Impact of DWI and ADC values in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI score
Tóm tắt
Introduce DWI and quantitative ADC evaluation in O-RADS MRI system and observe how diagnostic performance changes. Assess its validity and reproducibility between readers with different experience in female pelvic imaging. Finally, evaluate any correlation between ADC value and histotype in malignant lesions.
In total, 173 patients with 213 indeterminate adnexal masses (AMs) on ultrasound were subjected to MRI examination, from which 140 patients with 172 AMs were included in the final analysis. Standardised MRI sequences were used, including DWI and DCE sequences. Two readers, blinded to histopathological data, retrospectively classified AMs according to the O-RADS MRI scoring system. A quantitative analysis method was applied by placing a ROI on the ADC maps obtained from single-exponential DWI sequences. AMs considered benign (O-RADS MRI score 2) were excluded from the ADC analysis. Excellent inter-reader agreement was found in the classification of lesions according to the O-RADS MRI score (K = 0.936; 95% CI). Two ROC curves were created to determine the optimal cut-off value for the ADC variable between O-RADS MRI categories 3–4 and 4–5, respectively, 1.411 × 10–3 mm2/sec and 0.849 × 10–3 mm2/sec. Based on these ADC values, 3/45 and 22/62 AMs were upgraded, respectively, to score 4 and 5, while 4/62 AMs were downgraded to score 3. ADC values correlated significantly with the ovarian carcinoma histotype (p value < 0.001). Our study demonstrates the prognostic potential of DWI and ADC values in the O-RADS MRI classification for better radiological standardisation and characterisation of AMs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012: Globocan 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
Meys EMJ, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RFPM, Slangen BFM, Van Calster B, Aertgeerts B, Verbakel JY, Timmerman D, Van Gorp T (2016) Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 58:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.007
Sadowski EA, Paroder V, Patel-Lippmann K, Robbins JB, Barroilhet L, Maddox E, McMahon T, Sampene E, Wasnik AP, Blaty AD et al (2018) Indeterminate adnexal cysts at US: prevalence and characteristics of ovarian cancer. Radiology 287:1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172271
Froyman W, Landolfo C, De Cock B, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E et al (2019) Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): a 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective. Cohort Study Lancet Oncol 20:448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30837-4
Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, Millet I, Bharwani N, Juhan V, Cunha TM et al (2020) Ovarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1919896. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896
Reinhold C, Rockall A, Sadowski EA, Siegelman ES, Maturen KE, Vargas HA, Forstner R, Glanc P, Andreotti RF, Thomassin-Naggara I (2021) Ovarian-adnexal reporting lexicon for MRI: a white paper of the ACR ovarian-adnexal reporting and data systems MRI committee. J Am Coll Radiol 18:713–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.022
Petralia G, Summers PE, Agostini A, Ambrosini R, Cianci R, Cristel G, Calistri L, Colagrande S (2020) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in oncology: how we do it. Radiol Med 125(12):1288–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01220-z. (PMID: 32415476)
Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADSMRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD, PhD; Edouard Poncelet, MD; Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray, MD; Adalgisa Guerra, MD; Laure S. Fournier, MD, PhD
Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Bazot M (2013) Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology 267:432–443. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121161
Aydin H (2019) The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy. Br J Radiol 92:20180464. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180464
Li, X.; Zhu, H.; Fan, H.; Zhang, W.; Fang, Y. (2022) The dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging of breast cancer: the correlation between mono-exponential dwi parameters and semi-quantitative tic characteristics; In Review
Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha TM, Kinkel KESUR (2010) Guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 20:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1584-2
Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Cuenod CA, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21377
Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Cuenod CA, Fournier L, Toussaint I, Marsault C, Bazot M (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1299-4
Sohaib SAA, Sahdev A, Trappen PV, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 180:1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801297
Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Maturen KE, Forstner R, Jha P, Nougaret S, Siegelman ES, Reinhold C (2022) O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: guide for assessing adnexal lesions from the ACR O-RADS committee. Radiology 303:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.204371
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Useful Tool for Characterizing Ovarian Epithelial Tumors Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD,1–4* Emile Daraı¨, MD, PhD,2 Charles A Cuenod, MD, PhD,4,5 Roman Rouzier, MD, PhD,2 Patrice Callard, MD, PhD,3 and Marc Bazot, MD1)
Guadilla I, Calle D, López-Larrubia P (2018) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Methods Mol Biol 1718:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7531-0_6. (PMID: 29341004)
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, RH Young (2014) WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. WHO Classification of Tumours; 4 th.; World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer Publications
Silverberg SG (2000) Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol 19:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-200001000-00003
Rizzo S, Cozzi A, Dolciami M, Del Grande F, Scarano AL, Papadia A, Gui B, Gandolfo N, Catalano C, Manganaro L (2022) O-RADS MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance and category-wise malignancy rates. Radiology 22:220795. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220795. (PMID: 36413127)
Ruiz M, Labauge P, Louboutin A, Limot O, Fauconnier A, Huchon C (2016) External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 205:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.493
Sasaguri K, Yamaguchi K, Nakazono T, Mizuguchi M, Aishima S, Yokoyama M, Irie H (2019) External validation of ADNEX MR scoring system: a single-centre retrospective study. Clin Radiol 74:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.10.014
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology State University of Campinas-Unicamp, Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil; Section of Imaginology; Sumaré State Hospital, Sumaré, São Paulo, Brazil; Pereira, P.N.; Sarian, L.O.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology State University of Campinas-Unicamp, Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil; Yoshida, A.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology State University of Campinas-Unicamp, Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil; Araújo, K.G.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology State University of Campinas-Unicamp, Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil; et al. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR Scoring System Based on a Simplified MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Adnexal Masses. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. (2018)
Aslan S, Tosun SA (2021) Diagnostic accuracy and validity of the O-RADS MRI score based on a simplified mri protocol: a single tertiary center retrospective study. Acta Radiol 64(1):377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851211060413
Hottat NA, Badr DA, Van Pachterbeke C, Vanden Houte K, Denolin V, Jani JC, Cannie MM (2022) Added value of quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in OVARIAN ADNEXAL reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 56:158–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28003
Pereira PN, Yoshida A, Sarian LO, Barros RHDO, Jales RM, Derchain S (2022) Assessment of the performance of the O-RADS MRI score for the evaluation of adnexal masses with technical notes. Radiol Bras 55:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0050
Elshetry ASF, Hamed EM, Frere RAF, Zaid NA (2022) Impact of adding mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) measurements to O-RADS MRI scoring for adnexal lesions characterization: a combined O-RADS MRI/Adcmean approach. Acad Radiol 30(2):300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.07.019
Basha MAA, Abdelrahman HM, Metwally MI, Alayouty NA, Mohey N, Zaitoun MMA, Almassry HN, Yousef HY, El Sammak AA, Aly SA et al (2021) Validity and reproducibility of the ADNEX MR SCORING system in the diagnosis of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27285
Wengert GJ, Dabi Y, Kermarrec E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Poncelet E, Porcher R, ThomassinNaggara I, Rockall AG (2022) EURAD study group, O-RADS MRI classification of indeterminate adnexal lesions: time-intensity curve analysis is better than visual assessment. Radiology 303(3):566–575. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210342. (PMID: 35230183)
Chen L, Liu M, Bao J, Xia Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, Huang X, Wang J (2013) The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity in patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e79008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079008
Lindgren A, Anttila M, Rautiainen S, Arponen O, Kivelä A, Mäkinen P, Härmä K, Hämäläinen K, Kosma V-M, Ylä-Herttuala S et al (2017) Primary and metastatic ovarian cancer: characterization by 3.0T diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur Radiol 27:4002–4012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4786-z
Oh J-W, Rha SE, Oh SN, Park MY, Byun JY, Lee A (2015) Diffusion-weighted MRI of epithelial ovarian cancers: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values with histologic grade and surgical stage. Eur J Radiol 84:590–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.005
Sahin H, Panico C, Ursprung S, Simeon V, Chiodini P, Frary A, Carmo B, Smith J, Freeman S, Jimenez-Linan M et al (2021) Non-contrast MRI can accurately characterize adnexal masses: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol 31:6962–6973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07737-9