Impact of an additional right pulmonary vein on second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched score study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 54 - Trang 1-8 - 2018
Ken Takarada1, Erwin Ströker1, Juan-Pablo Abugattas1, Valentina de Regibus1, Hugo-Enrique Coutiño1, Ian Lusoc1, Lucio Capulzini1, Juan Sieira1, Giacomo Mugnai1, Francesca Salghetti1, Rajin Choudhury1, Saverio Iacopino2, Carlo de Asmundis1, Pedro Brugada1, Gian-Battista Chierchia1
1Heart Rhythm Management Center, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
2Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, Gruppo Villa Maria, Cotignola, Italy

Tóm tắt

Cryoballoon (CB) technology in the context of anatomical pulmonary vein (PV) variants might hypothetically hamper successful PV isolation (PVI). Our aim was to assess the impact of a right middle PV (RMPV) in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon (CB advance—CB-A), on procedural parameters and on mid-term follow-up. Consecutive patients with AF presenting RMPV (RMPV+) at the pre-procedural computed tomography who underwent PVI by CB-A were enrolled. Comparison with propensity score-matched patients without RMPV (RMPV−) was performed. Acute procedural parameters and clinical follow-up were assessed. A total of 240 patients (80 RMPV+) were included in the analysis. Twelve of 80 (15%) RMPV+ patients underwent a direct cryo-application in this variant and accomplished the isolation without phrenic nerve palsy, whereas in 25 of 80 (31%) RMPV+ patients, the RMPVs were not targeted directly nor indirectly (by co-occlusion during application at a major PV). At a median follow-up of 17.3 [interquartile range 11.3–26.5] months, there was no significant difference in AF-free survival between RMPV+ and RMPV− patients (78.8 vs 78.1%, P = 1.00), and the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias among patients with versus without an intentional or indirect cryo-application to the RMPV was not different (22 vs 20%, P = 1.00). Mid-term outcome after CB-A ablation did not differ between RMPV+ and RMPV− patients. Within RMPV+ patients, outcome was similar between those with versus without a cryo-application (either direct or indirect) to the additional vein.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, Gunawardene M, Schulte-Hahn B, Urban V, et al. Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:492–7. Martins RP, Hamon D, Césari O, Behaghel A, Behar N, Sellal JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of a second-generation cryoballoon in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:386–93. Straube F, Dorwarth U, Vogt J, Kuniss M, Heinz Kuck K, Tebbenjohanns J, et al. Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE cohort substudy. Europace. 2014;16:1434–42. Aytemir K, Gurses KM, Yalcin MU, Kocyigit D, Dural M, Evranos B, et al. Safety and efficacy outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation cryoballoon. Europace. 2015;17:379–87. Di Giovanni G, Wauters K, Chierchia GB, Sieira J, Levinstein M, Conte G, et al. One-year follow-up after single procedure cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the first and second generation balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:834–9. Brugada P, Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, Bouzeman A, Hireche H, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation—a prospective evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:225–31. Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, Latcu DG, Providencia R, Di Giovanni G, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace. 2015;17:718–24. Chen J, Yang ZG, Xu HY, Shi K, Long QH, Guo YK. Assessments of pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomical variants in atrial fibrillation patients for catheter ablation with cardiac CT. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:660–70. McLellan AJ, Ling LH, Ruggiero D, Wong MC, Walters TE, Nisbet A, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of pulmonary venous anatomy on long-term outcome of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:549–56. Ströker E, de Asmundis C, Saitoh Y, Velagić V, Mugnai G, Irfan G, et al. Anatomic predictors of phrenic nerve injury in the setting of pulmonary vein isolation using the 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:342–51. Irfan G, de Asmundis C, Mugnai G, Poelaert J, Verborgh C, Umbrain V, et al. One-year follow-up after second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in a large cohort of patients: a single-centre experience. Europace. 2016;18:987–93. Ciconte G, Sieira-Moret J, Hacioglu E, Mugnai G, DI Giovanni G, Velagic V, et al. Single 3-minute versus double 4-minute freeze strategy for second-generation cryoballoon ablation: a single-center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:796–803. Ghosh J, Singarayar S, Kabunga P, McGuire MA. Subclavian vein pacing and venous pressure waveform measurement for phrenic nerve monitoring during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:884–90. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962. Anselmino M, Blandino A, Beninati S, Rovera C, Boffano C, Belletti M, et al. Morphologic analysis of left atrial anatomy by magnetic resonance angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: a large single center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:1–7. Thorning C, Hamady M, Liaw JV, Juli C, Lim PB, Dhawan R, et al. CT evaluation of pulmonary venous anatomy variation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:1–9. Shigeta T, Okishige K, Yamauchi Y, Aoyagi H, Nakamura T, Yamashita M, et al. Clinical assessment of cryoballoon ablation in cases with atrial fibrillation and a left common pulmonary vein. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13267. Ströker E, Takarada K, de Asmundis C, Abugattas JP, Mugnai G, Velagić V, et al. Second-generation cryoballoon ablation in the setting of left common pulmonary veins: procedural findings and clinical outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1311–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.019. Heeger CH, Tscholl V, Wissner E, Fink T, Rottner L, Wohlmuth P, et al. Acute efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical outcomes using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with a left common pulmonary vein: a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1111–8. Marom EM, Herndon JE, Kim YH, McAdams HP. Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2004;230:824–9. Cabrera JA, Ho SY, Climent V, Sánchez-Quintana D. The architecture of the left lateral atrial wall: a particular anatomic region with implications for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:356–62. Knecht S, Kühne M, Altmann D, Ammann P, Schaer B, Osswald S, et al. Anatomical predictors for acute and mid-term success of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation using the 28 mm balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:132–8. Kim YH, Marom EM, Herndon JE 2nd, McAdams HP. Pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape: CT analysis. Radiology. 2005;235:43–9.