Impact of Contralateral Breast Shielding on the Risk of Developing Radiation-induced Cancer from Full-field Digital Mammography Screening

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences - Tập 50 - Trang 331-336 - 2019
Raed M.K. M.Ali1,2, Andrew England2, Claire E. Mercer2, Andrew K. Tootell2, Peter Hogg2,3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
2Radiography Directorate, University of Salford, Salford, UK
3Division of Radiography, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

Zenone, 2012, Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009, Br J Radiol, 85, e330, 10.1259/bjr/19099861 Olarinoye, 2010, A protocol for setting dose reference level for medical radiography in Nigeria: a review, Bayero J Pure Appl Sci, 3, 138 Hart, 2010 Linet, 2012, Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures, CA Cancer J Clin, 62, 75, 10.3322/caac.21132 Uffmann, 2009, Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose, Eur J Radiol, 72, 202, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.060 Bluekens, 2015, The potential use of ultra-low radiation dose images in digital mammography--a clinical proof-of-concept study in craniocaudal views, Br J Radiol, 88, 20140626, 10.1259/bjr.20140626 2015 Bosmans, 2013, Radiation doses and risks associated with mammographic screening, Curr Radiol Rep, 1, 30, 10.1007/s40134-013-0008-x Yaffe, 2011, Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening, Radiology, 258, 98, 10.1148/radiol.10100655 Iball, 2011, Organ and effective dose reduction in adult chest CT using abdominal lead shielding, Br J Radiol, 84, 1020, 10.1259/bjr/53865832 2007, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103, Ann ICRP, 37, 1 Sechopoulos, 2008, Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study, Radiology, 246, 434, 10.1148/radiol.2462070256 2012 Dance, 2009, Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Phys Med Biol, 54, 4361, 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002 Bouwman, 2013, Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment, Phys Med Biol, 58, 4423, 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4423 M.Ali, 2017, Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography, Eur J Radiol, 96, 98, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.003 Brenner, 2012, We can do better than effective dose for estimating or comparing low-dose radiation risks, Ann ICRP, 41, 124, 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.07.001 2006 2013 2005 1995, Basic anatomical and physiological data: the skeleton (publication 70), Ann ICRP, 25, 1, 10.1016/S0146-6453(00)80004-4