Impact of Partial Administration of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory on Concurrent Validity for People With Brain Injury

American Journal of Occupational Therapy - Tập 64 Số 2 - Trang 279-287 - 2010
Josée Duquette1, Patricia McKinley2, Barbara Mazer3, Isabelle Gélinas4, Marie T. Vanier5, Dana Benoit6, Jacques Gresset7
1Josée Duquette, MSc, is Research Agent, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain and Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal, Quebec
2Patricia McKinley, PhD, is Researcher, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Quebec; Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal, Quebec; and Associate Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
3Barbara Mazer, PhD, is Researcher, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Quebec; Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Quebec; and Assistant Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
4Isabelle Gélinas, PhD, is Researcher, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Quebec; Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Quebec; and Associate Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Promenade Sir Wm Osler, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y5 Canada; [email protected]
5Marie Vanier, PhD, is Researcher, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Quebec; Institut de Réadaptation de Montréal, Quebec; and Associate Professor, École de Réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Quebec
6Dana Benoit, MSc, is Occupational Therapist, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain and Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal, Quebec
7Jacques Gresset, PhD, is Researcher, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain, Montreal, Quebec; and Professor, École d’Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Tóm tắt

Abstract OBJECTIVES. We sought to determine whether the partial administration of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory (CBDI) has a significant effect on its concurrent validity. METHOD. Data were extracted from charts of clients with cerebrovascular accident or traumatic brain injury from three centers. The CBDI was administered either completely or partially (right and left perimetry or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised (WAIS–R; Wechsler, 1982; Picture Completion and Digit Symbol tests were not completed). Concurrent validity indicators were calculated for the CBDI and three different scenarios of partial administration of the CBDI. RESULTS. Only 52% of the road test failures were predicted correctly by the completely administered CBDI. Nonadministration of the WAIS–R rarely modified the CBDI results. Omission of perimetry scores tended to increase the sensitivity and decrease the specificity (not significantly). CONCLUSION. The CBDI should be used as a complement, not a substitution, for a road test. Partially administrating the CBDI, specifically excluding perimetry measures, can affect its concurrent validity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Antrim, 1989, The driving dilemma and the law: Patient’s striving for independence versus public safety, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 7, 16

Bouillon, 2006, Validity of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory in predicting driving outcome, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 420, 10.5014/ajot.60.4.420

Bracy, 1985, Cognitive rehabilitation: A process approach, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 4, 10

Dubinsky, 1991, Driving in Parkinson’s disease, Neurology, 41, 517, 10.1212/WNL.41.4.517

Engum, 1990, Restandardization of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 8, 20

Engum, 1990, Criterion-related validity of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory: Brain-injured patients versus normal control participants, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 2, 20

Engum, 1988, Norms and decision making rules for the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 6, 12

Engum, 1988, Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 6, 34

Engum, 1989, Criterion-related validity of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Index, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 7, 22

Feinstein, 1977, Clinical biostatistics, 10.1002/cpt1977224485

Golper, 1980, Aphasic adults and their decisions on driving: An evaluation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 34

Klavora, 2000, Driving skills in elderly persons with stroke: Comparison of two new assessment options, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 701, 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90096-0

Korner-Bitensky, 2006, Driving evaluation practices of clinicians working in the United States and Canada, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 428, 10.5014/ajot.60.4.428

Korner-Bitensky, 1990, Perceptual and cognitive impairments and driving, Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 36, 323

Lambert, 1990, The Cognitive Behavioral Driver’s Inventory: Item scatter and organic brain damage, Cognitive Rehabilitation, 8, 34

LeBlang, 1979, Epilepsy, motor vehicle licensure and the law: The physician’s rights and responsibilities in Illinois, Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 10, 203

Legh-Smith, 1986, Driving after a stroke, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 79, 200, 10.1177/014107688607900404

Michon, 1985, A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do?, Human behavior and traffic safety, 485, 10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19

Noreau, 1999, Productivity outcomes of individuals with spinal cord injury, Spinal Cord: The Official Journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia, 37, 730, 10.1038/sj.sc.3100918

Quigley, 1983, Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 474, 10.5014/ajot.37.7.474

Reitan, 1986, Trail Making Test manual for administration and scoring

Shore, 1980, Handicapped driving: Overview of assessment and training, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 481

Sivak, 1981, Driving and perceptual/cognitive skills: Behavioral consequences of brain damage, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 476

Sprigle, 1995, Assessment of the evaluation procedures of drivers with disabilities, OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 15, 147

Unsworth, 2005, Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 57, 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00456.x

van Zomeren, 1987, Acquired brain damage and driving: A review, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 697

Weaver, 1989, Driver Performance Test

Wechsler, 1982, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised manual

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Tập 64 Số 2

279-287

Thông tin tác giả