Tác động của Hệ thống Phát thuốc đến Giảm đau Thần kinh cục bộ trong Đẻ

Current Anesthesiology Reports - Tập 3 - Trang 275-281 - 2013
Srividhya Jayant Iyer1, Alex T. H. Sia1
1Department of Women’s Anaesthesia, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Tóm tắt

Giảm đau thần kinh cục bộ trong điều trị đau khi sinh đã chứng minh là hiệu quả và an toàn trong vài thập kỷ qua. Hiện nay, một số chiến lược mới đang được phát triển nhằm nâng cao sự giảm đau và sự hài lòng của sản phụ trong khi vẫn cung cấp cho họ sự tự chủ lớn hơn đối với chế độ giảm đau của bản thân. Những năm gần đây đã chứng kiến sự phát triển của các máy bơm tiêm mới, tương tác hơn, linh hoạt hơn và cho phép điều chỉnh giảm đau theo nhu cầu riêng của từng sản phụ khi cơn chuyển dạ tiến triển. Trong bài tổng quan này, chúng tôi sẽ xem xét một số chiến lược duy trì giảm đau thần kinh cục bộ trong quá trình sinh nở với trọng tâm là tác động của các hệ thống phát thuốc trong quá khứ, hiện tại và tương lai.

Từ khóa

#giảm đau thần kinh cục bộ #cơn đau khi sinh #hệ thống phát thuốc #sản phụ #bơm tiêm

Tài liệu tham khảo

Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (the John J. Bonica lecture). Pain. 1984;19(4):321–37. Mhyre JM. What’s new in obstetric anesthesia? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(2):149–59. Leo S, Sia AT. Maintaining labour epidural analgesia: what is the best option? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21(3):263–9. Srividhya Jayant Iyer SL. Maintenance of neuraxial block in labor analgesia. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2012;2(4):199–204. Loubert C, Hinova A, Fernando R. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(3):191–212. Sng BL, et al. Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a basal infusion for labour and delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(1):46–53. Kandel PF, Spoerel WE, Kinch RA. Continuous epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: review of 1000 cases. Can Med Assoc J. 1966;95(19):947–53. Bromage PR. Continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for obstetrics. Can Med Assoc J. 1961;85:1136–40. Moore DC. Anesthetic techniques for obstetrical anesthesia and analgesia. Boston: Springfield; 1964. Capogna G, Stirparo S. Techniques for the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(3):261–7. Davies AO, Fettes IW. A simple safe method for continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1981;28(5):484–7. Boutros A, et al. Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999;8(4):236–41. Beilin Y, et al. Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(3):756–63. COMETCSG UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9275):19–23. Van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(3):459–65. Halpern SH, Carvalho B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):921–8. Gambling DR, et al. A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35(3 (Pt 1)):249–54. Paech MJ. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour—is a continuous infusion of benefit? Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992;20(1):15–20. Chua NP, Sia AT, Ocampo CE. Parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour: bupivacaine vs. ropivacaine. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(12):1169–73. Ruban P, Sia AT, Chong JL. The effect of adding fentanyl to ropivacaine 0.125 % on patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28(5):517–21. Sia AT, et al. Motor blockade is reduced with ropivacaine 0.125 % for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(11):1019–23. Sia AT, Chong JL. Epidural 0.2 % ropivacaine for labour analgesia: parturient-controlled or continuous infusion? Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27(2):154–8. Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51(6):581–5. Fettes PD, et al. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(3):359–64. Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999;89(2):534. Hogan Q. Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27(2):150–6. Lim Y, et al. Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(5):894–9. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):673–8. Leo S, et al. A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19(4):357–64. Wong CA, et al. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(3):904–9. Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett B. The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(4):904–11. Capogna G, et al. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(4):826–31. ∙ George RB, TK Allen, AS Habib. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(1):133–44. First systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intermittent epidural bolus against continuous epidural infusions with or without PCEA. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(11):951–6. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo CE. Comparison of computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia vs. conventional patient controlled epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(4):339–44. ∙∙ Sia AT, S Leo, CE Ocampo. A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(3):267–75. This study compared a new and unique concept of variable frequency automated boluses with basal infusion using new pump technology.