Impacts of honeybee density on crop yield: A meta‐analysis

Journal of Applied Ecology - Tập 56 Số 5 - Trang 1152-1163 - 2019
Orianne Rollin1, Lucas A. Garibaldi1
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD) Sede Andina Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) San Carlos de Bariloche Río Negro Argentina

Tóm tắt

Abstract There is increasing recognition that pollination deficits are limiting crop yields world‐wide. However, management strategies for optimal insect pollination are still unclear for most crops. Current management focuses on providing high densities of honeybees, but recommended densities are highly variable, even within single crops and cultivars. We performed an extensive literature search to record honeybee densities (colony density and/or flower visitation rates) and crop productivity (fruit set, seed set, fruit weight and/or yield). Effect sizes were represented as the difference in crop productivity between the two most extreme levels of honeybee densities. Out of 795 reviewed studies, only 22 analysed the effect of at least two levels of honeybee densities on crop productivity (reporting 60 resulting effect sizes in total). Moreover, few recommendations for crop pollination management are based on results from controlled experimental designs, and with comparable methodology. We found that both colony density and visitation rates increased all the productivity variables. However, effects were nonlinear for visitation rates, suggesting that there is an optimum (mean of 8–10 visits per flower) beyond which more honeybees are not beneficial (and can even be detrimental) for crop productivity. Effect sizes for visitation rates were greater than that for colony densities, suggesting that visitation rates are a more direct measure of the pollination process. Data on the relation between colony density and visitation rates are lacking. Interestingly, effect sizes for visitation rates were greater for crops with separate sexes than those with hermaphroditic flowers; therefore, the benefits of honeybee pollination vary according to the crop biology. Synthesis and applications. Current practices for crop pollination assume that more honeybees are always better for crop yield, even if the effect of this management on crop production still unclear. In contrast, our analyses suggest that there is an optimum for honeybee densities. Despite the importance of honeybees and pollinator‐dependent crops world‐wide, there is a lack of studies designed for finding such an optimal level of crop pollination. Our analyses further suggest that visitation rates could be used as a proxy to guide management recommendations such as colony density and spatial arrangement.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.066

10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071

10.1111/nph.12924

10.1093/jee/89.5.1080

10.1603/EC10431

Barbier E., 1986, La pollinisation des cultures: pourquoi? Comment

10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00924.x

10.1093/jee/88.6.1739

10.1016/j.agee.2011.09.005

10.1002/9780470743386

10.1098/rspb.2012.2767

10.1126/science.1232728

10.21273/HORTSCI.40.6.1705

10.1080/01140671.1993.9513767

10.4324/9780203819937

10.1016/j.baae.2012.08.013

10.1111/1365-2664.12573

10.1603/0022-0493-96.4.1215

10.1079/9780851994482.0000

10.3896/IBRA/1.52.1.03

10.1371/journal.pone.0150055

Department of Agriculture and Food. (2006).Bee pollination benefits for nut crops. Retrieved fromhttp://archive.agric.wa.gov.au/PC94129html?s=262070423

10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011

10.1093/jee/99.3.614

10.1371/journal.pbio.0040001

Free J. B., 1993, Insect pollination of crops

10.1080/00218839.1983.11100599

10.1890/ES15-00148.1

Gaines‐Day H. R., 2013, Do bees matter to cranberry? The effect of bees, landscape, and local management on cranberry yield

10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.001

10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.006

10.1371/journal.pone.0153889

10.1111/1365-2664.12530

10.1126/science.aac7287

10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.016

10.1126/science.1230200

10.1080/0028825X.2013.806934

10.1126/science.1255957

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19233.x

10.1080/09064710.2014.971051

10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00074.x

10.1890/09-0792.1

10.1111/ele.12657

10.1080/01140671.2001.9514160

10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.057

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01823.x

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195316957.001.0001

Le duc I., 2004, Manuel de lutte intégrée de la canneberge de l‘est canadien

10.1007/s00442-015-3517-x

Maisonnasse A., 2016, Evaluation de la structure des colonies d'abeilles, création et utilisation de la méthode ColEval (Colony Evaluation), Innovations Agronomiques, 53, 27

10.1371/journal.pone.0189268

10.1071/EA02170

10.1093/jee/58.5.968

10.1073/pnas.0408550102

10.56021/9780801885730

10.1007/s13592-014-0321-2

Morales C. L., 2009, Pollination requirement of raspberry in SW Argentina. Preliminary results, The International Journal of Plant Reproductive Biology, 1, 195

10.1890/08-2278.1

10.1590/S0103-90162009000400007

10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.05

10.1007/s13592-012-0125-1

10.1371/journal.pone.0070182

10.1007/s13592-013-0242-5

10.1016/j.eja.2016.04.001

R Development Core Team, 2017, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.4.2

10.1890/14-1011.1

10.1590/S0001-37652012005000057

10.1007/s13593-015-0342-x

10.1016/j.agee.2013.07.007

Rollin O., 2019, Data from: Impacts of honeybee density on crop yield: A meta‐analysis, Dryad Digital Repository

10.1007/s13592-013-0193-x

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.005

10.1111/1365-2664.12325

10.1603/0022-0493-93.6.1726

10.1080/14620316.2007.11512278

10.1515/9781400857876

Sheffield C., 2016, A manual on apple pollination

10.1051/apido:2003015

10.1080/14620316.2001.11511320

10.1080/14620316.2004.11511821

10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.671.17

10.1051/apido:2000158

10.1111/1365-2664.12945

10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x

10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.288.58

Vaissière B., 2011, Protocol to detect and assess pollination deficits in crops: A handbook for its use

10.1051/apido:2006019

10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1268

10.21273/HORTSCI.41.2.370

10.1093/jee/tov096

10.2307/1941033

10.2307/1940770

10.1371/journal.pone.0121143