Hommel B, Schubö A (2012) Imaging when acting: picture but not word cues induce action-related biases of visual attention. Front Psychol 3:388

Wykowska A, Schubö A (2012) Action intentions modulate allocation of visual attention: electrophysiological evidence. Front Psychol 3:379

Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani the uncanny valley (KF MacDorman, T Minato, Trans.). Energy 7:3335 (Originally in Japanese)

Saygin AP, Chaminade T, Ishiguro H, Driver J, Frith C (2012) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7:413–422

Moore RK (2012) A Bayesian explanation of the ‘uncanny valley’ effect and related psychological phenomena. Sci Rep 2:864. doi: 10.1038/srep00864

Freier NG, Kahn PH Jr (2009) The fast-paced change of children’s technological environments. Child Youth Environ 19:1–11

Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Press C, Bird G, Flach R, Heyes C (2005) Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cogn Brain Res 25:632–640

Anderson SJ, Yamagishi N (2000) Spatial localization of colour and luminance stimuli in human peripheral vision. Vis Res 40:759771

Cousineau D (2005) Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus & Masson’s method. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 1:42–45

Oberman LM, McCmeery JP, Ramachandran VS, Pineda JA (2007) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70:2194–2203

Oztop E, Franklin DW, Chaminade T, Cheng G (2005) Humanhumanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? Int J Hum Robot 2:537559

Press C, Gillmeister H, Heyes C (2006) Bottom-up, not top-down modualtion of imitation by human and robotic models. Eur J Neurosci 24:1–5

Chun MM, Wolfe JM (1996) Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cogn Psychol 30:39–78

Schubö A, Schröger E, Meinecke C (2004) Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study. Cognit Brain Res 21:317–334

Schubö A, Wykowska A, Müller HJ (2007) Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity: investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Brain Res 1138:136–147

Brayda L, Chellali R (2012) Measuring human-robot interactions. Int J Soc Robot. doi: 10.1007/s12369-012-0150

Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W (2007) Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends Cognit Sci 11:349–355

Bosbach S, Cole J, Prinz W, Knoblich G (2005) Inferring anothers expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation. Nat Neurosci 8:12951297