Imaging the hydraulic properties of a contaminated alluvial aquifer perturbed with periodic signals
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bakhos T, Cardiff M, Barrash W, Kitanidis PK (2014) Data processing for oscillatory pumping tests. J Hydrol 511:310–319
Batu V (1998) Aquifer hydraulics. Wiley, Chichester
Berg SJ, W.A. Illman. 2013. Field study of subsurface heterogeneity with steady-state hydraulic tomography. Groundwater 51:29–40
Berg SJ, Illman WA (2015) Comparison of hydraulic tomography with traditional methods at a highly heterogeneous site. Groundwater 53:71–89
Bohling GC, Butler JJ Jr, Zhan X, Knoll MD (2007) A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities. Water Resour Res 43:W05430
Butler JJ (2005) Hydrogeological methods for estimation of spatial variations in hydraulic conductivity. In: Rubin Y, Hubbard SS (eds) Hydrogeophysics. Water Science and Technology Library, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Cardiff M, Barrash W, Kitanidis PK, Malama B, Revil A, Straface S, Rizzo E (2009) A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography. Ground Water 47:259–270
Cardiff M, Barrash W (2015) Analytical and semi-analytical tools for the design of oscillatory pumping tests. Groundwater 53:896–907
Cardiff M, Slayer C (2016) Strategies for avoiding errors and ambiguities in the analysis of oscillatory pumping tests. J Hydrol 540:1016–1021
Cardiff M, Bakhos T, Kitanidis PK, Barrash W (2013) Aquifer heterogeneity characterization with oscillatory pumping: sensitivity analysis and imaging potential. Water Resour Res 49:5395–5410
Cardiff M, Zhou Y, Barrash W, Kitanidis PK (2019) Aquifer imaging with oscillatory hydraulic tomography: application at the field scale. Groundwater. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12960
De Clercq T, Jardani A, Fischer P, Thanberger L, Vu TM, Pitaval D, Côme J-M, Begassat P (2020) The use of electrical resistivity tomograms as a parameterization for the hydraulic characterization of a contaminated aquifer. J Hydrol 587:124986
D’Oria M, Zanini A, Cupola F (2018) Oscillatory pumping test to estimate aquifer hydraulic parameters in a Bayesian geostatistical framework. Math Geosci 50:169–186
Fischer P, Jardani A, Soueid Ahmed A, Abbas M, Wang X, Jourde H, Lecoq N (2017) Application of large-scale inversions algorithms to hydraulic tomography in an alluvial aquifer. Groundwater 55:208–218
Fischer P, Jardani A, Jourde H, Cardiff M, Wang X, Chedeville S, Lecoq N (2018) Harmonic pumping tomography applied to image the hydraulic properties and interpret the connectivity of a karstic and fractured aquifer (Lez aquifer, France). Adv Water Resour 119:227–244
Guiltinan E, Becker MW (2015) Measuring well hydraulic connectivity in fractured bedrock using periodic slug tests. J Hydrol 521:100–107
Hochstetler DL, Barrash W, Leven C, Cardiff M, Chidichimo F, Kitanidis PK (2016) Hydraulic tomography: continuity and discontinuity of high-K and low-K zones. Groundwater 54:171–185
Illman WA, Liu X, Takeuchi S, Yeh T-CJ, Ando K, Saegusa H (2009) Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami underground research site, Japan. Water Resour Res 45:W01406
Illman WA, Zhu J, Craig AJ, Yin D (2010) Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: a controlled laboratory sandbox study. Water Resour Res 46:W04502
Jardani A, Dupont JP, Revil A, Massei N, Fournier M, Laignel B (2012) Geostatistical inverse modeling of the transmissivity field of a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer under tidal influence. J Hydrol 472–473:287–300
Lavenue M, de Marsily G (2001) Three-dimensional interference test interpretation in a fractured aquifer using the pilot point inverse method. Water Resour Res 37:2659–2675
Le Borgne T, Bour O, de Dreuzy JR, Davy P, Touchard F (2004) Equivalent mean flow models for fractured aquifers: insights from a pumping tests scaling interpretation. Water Resour Res 40:W03512
Li W, Englert A, Cirpka OA, Vereecken H (2008) Three-dimensional Geostatistical inversion of flowmeter and pumping test data. Ground Water 46:193–201
Neuman SP, Witherspoon PA (1972) Field determination of the hydraulic properties of leaky multiple aquifer system. Water Resour Res 8:1284–1298
Rabinovich A, Barrash W, Cardiff M, Hochstetler DL, Bakhos T, Dagan G, Kitanidis PK (2015) Frequency dependent hydraulic properties estimated from oscillatory pumping tests in an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 531:2–16
Rasmussen TC, Haborak KG, Young MH (2003) Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties using sinusoidal pumping tests in an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 531:2–16
Sanchez-Vila X, Meier PM, Carrera J (1999) Pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers: an analytical study of what can be obtained from their interpretation using Jacob’s method. Water Resour Res 35:943–952
Sun AY, Lu J, Hovorka S (2015) A harmonic pulse testing method for leakage detection in deep subsurface storage formations. Water Resour Res 51:4263–4281
Wagner BJ (1992) Simultaneous parameter estimation and contaminant source characterization for coupled groundwater flow and contaminant transport modelling. J Hydrol 135:275–303
Wen J-C, Wu C-M, Yeh T-CJ, Tseng C-M (2010) Estimation of effective aquifer hydraulic properties from an aquifer test with multi-well observations (Taiwan). Hydrogeol J 18:1143–1155
Yeh T-CJ, Lee C-H (2007) Time to change the way we collect and analyze data for aquifer characterization. Ground Water 45:116–118
Yeh T-CJ, Liu S (2000) Hydraulic tomography: development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resour Res 36:2095–2105
Zhou Y, Cardiff M (2017) Oscillatory hydraulic testing as a strategy for NAPL source zone monitoring: laboratory experiments. J Contam Hydrol 200:24–34
Zhou Y, Lim D, Cupola F, Cardiff M (2016) Aquifer imaging with pressure waves: evaluation of low-impact characterization through sandbox experiments. Water Resour Res 52:2141–2156