Impact of process temperature and organic loading rate on cellulolytic / hydrolytic biofilm microbiomes during biomethanation of ryegrass silage revealed by genome-centered metagenomics and metatranscriptomics
Tóm tắt
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of protein-rich grass silage was performed in experimental two-stage two-phase biogas reactor systems at low vs. increased organic loading rates (OLRs) under mesophilic (37 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) temperatures. To follow the adaptive response of the biomass-attached cellulolytic/hydrolytic biofilms at increasing ammonium/ammonia contents, genome-centered metagenomics and transcriptional profiling based on metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) were conducted. In total, 78 bacterial and archaeal MAGs representing the most abundant members of the communities, and featuring defined quality criteria were selected and characterized in detail. Determination of MAG abundances under the tested conditions by mapping of the obtained metagenome sequence reads to the MAGs revealed that MAG abundance profiles were mainly shaped by the temperature but also by the OLR. However, the OLR effect was more pronounced for the mesophilic systems as compared to the thermophilic ones. In contrast, metatranscriptome mapping to MAGs subsequently normalized to MAG abundances showed that under thermophilic conditions, MAGs respond to increased OLRs by shifting their transcriptional activities mainly without adjusting their proliferation rates. This is a clear difference compared to the behavior of the microbiome under mesophilic conditions. Here, the response to increased OLRs involved adjusting of proliferation rates and corresponding transcriptional activities. The analysis led to the identification of MAGs positively responding to increased OLRs. The most outstanding MAGs in this regard, obviously well adapted to higher OLRs and/or associated conditions, were assigned to the order Clostridiales (Acetivibrio sp.) for the mesophilic biofilm and the orders Bacteroidales (Prevotella sp. and an unknown species), Lachnospirales (Herbinix sp. and Kineothrix sp.) and Clostridiales (Clostridium sp.) for the thermophilic biofilm. Genome-based metabolic reconstruction and transcriptional profiling revealed that positively responding MAGs mainly are involved in hydrolysis of grass silage, acidogenesis and / or acetogenesis. An integrated -omics approach enabled the identification of new AD biofilm keystone species featuring outstanding performance under stress conditions such as increased OLRs. Genome-based knowledge on the metabolic potential and transcriptional activity of responsive microbiome members will contribute to the development of improved microbiological AD management strategies for biomethanation of renewable biomass.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–60.
Nizami AS, Korres NE, Murphy JD. Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:8496–508.
Schönberg M, Linke B. The influence of the temperature regime on the formation of methane in a two-phase anaerobic digestion process. Eng Life Sci. 2012;12:279–86.
Pohl M, Heeg K, Mumme J. Anaerobic digestion of wheat straw – performance of continuous solid-state digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:408–15.
Shen F, Yuan H, Pang Y, Chen S, Zhu B, Zou D, et al. Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit & vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW): single-phase vs. two-phase. Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:80–5.
Linke B, Rodríguez-Abalde Á, Jost C, Krieg A. Performance of a novel two-phase continuously fed leach bed reactor for demand-based biogas production from maize silage. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:34–40.
Habouzit F, Hamelin J, Santa-Catalina G, Steyer J-P, Bernet N. Biofilm development during the start-up period of anaerobic biofilm reactors: the biofilm Archaea community is highly dependent on the support material. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7:257–64.
Zakrzewski M, Goesmann A, Jaenicke S, Jünemann S, Eikmeyer F, Szczepanowski R, et al. Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing. J Biotechnol. 2012;158:248–58.
Langer S, Schropp D, Bengelsdorf FR, Othman M, Kazda M. Dynamics of biofilm formation during anaerobic digestion of organic waste. Anaerobe. 2014;29:44–51.
Maus I, Koeck DE, Cibis KG, Hahnke S, Kim YS, Langer T, et al. Unraveling the microbiome of a thermophilic biogas plant by metagenome and metatranscriptome analysis complemented by characterization of bacterial and archaeal isolates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:171.
Maus I, Rumming M, Bergmann I, Heeg K, Pohl M, Nettmann E, et al. Characterization of Bathyarchaeota genomes assembled from metagenomes of biofilms residing in mesophilic and thermophilic biogas reactors. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:167.
Rademacher A, Nolte C, Schönberg M, Klocke M. Temperature increases from 55 to 75 °C in a two-phase biogas reactor result in fundamental alterations within the bacterial and archaeal community structure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:565–76.
Kouzuma A, Tsutsumi M, Ishii S, Ueno Y, Abe T, Watanabe K. Non-autotrophic methanogens dominate in anaerobic digesters. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1510.
Bremges A, Maus I, Belmann P, Eikmeyer F, Winkler A, Albersmeier A, et al. Deeply sequenced metagenome and metatranscriptome of a biogas-producing microbial community from an agricultural production-scale biogas plant. Gigascience. 2015;4:33.
Hassa J, Maus I, Off S, Pühler A, Scherer P, Klocke M, et al. Metagenome, metatranscriptome, and metaproteome approaches unraveled compositions and functional relationships of microbial communities residing in biogas plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:5045–63.
Heyer R, Kohrs F, Reichl U, Benndorf D. Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8:749–63.
Campanaro S, Treu L, Kougias PG, De Francisci D, Valle G, Angelidaki I. Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high throughput shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:26.
Kougias PG, Campanaro S, Treu L, Zhu X, Angelidaki I. A novel archaeal species belonging to Methanoculleus genus identified via de-novo assembly and metagenomic binning process in biogas reactors. Anaerobe. 2017;46:23–32.
Maus I, Bremges A, Stolze Y, Hahnke S, Cibis KG, Koeck DE, et al. Genomics and prevalence of bacterial and archaeal isolates from biogas-producing microbiomes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:264.
Maus I, Cibis KG, Bremges A, Stolze Y, Wibberg D, Tomazetto G, et al. Genomic characterization of Defluviitoga tunisiensis L3, a key hydrolytic bacterium in a thermophilic biogas plant and its abundance as determined by metagenome fragment recruitment. J Biotechnol. 2016;232:50–60.
Campanaro S, Treu L, Rodriguez-R L, Kovalöovszki A, Ziels R, Maus I, et al. The anaerobic digestion microbiome: a collection of 1600 metagenome-assembled genomes shows high species diversity related to methane production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1101/680553.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Sikora A, Detman A, Mielecki D, Chojnacka A, Błaszczyk M. Searching for metabolic pathways of anaerobic digestion: a useful list of the key enzymes. Biogas. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81256.
Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, Xu Y. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W445–51.
Sundberg C, Al-Soud WA, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta SE, Svensson BH, et al. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbial Ecol. 2013;85:612–26.
Lv Z, Wu X, Zhou B, Wang Y, Sun Y, Wang Y, et al. Effect of one step temperature increment from mesophilic to thermophilic anaerobic digestion on the linked pattern between bacterial and methanogenic communities. Bioresour Technol. 2019;292:121968.
Munk B, Guebitz GM, Lebuhn M. Influence of nitrogen-rich substrates on biogas production and on the methanogenic community under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Anaerobe. 2017;46:146–54.
Shin SG, Han G, Lee J, Shin J, Hwang S. A snapshot of microbial community structures in 20 different field-scale anaerobic bioreactors treating food waste. J Environ Manag. 2019;248:109297.
Stolze Y, Bremges A, Rumming M, Henke C, Maus I, Pühler A, et al. Identification and genome reconstruction of abundant distinct taxa in microbiomes from one thermophilic and three mesophilic production-scale biogas plants. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:156.
Bassini JP, Diass N, Caoe SMS, .Senra E, Laranjeira Y, Dezotti M. Effect of increasing organic loading rates on the performance of moving-bed biofilm reactors filled with different support media: assessing the activity of suspended and attached biomass fractions. Proc Saf Environ Protect 2016;100:131–141.
Liu C, Wang W, Anwar N, Ma Z, Liu G, Zhang R. Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Energy Fuel. 2017;31:2976–84.
Kovács E, Wirth R, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Rákhely G, Kovács KL. Biogas production from protein-rich biomass: fed-batch anaerobic fermentation of casein and of pig blood and associated changes in microbial community composition. PLoS One. 2013;16:e77265.
Westerholm M, Schnürer A. Microbial responses to different operating practices for biogas production systems. Anaerobic Digestion. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82815.
Zhang L, Ban Q, Li J. Microbial community dynamics at high organic loading rates revealed by pyrosequencing during sugar refinery wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2018;12:4.
Leite AF, Janke L, Lv Z, Harms H, Richnow HH, Nikolausz M. Improved monitoring of semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of sugarcane waste: effects of increasing organic loading rate on methanogenic community dynamics. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;25:23210–26.
Xu R, Yang ZH, Zheng Y, Liu JB, Xiong WP, Zhang YR, et al. Organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time shape distinct ecological networks of anaerobic digestion related microbiome. Bioresour Technol. 2018;262:184–93.
Ben Hania W, Godbane R, Postec A, Hamdi M, Ollivier B, Fardeau ML. Defluviitoga tunisiensis gen. Nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic bacterium isolated from a mesothermic and anaerobic whey digester. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:1377–82.
Zhang L, Loh KC, Sarvanantharajah S, Tong YW, Wang CH, Dai Y. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature. Bioresour Technol. 2018;288:121597.
Treu L, Kougias PG, Campanaro S, Bassani I, Angelidaki I. Deeper insight into the structure of the anaerobic digestion microbial community; the biogas microbiome database is expanded with 157 new genomes. Bioresour Technol. 2016;2016:260266.
Zhou J, Deng Y, Luo F, He Z, Tu Q, Zhi X. Functional molecular ecological networks. MBio. 2010;2010;1.
Zhou J, Deng Y, Luo F, He Z, Yang Y. Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. mBio. 2011;2:e00122–11.
Yang J, Li G, Qian Y, Yang Y, Zhang F. Microbial functional gene patterns related to soil greenhouse gas emissions in oil contaminated areas. Sci Total Environ. 2018;628–629:94–102.
Louca S, Polz MF, Mazel F, Albright MBN, Huber JA, O’Connor MI, et al. Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nature Ecol Evol. 2018;2:936.
Bilen M, Dufour J-C, Lagier J-C, Cadoret F, Daoud Z, Dubourg G, et al. The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species. Microbiome. 2018;6:94.
Theuerl S, Kohrs F, Benndorf D, Maus I, Wibberg D, Schlüter A, et al. Community shifts in a well-operating agricultural biogas plant: how process variations are handled by the microbiome. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:7791–803.
Klang J, Theuerl S, Szewzyk U, Huth M, Tölle R, Klocke M. Dynamic variation of the microbial community structure during the long-time mono-fermentation of maize and sugar beet silage. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8:764–75.
Maus I, Kim YS, Wibberg D, Stolze Y, Off S, Antonczyk S, et al. Biphasic study to characterize agricultural biogas plants by high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and microscopic analysis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27:321–34.
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1.
Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–63.
Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
Hyatt D, LoCascio PF, Hauser LJ, Uberbacher EC. Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2223–30.
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.
Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H-J, Weber N, Schuster SC. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 2011;21:1552–60.
Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1165.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;15:166–9.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
A toolkit for assigning objective taxonomic classifications to bacterial and archaeal genomes.: Ecogenomics/GTDBTk. Python. Australian Centre for Ecogenomics; 2018. https://github.com/Ecogenomics/GTDBTk. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
Jünemann S, Kleinbölting N, Jaenicke S, Henke C, Hassa J, Nelkner J, et al. Bioinformatics for NGS-based metagenomics and the application to biogas research. J Biotechnol. 2017;261:10–23.