Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics - Tập 13 Số 8 - Trang 1103-1108 - 1999
Venturi1, Paolo Gionchetti1, Fernando Rizzello1, Eva Johansson1, Zucconi1, Patrizia Brigidi2, Matteuzzi2, Massimo Campieri1
1Department of Internal Medicine & Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Italy.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy

Tóm tắt

Background

: Although 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) oral compounds are the standard maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis in remission, some patients cannot use them because of side‐effects. Clinical and experimental observations have suggested the potential role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease therapy.

Aim

: To evaluate the effects on intestinal microflora and the clinical efficacy of a new probiotic preparation in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

Patients and methods

: Twenty patients with ulcerative colitis, intolerant or allergic to 5‐ASA, have been treated with a new probiotic preparation (VSL # 3, CSL, Milan, Italy) containing 5 × 1011 cells/g of 3 strains of bifidobacteria, 4 strains of lactobacilli and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus. Two doses of 3 g were administered o.d. for 12 months. Faecal samples for stool culture were obtained from the patients at the beginning of the trial and after 10, 20, 40, 60, 75, 90 days, 12 months and at 15 days after the end of the treatment. The following bacterial groups have been evaluated in the faeces: total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, enterococci, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms. Patients were assessed clinically every two months, and assessed endoscopically at 6 and 12 months or in relapse.

Results

: Faecal concentrations of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria increased significantly in all patients, compared to their basal level, from the 20th day of treatment (P < 0.05) and remained stable throughout the study. Concentrations of Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms, total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria did not change significantly during treatment (P = N.S.). Fifteen of 20 treated patients remained in remission during the study, one patient was lost to follow up, while the remaining relapsed. No significant side‐effects have been reported.

Conclusions

: These results show that this probiotic preparation is able to colonize the intestine, and suggest that it may be useful in maintaining the remission in ulcerative colitis patients intolerant or allergic to 5‐ASA. Controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary results.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Dissanayake AS, 1973, A controlled therapeutic trial of sulphasalazine, Gut, 14, 93

10.1056/NEJM197309062891001

CampieriM&GionchettiP. The use of salicylates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical Challenges in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis Prognosis and Treatment. Falk Symposium. Lancaster UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997:1415.

10.7326/0003-4819-118-7-199304010-00009

Sartor RB, 1997, Pathogenesis and immune mechanisms of chronic inflammatory bowel Disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 2, 5S

10.1136/gut.32.4.439

10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8690198

10.1159/000201045

Madsen KL, 1997, Lactobacillus sp prevents developments of enterocolitis in interleukin‐10 gene deficient mice, Gastroenterology, 112, A 1030

Schultz M, 1988, Continuous feeding of lactobacillus plantarum attenuates estabilished colitis in interleukin‐10 deficient mice, Gastroenterology, 114, 4

10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00225.x

Rembacken BJ, 1997, A double blind trial of non pathogenic IX. coli vs mesalazine for the treatment of ulcerative colits, Gut, 41, 3911

10.1136/bmj.1.5375.89

10.1136/bmj.1.4979.1315

SummanenP&BaronEJ et al. eds.Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual Fifth Edition. Singapore: STAR Publishers Co 1993.

BiavatiB SgorbatiB ScardoviV.The genusBifidobacterium.In: Balows A Tripes HG Dworkin M Harder W Schleifer KH eds. The Prokariotes Handbook on the Biology of the Bacteria. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag 1992: 816–33.

10.1136/gut.42.1.2

10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02471.x

SalminenS DeightonM GorbachS.Lactic acid bacteria in health and diseaseIn:von : Salminen S Wright A eds. Lactic Acid Bacteria. New York: Dekker 1993: 199–225.

10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb01520.x

10.1159/000177907

10.3109/08910608909140210

10.3109/07853899009147239

McDonought FE, 1983, Role of vitamins and mineral in growth stimulation of rats fed yogurt, Fed Proc, 42, 556

Gionchetti P, 1988, Maintenance treatment of chronic pouchitis: a randomised placebo‐controlled trial with a new probiotic preparation, Gastroenterology, 114, 4

10.1016/S0924-2244(00)89085-8

10.1016/S0261-5614(96)80253-6

10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01224-4