Impact and predictors of quality of life in adults diagnosed with a genetic muscle disorder: a nationwide population-based study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 31 - Trang 1657-1666 - 2021
Alice Theadom1, Miriam Rodrigues2, Annemarei Ranta3, Gemma Poke4, Donald Love5, Kelly Jones1, Braden Te Ao1,6, Graeme Hammond-Tooke7, Priya Parmar1,8, Gina O’Grady9, Richard Roxburgh2,10
1National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Auckland University of Technology, Northcote, New Zealand
2Neurology Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
3Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
4Genetic Health Service NZ, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
5Diagnostic Genetics, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
6Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
7Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
8Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
9Paediatric Neuroservices, Starship Children’s Health, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
10School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

To determine the impact of genetic muscle disorders and identify the sociodemographic, illness, and symptom factors influencing quality of life. Adults (aged 16–90 years) with a confirmed clinical or molecular diagnosis of a genetic muscle disorder identified as part of a nationwide prevalence study were invited to complete an assessment of the impact of their condition. Quality of life was measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire. Impact was measured via the prevalence of symptoms and comparisons of quality of life against New Zealand norms. Multivariate regression models were used to identify the most significant predictors of quality of life domains. 490/596 participants completed the assessment (82.2% consent rate). Quality of life was lower than the general population on physical (t = 9.37 p < 0.0001, d = 0.54) social (t = 2.27 p = 0.02, d = 0.13) and environmental domains (t = 2.28 p = 0.02, d = 0.13), although effect sizes were small. No difference was found on the psychological domain (t = − 1.17 p = 0.24, d = 0.07). Multivariate regression models (predicting 42%–64% of the variance) revealed personal factors (younger age, being in employment and in a relationship), symptoms (lower pain, fatigue, and sleep difficulties), physical health (no need for ventilation support, fewer activity limitations and no comorbidities), and psychosocial factors (lower depression, anxiety, behavioural dyscontrol and higher self-efficacy, satisfaction with health care and social support) contributed to improved quality of life. A range of factors influence the quality of life in adults diagnosed with a genetic muscle disorder and some may serve as targets for multi-faceted intervention.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cardamone, M., Darras, B. T., & Ryan, M. M. (2011). Inherited myopathies and muscular dystrophies. Seminars in Neurology, 28(2), 250–259. Graham, C. D., Rose, M. R., Grunfeld, E. A., Kyle, S. D., & Weinman, J. (2011). A systematic review of quality of life in adults with muscle disease. Journal of Neurology, 258(9), 1581–1592. Walklet, E., Muse, K., Meyrick, J., & Moss, T. (2016). Do Psychosocial Interventions Improve Quality of Life and Wellbeing in Adults with Neuromuscular Disorders? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Journal of Neuromuscular Disorders, 3(3), 347–362. Haas, B. K. (1999). A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 728–742. World Health Organisation Quality of Life [https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol] Jacques, M. F., Stockley, R. C., Onambele-Pearson, G. L., Reeves, N. D., Stebbings, G. K., Dawson, E. A., Groves, L., & Morse, C. I. (2019). Quality of life in adults with muscular dystrophy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1177-y Bos, I., Wynia, K., Almansa, J., Drost, G., Kremer, B., & Kuks, J. (2019). The prevalence and severity of disease-related disabilities and their impact on quality of life in neuromuscular diseases. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(14), 1676–1681. Theadom, A., Rodrigues, M., Poke, G., O’Grady, G., Love, D., Hammond-Tooke, G., Parmar, P., Baker, R., Feigin, V., Jones, K. . Te., Ao, B., Ranta, A., Roxburgh, R., On behalf of the MDPrev Research Group. (2019). A nationwide, population-based prevalence study of genetic muscle disorders. Neuroepidemiology, 52(3–4), 128–135. Norwood, F. L. M., Harling, C., Chinnery, P. F., Eagle, M., Bushby, K., & Straub, V. (2009). Prevalence of genetic muscle disease in Northern England: In-depth analysis of a muscle clinic population. Brain, 132(11), 3175–3186. Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health, 27(3), 281–291. Jones, K. M., O’Grady, G., Rodrigues, M. J., Ranta, A., Roxburgh, R. H., Love, D. R., Theadom, A., On behalf of the MDPrev Research Group. (2018). Impacts for children living with genetic muscle disorders and their parents—findings from a population-based study. Journal of Neuromuscular Disorders, 5(3), 341–352. WHOQOLGroup. (1998). Development of the world health organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558. World Health Organisation. (1996). WHOQOl-BREF Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. World Health Organisation. Krägeloh, C. U., Billington, R., Hsu, P. H., Feng, X. J., Medvedev, O. N., Kersten, P., Landon, J. J., & Siegert, R. (2016). Ordinal-to-interval scale conversion tables and national items for the New Zealand version of the WHOQOL-BREF. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166065 Vandervelde, L., Van den Bergh, P. Y., Goemans, N., & Thonnard, J. L. (2009). Activity limitations in patients with neuromuscular disorders: A responsiveness study of the ACTIVLIM questionnaire. Neuromuscular Disorders, 19(2), 99–103. [http://www.rehab-scales.org/activlim-rasch-analysis-neuromuscular-disorders.html] Krupp, L. B., LaRocca, N. G., Muir-Nash, J., & Steinberg, A. D. (1989). The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives of Neurology, 46(10), 1121–1123. Measuring Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders, Final Report of the NeuroQOL Study [http://www.neuroqol.org/Resources/Resources%20documents/NeuroQOL-Final%20report-2013.pdf] Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C. J., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavazos, J. E., Reder, A. T., Sufit, A. T., Simuni, T., Holmes, G. L., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., … Moy, C. (2012). Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78(23), 1860–1867. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004 Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193–213. Hopkins, W.G. (2002). A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. In: A New View of Statistics. www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html Merluzzi, T. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., Philip, E. J., Sohl, S. J., Berendsen, M., & Salsmanc, J. M. (2019). Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psycho-Oncology, 28(9), 1781–1790. Dong, D., Chong, M. K., & Wu, Y. (2020). Gender differences in quality of life among patients with myasthenia gravis in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01549-z Orsini, M., Carolina, A., Ferreira, A. F., de Assis, A., Magalhães, T., Teixeira, S., Bastos, V. H., Marinho, V., Oliveira, T., Fiorelli, R., Oliverira, A. B., & de Freitas, M. R. G. (2018). Cognitive impairment in neuromuscular diseases: A systematic review. Neurology international, 10(2), 7473. Burns, T. M., Graham, C. D., Rose, M. R., & Simmons, Z. (2012). Quality of life and measures of quality of life in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Muscle and Nerve, 46, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23245 Bann, C. M., Abresch, R. T., Biesecker, B., Conway, K. C., Heatwole, C., Peay, H., Scal, P., Strober, J., Uzark, K., Wolff, J., Margolis, M., Blackwell, A., Street, N., Montesanti, A., & Bolen, J. (2015). Measuring quality of life in muscular dystrophy. Neurology, 84(10), 1034–1042. Powell, P. A., Carlton, J., Buckley-Woods, H., & Mazzone, P. (2020). Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z