Impact of short-rotation Acacia hybrid plantations on soil properties of degraded lands in Central Vietnam

Soil Research - Tập 52 Số 3 - Trang 271 - 2014
Tran Lam Dong1,2, RB Doyle2, C. L. Beadle3,2, Ross Corkrey2, Nguyen Xuan Quat4
1Silviculture Research Institute, Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, Dong Ngac, Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam.
2Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA) and School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
3CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Private Bag 12, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
4Vietnam Association of Forest Sciences and Technology, 114 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Tóm tắt

Acacia hybrid (A. mangium × A. auriculiformis) is the main species planted for short-rotation forestry in Vietnam. In this study, the effect of these plantations on some key properties of degraded gravelly soils in Central Vietnam was assessed. Soil samples were collected from second- or third-rotation plantations representative of five age classes (0.5–5 years old), and in adjacent abandoned lands as controls. Compared with abandoned land, stock of total soil carbon (C) was significantly higher at ages 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 and 5 years (18.4–19.5 v. 13.0 Mg ha–1), total nitrogen (N) at 0.5 and 1.5 years (1.5–1.7 v. 1.0 Mg ha–1), exchangeable calcium at 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 years (215–294 v. 42 Mg ha–1), magnesium at 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 years (39–48 v. 19 Mg ha–1), and sodium at all ages (46–59 v. 5 Mg ha–1). Electrical conductivity was significantly higher at all ages (58.5–69.4 v. 32.7 µS cm–1). Differences in extractable phosphorus and exchangeable potassium were not significantly different between plantations and abandoned land. Bulk density was significantly lower in plantations than abandoned land at all ages (1.36–1.42 v. 1.55 Mg ha–1), pHCaCl2 at 0.5 and 5 years (3.78–3.84 v. 3.98), and pHH2O at 5 years (4.30 v. 4.52). Because the soils were gravelly, differences in concentration of total C and nutrients between abandoned land and plantations were not the same as those for stocks after correction for gravel content and bulk density. Within a rotation, most soil properties did not change significantly with plantation age, although they appeared to decrease during the first 3 years; total C then recovered to initial levels, but total N and exchangeable cations remained lower. Some soil properties were strongly related to gravel content and elevation, but not to growth rate. We conclude that consecutive plantings of short-rotation Acacia hybrid on degraded and abandoned land can lead to changes in some soil properties.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amat, 2010, Bois et Forests des Tropiques, 305, 67, 10.19182/bft2010.305.a20440

Astera, 2010, ACRES, 40

Bernhard-Reversat, 1996, Applied Soil Ecology, 4, 161, 10.1016/0929-1393(96)00096-0

Cole, 1996, Forest Ecology and Management, 80, 175, 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03610-5

Craswell, 2001, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 61, 7, 10.1023/A:1013656024633

Dunnett, 1955, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096, 10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294

El Tahir, 2009, Journal of Arid Environments, 73, 499, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.11.007

Forrester, 2006, Forest Ecology and Management, 233, 211, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012

Galiana, 2002, Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34, 251, 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00179-1

Gersani, 2001, Journal of Ecology, 89, 660, 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00609.x

Haynes, 1990, Plant and Soil, 126, 247, 10.1007/BF00012828

Heneghan, 2008, Restoration Ecology, 16, 608, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x

Kasongo, 2009, Soil Use and Management, 25, 21, 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00188.x

Lal, 1996, Land Degradation & Development, 7, 19, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199603)7:1<19::AID-LDR212>3.0.CO;2-M

Lal, 1996, Land Degradation & Development, 7, 99, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199606)7:2<99::AID-LDR220>3.0.CO;2-F

Lal, 1997, Land Degradation & Development, 8, 95, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199706)8:2<95::AID-LDR241>3.0.CO;2-K

Lal, 1989, Land Degradation & Rehabilitation, 1, 51, 10.1002/ldr.3400010106

Li, 2000, Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 321

Li, 2001, Plant and Soil, 229, 105, 10.1023/A:1004832013143

Macedo, 2008, Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1516, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.007

McNamara, 2006, Forest Ecology and Management, 233, 358, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.033

Norisada, 2005, Forest Science, 51, 498, 10.1093/forestscience/51.5.498

O?Brien, 2008, Journal of Ecology, 96, 438, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01354.x

Paul, 2002, Forest Ecology and Management, 168, 241, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00740-X

Sang, 2013, Plant and Soil, 362, 187, 10.1007/s11104-012-1281-9

Schiavo, 2009, Scientia Agr�cola, 66, 353, 10.1590/S0103-90162009000300010

Sprent, 1999, Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2, 149, 10.1078/1433-8319-00068

Sun, 1992, Forest Ecology and Management, 55, 209, 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90101-E

Tang, 1997, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 37, 563, 10.1071/EA96151

Tang, 1999, New Phytologist, 143, 513, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00475.x

Tsukamoto, 2005, Pedobiologia, 49, 69, 10.1016/j.pedobi.2004.08.007

Walker, 1976, Geoderma, 15, 1, 10.1016/0016-7061(76)90066-5

Wang, 2010, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 56, 297, 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00454.x

Wang, 2010, Restoration Ecology, 18, 313, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00642.x

Yamashita, 2008, Forest Ecology and Management, 254, 362, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.012

Yang, 2009, Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1786, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.033

Y�ksek, 2010, Land Degradation & Development, 21, 582, 10.1002/ldr.1000