Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial
Tóm tắt
The impact of antithrombin III activity (AT-III) on prophylactic enoxaparin anti-factor Xa concentration (anti-Xa) is unknown in high-risk trauma patients. So too is the optimal anti-Xa-adjusted enoxaparin dosage. This prospective, randomized, pilot study sought to explore the association between AT-III and anti-Xa goal attainment and to preliminarily evaluate two enoxaparin dosage adjustment strategies in patients with subprophylactic anti-Xa. Adult trauma patients with Risk Assessment Profile (RAP) ≥ 5 prescribed enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously every 12 h were eligible. AT-III and anti-Xa were drawn 8 h after the third enoxaparin dose and compared between patients with anti-Xa ≥ 0.1 IU/mL (goal; control group) or anti-Xa < 0.1 IU/mL (subprophylactic; intervention group). The primary outcome was difference in baseline AT-III. Subsequently, intervention group patients underwent 1:1 randomization to either enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 h (up to 50 mg every 12 h if repeat anti-Xa < 0.1 IU/mL) (enox12) or enoxaparin 30 mg every 8 h (enox8) with repeat anti-Xa assessments. The proportion of patients achieving goal anti-Xa after dosage adjustment were compared. A total of 103 patients were included. Anti-Xa was subprophylactic in 50.5%. Baseline AT-III (median [IQR]) was 87% [80–98%] in control patients versus 82% [71–96%] in intervention patients (p = 0.092). Goal trough anti-Xa was achieved on first assessment in 38.1% enox12 versus 50% enox8 patients (p = 0.67), 84.6% versus 53.3% on second assessment (p = 0.11), and 100% vs. 54.5% on third trough assessment (p = 0.045). AT-III activity did not differ between high-risk trauma patients with goal and subprophylactic enoxaparin anti-Xa concentrations, although future investigation is warranted. Enoxaparin dose adjustment rather than frequency adjustment may be associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving goal anti-Xa over time.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Byrne JP, Geerts W, Mason SA et al (2017) Effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin to prevent pulmonary embolism following major trauma: a propensity-matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 82:252–262
Jacobs BN, Cain-Neilson AH, Jakubus JL et al (2017) Unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83:151–158
Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI et al (1996) A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 335:701–707
Knudson MM, Morabito D, Paiement GD, Shakleford S (1996) Use of low molecular weight heparin in preventing thromboembolism in trauma patients. J Trauma 41:446–459
Velhamos GC, Nigro J, Tatevossiam R et al (1998) Inability of an aggressive policy of thromboprophylaxis to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically injured patients: are current methods of DVT prophylaxis insufficient? J Am Coll Surg 187:529–533
Cothren CC, Smith WR, Moore EE, Morgan SJ (2007) Utility of once-daily dose of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in multisystem trauma patients. World J Surg 31:98–104
Arnold JD, Dart BW, Barker DE et al (2010) Unfractionated heparin three times a day versus enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients. Am Surg. 76(6):563–70
Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in Orthopedic Surgery Patients Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 141(2):e278S-325S
Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141(2 (Suppl)):e227S – e277
Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos G, Rozycki G, Luchette FA (2002) Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: The EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma 53(1):142–164
Bush S, LeClaire A, Hampp C, Lottenberg L (2011) Once- versus twice-daily enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk trauma patients. J Intensive Care Med 26(2):111–115
Norwood SH, McAuley CE, Berne JD et al (2001) A potentially expanded role for enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in high risk blunt trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 192:161–167
Devlin JW, Tyburski JG, Moed B (2001) Implementation and evaluation of guidelines for use of enoxaparin as deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis after major trauma. Pharmacotherapy 21(6):740–747
Om SP, Oswanski MF, Joseph RJ et al (2007) Venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Am Surg 73:1173–1180
Knudson MM, Ikossi DG, Khaw L, Morabito D, Speetzen LS (2004) Thromboembolism after trauma: an analysis of 1602 episodes from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Ann Surg 240(3):490–498
Malinoski D, Jafari F, Ewing T et al (2010) Standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing leads to inadequate anti-Xa levels and increased deep venous thrombosis rates in critically ill trauma and surgical patients. J Trauma 68(4):874–880
Constantini TW, Min E, Box K et al (2013) Dose adjusting enoxaparin is necessary to achieve adequate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(1):128–133
Kopelman TR, O’Neill PJ, Pieri PG et al (2013) Alternative dosing of prophylactic enoxaparin in the trauma patient: is more the answer? Am Journal Surg 206:911–916
Nunez JM, Becher RD, Rebo GJ et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of weight-based prophylactic enoxaparin dosing in critically ill trauma patients: adequacy of antiXa levels is improved. Am Surg 81:605–609
Rostas JW, Brevard SB, Ahmed N et al (2015) Standard dosing of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is not sufficient for most patients within a trauma intensive care unit. Am Surg 81:889–892
Berndtson AE, Constantini TW, Lane J, Box K, Coimbra R (2016) If some is good, more is better: an enoxaparin dosing strategy to improve pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81:1095–1100
Ko A, Harada MY, Barmpara G et al (2016) Association between enoxaparin dosage adjusted by anti-factor Xa through level and clinically evident venous thromboembolism after trauma. JAMA Surg 151(11):1006–1013
Chapman SA, Irwin ED, Reicks P, Beilman GJ (2016) Non-weight-based enoxaparin dosing subtherapeutic in trauma patients. J Surg Res 201:181–187
Singer GA, Riggi G, Karcutskie CA et al (2016) Anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis reduces rate of deep venous thromboembolism in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81:1101–1108
Karcutskie CA, Dharmaraja A, Patel J et al (2017) Relation of antifactor-Xa peak levels and venous thromboembolism after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83:1102–1107
Karcutskie CA, Dharmaraja A, Patel J et al (2018) Association of anti-factor Xa-guided dosing of enoxaparin with venous thromboembolism after trauma. JAMA Surg 153(2):144–149
Kopelman TR, Walters JW, Bogert JN et al (2017) Goal directed enoxaparin dosing provides superior chemoprophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis. Injury 48:1088–1092
Dhillon NK, Smith EJT, Gillette E et al (2018) Trauma patients with lower extremity and pelvic fractures: should anti-factor Xa trough level guide prophylactic enoxaparin dose? Int J Surg 51:128–132
Kay AB, Majercik S, Sorensen J et al (2018) Weight-based enoxaparin dosing and deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized trauma patients: a double-blind, randomized, pilot study. Surgery 164(1):144–149
Imran JB, Madni TD, Clark AT et al (2018) Inability to predict subprophylactic anti-factor Xa levels in trauma patients receiving early low-molecular-weight heparin. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 85:867–872
Bethea A, Adams E, Lucente FC, Samanta D, Chumbe JT (2018) Improving pharmacologic prevention of VTE in trauma: IMPACT-IT QI project. Am Surg 84:1097–1104
Rutherford EJ, Schooler WG, Sredzienski E, Abrams JE, Skeete DA (2005) Optimal dose of enoxaparin in critically ill trauma and surgical patients. J Trauma 58:1167–1170
Droege ME, Mueller EW, Besl KM et al (2014) Effect of a dalteparin prophylaxis protocol using anti-factor Xa concentrations on venous thromboembolism in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:450–456
Haas CE, Nelsen JL, Raghavendran K et al (2005) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin in multiple trauma patients. J Trauma 59(6):1336–1343
Liener UC, Bruckner UB, Strecker W et al (2001) Trauma severity-dependent changes in AT-III activity. Shock 15(5):344–347
Miller RS, Weatherford DA, Stein D, Crane MM, Stein M (1994) Antithrombin III and trauma patients: factors that determine low levels. J Trauma 37(3):442–445
Owings JT, Bagley M, Gosselin R, Romac D, Disbrow E (1996) Effect of critical injury on plasma antithrombin activity: low antithrombin levels are associated with thromboembolic complications. J Trauma 41(3):396–405
Floccard B, Rugeri L, Faure A et al (2012) Early coagulopathy in trauma patients: an on-scene and hospital admission study. Injury 43:26–32
Scherer R, Spangenberg P (1998) Procoagulant activity in patients with isolated severe head trauma. Crit Care Med 26(1):149–156
Waydhas C, Nast-Kolb D, Gippner-Steppert C et al (1998) High-dose antithrombin III treatment of severely injured patients: results of a prospective study. J Trauma 45(5):931–940
Wilson RF, Mammen EF, Tyburski JG, Warsow KM, Kubinec SM (1996) Antithrombin levels related to infections and outcome. J Trauma 40(3):384–387
Connelly CR, Van PY, Hart KD et al (2016) Thromboelastograpy-based dosing of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in trauma and surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 151(10):1–8
Louis SG, Van PY, Riha GM et al (2014) Thromboelasogram-guided enoxaparin dosing dose not confer protection from deep venous thrombosis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(4):937–942
Robinson S, Zincuk A, Larsen UL et al (2013) A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 17:1–8
Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC, Rodriguez JL et al (1997) Posttrauma thromboembolism prophylaxis. J Trauma 42:100–103
Baker JE, Niziolek GM, Elson NC et al (2019) Optimizing lower extremity duplex ultrasound screening after traumatic injuries. J Surg Res 243:143–150
Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14(3):187–196
Ley EJ, Brown CV, Moore EE et al (2020) Updated guidelines to reduce venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: a Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 89(5):971