Il tempo di risposta del Laboratorio (turnaround time, TAT) per la troponina (cTn). Raccomandazione del GdS MM SIPMeL

Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E et al. (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:959–969 Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (2007) Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2173–2195 Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al. (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1581–1598 Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG et al. (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:e139–e228 Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP et al. (2016) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:267–315 Zuin G, Parato VM, Groff P et al. (2016) Documento di consenso ANMCO/SIMEU: gestione intraospedaliera dei pazienti che si presentano con dolore toracico. G Ital Cardiol 17:416–446 Wu AHB, Apple FS, Gibler WB et al. (1999) National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases. Clin Chem 45:1104–1121 Breil B, Fritz F, Thiemann V et al. (2011) Mapping Turnaround Time (TAT) to a general timeline: a systematic review of TAT definition in clinical domains. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 11:34–46 Novis DA, Jones BA, Dale JC (2004) Biochemical markers of myocardial injury test turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 7020 troponin and 4368 creatin kinase-MB determinations in 159 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 128:158–164 Hawkins RC (2007) Laboratory turnaround time. Clin Biochem Rev 28:179–194 Bingisser R, Cairns C, Christ M et al. (2012) Cardiac troponin: a critical review of the case for point-of-care testing in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 30:1639–1649 Apple FS, Jesse RJ, Newby LK et al. (2007) National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem 53:547–551 Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al. (2000) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 36:970–1062 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2014) Myocardial infarction (acute): early rule out using high-sensitivity troponin tests (Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive, ARCHITECT STAT High Sensitive Troponin-I and AccuTnI+3 assays). Diagnostics guidance n. 15. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg15 (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2016) Acute coronary syndrome SIGN n. 148. http://www.sign.ac.uk (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L et al. (2016) National Heart Foundation of Australia & Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes 2016. Heart Lung Circ 25:895–951 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2016) Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis. Clinical guidance 95 (2010), updated 2016. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg15 (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Damman P, van’t Hof AW ten Berg JM et al. (2017) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: comments from the Dutch ACS working group. Neth Heart J 25:181–185 Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S et al. (2011) ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 32:2999–3054 McKeeman GC, Auld PW (2015) A national survey of troponin testing and recommendations for improved practice. Ann Clin Biochem 52:527–542 Cappelletti P, Morandini M, Moretti M et al. (2016) Raccomandazioni del Gruppo di Studio sui marcatori miocardici (GdS MM) di SIPMeL per l’implementazione di Point-of-care testing (POCT) per la determinazione della troponina (cTn). Riv Ital Med Lab 12:36–48 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) (2016) Point-of-Care Troponin Testing in Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Recommendations. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/OP0519_POC_Troponin_Recs.pdf (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists Inc. (AABC) (2016) Recommendations for Use of Point-of-Care (POC) Troponin Assays in Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome. https://www.aacb.asn.au/resources/recommendations-for-use-of-troponin-poc (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Wu AHB, Christenson RH, Green DN et al. (2018) Clinical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin in acute coronary syndrome: expert opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem 64:645–655 Blick KE (2013) Providing critical laboratory results on time, every time to help reduce emergency department length of stay: how our laboratory achieved a Six Sigma level of performance. Am J Clin Pathol 140:193–202 Koehler J, Flarity K, Hertner G et al. (2013) Effect of troponin I Point-of-Care testing on emergency department throughput measures and staff satisfaction. Adv Emerg Nurs J 35:270–277 Owen JJ, Worster A, Waines BM et al. (2014) Root cause analysis of delays to discharge for patients held for serial cardiac troponin levels. CJEM 16:20–24 Layfield C, Rose J, Alford A et al. (2015) Effectiveness of practices for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review. Clin Biochem 48:204–212 Li L, Georgiou A, Vecellio E et al. (2015) The effect of laboratory testing on emergency department length of stay: a multihospital longitudinal study applying a cross-classified random-effect modeling approach. Acad Emerg Med 22:38–46 Boelstler AM, Rowland R, Theoret J et al. (2015) Decreasing troponin turnaround time in the emergency department using the central laboratory: a process improvement study. Clin Biochem 48:308–312 Sander JH, Karr T (2015) Improving ED specimen TAT using Lean Six Sigma. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 28:428–440 White BS, Baron JM, Dighe AS et al. (2015) Applying Lean methodologies reduces ED laboratory turnaround times. Am J Emerg Med 33:1572–1576 Angeletti S, De Cesaris M, Hart JG et al. (2015) Laboratory automation and intra-laboratory turnaround time: experience at the University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico of Rome. J Lab Autom 20:652–658 Westwood M, van Asselt T, Ramaekers B et al (2015) High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 19(44) https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta19440/#/abstract (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Ialongo C, Porzio O, Giambini I et al. (2016) Total automation for the core laboratory: improving the turnaround time helps to reduce the volume of ordered STAT tests. J Lab Autom 21:451–458 Ison T, Morris L, Wilkerson G et al. (2016) Process improvements to reduce cardiac troponin turnaround time in the emergency department. Crit Pathw Cardiol 15:95–97 Verma A, Wang AS, Feldman MJ et al. (2017) Push-alert notification of troponin results to physician smartphones reduces the time to discharge emergency department patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 70:348–356 Morandini M, Sica E (2018) La tempestività come qualità e strategia. L’esperienza di Pordenone. Riv Ital Med Lab 14:32–40 Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE et al. (2013) Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol 168:795–802 Bahrmann P, Christ M, Bahrmann A et al. (2013) A 3-hour diagnostic algorithm for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in unselected older patients presenting to the emergency department. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:409–416 Storrow AB, Christenson RH, Nowak RM et al. (2015) Diagnostic performance of cardiac Troponin I for early rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Clin Biochem 48:254–259 Westwood M, van Asselt T, Ramaekers B et al. (2015) High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 19:1–234 Pickering JW, Greenslade JH, Cullen L et al. (2016) Validation of presentation and 3 h high-sensitivity troponin to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction. Heart 102:1270–1278 Wildi K, Nelles B, Twerenbold R et al. (2016) Safety and efficacy of the 0 h/3 h protocol for rapid rule out of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 181:16–25 Chapman AR, Anand A, Boeddinghaus J et al. (2017) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 135:1586–1596 Cullen L, Mueller C, Parsonage WA et al. (2013) Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1242–1249 Parsonage WA, Greenslade JH, Hammett CJ et al. (2014) Validation of an accelerated high-sensitivity troponin T assay protocol in an Australian cohort with chest pain. Med J Aust 200:161–165 Druey S, Wildi K, Twerenbold R et al. (2015) Early rule-out and rule-in of myocardial infarction using sensitive cardiac Troponin I. Int J Cardiol 195:163–170 Reichlin T, Cullen L, Parsonage WA et al. (2015) Two-hour algorithm for triage toward rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Am J Med 128:369–379.e4 Parsonage WA, Mueller C, Greenslade JH et al. (2016) Validation of NICE diagnostic guidance for rule out of myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin tests. Heart 102:1279–1286 Boeddinghaus J, Reichlin T, Cullen L et al. (2016) Two-hour algorithm for triage toward rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction by use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Clin Chem 62:494–504 McRae AD, Innes G, Graham M et al. (2017) Comparative evaluation of 2-hour rapid diagnostic algorithms for acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin t. Can J Cardiol 33:1006–1012 Wildi K, Cullen L, Twerenbold R et al. (2017) Direct comparison of 2 rule-out strategies for acute myocardial infarction: 2-h accelerated diagnostic protocol vs 2-h algorithm. Clin Chem 63:1227–1236 Lindahl B, Jernberg T, Badertscher P et al. (2017) An algorithm for rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using a novel troponin I assay. Heart 103:125–131 Than M, Cullen L, Reid CM et al. (2011) A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacifi c region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377:1077–1084 Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K et al. (2015) Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. CMAJ 187:E243–E252 Rubini Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Jaeger C et al. (2015) One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med 128:861–870.e4 Jaeger C, Wildi K, Twerenbold R et al. (2016) One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J 171:92–102.e1–5 Nestelberger T, Wildi K, Boeddinghaus J et al. (2016) Characterization of the observe zone of the ESC 2015 high-sensitivity cardiac troponin 0 h/1 h-algorithm for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 207:238–245 Mokhtari A, Borna C, Gilje P et al. (2016) A 1-h combination algorithm allows fast rule-out and rule-in of major adverse cardiac events. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:1531–1540 Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Schwemer T et al. (2016) Diagnosis of myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity troponin I 1-hour algorithm. JAMA Cardiol 1:397–404 Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M et al. (2016) Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Ann Emerg Med 68:76–87.e4 Pickering JW, Greenslade JH, Cullen L et al. (2016) Assessment of the European society of cardiology 0-hour/1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 134:1532–1541 Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Ojeda F et al. (2017) Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin I. PLoS ONE 12:e0174288 Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, Twerenbold R et al. (2017) Direct comparison of 4 very early rule-out strategies for acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Circulation 135:1597–1611 Ambavane A, Lindahl B, Giannitsis E et al. (2017) Economic evaluation of the one-hour rule-out and rule-in algorithm for acute myocardial infarction using the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay in the emergency department. PLoS ONE 12:e0187662 Shiozaki M, Inoue K, Suwa S et al. (2017) Utility of the 0-hour/1-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm in Asian patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 249:32–35 Röttger E, de Vries-Spithoven S, Reitsma JB et al. (2017) Safety of a 1-hour rule-out high-sensitive troponin T protocol in patients with chest pain at the Emergency Department. Crit Pathw Cardiol 16:129–134 Twerenbold R, Badertscher P, Boeddinghaus J et al. (2018) 0/1-hour triage algorithm for myocardial infarction in patients with renal dysfunction. Circulation 137:436–451 Pettersson A, Ljung L, Johansson C et al. (2018) Experiences of a one-hour algorithm in chest pain patients with a nonelevated troponin T at presentation. Crit Pathw Cardiol 17:6–12 Yokoyama H, Higuma T, Endo T et al. (2018) “30-minute-delta” of high-sensitivity troponin I improves diagnostic performance in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol 71:144–148 Rubini Giménez M, Hoeller R, Reichlin T et al. (2013) Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Int J Cardiol 168:3896–3901 Bandstein N, Ljung R, Johansson M et al. (2014) Undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level in the Emergency Department and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2569–2578 Zhelev Z, Hyde C, Youngman E et al. (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of single baseline measurement of elecsys troponin T high-sensitive assay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, Br Med J 350:h15 Body R, Burrows G, Carley S et al. (2015) Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a sensitive troponin I assay. Ann Clin Biochem 52:543–549 Kelly AM, Klim S (2015) Does undetectable troponin I at presentation using a contemporary sensitive assay rule out myocardial infarction? A cohort study. Emerg Med J 32:760–763 Carlton EW, Khattab A, Greaves K (2015) Identifying patients suitable for discharge after a single-presentation high-sensitivity troponin result: a comparison of five established risk scores and two high-sensitivity assays. Ann Emerg Med 66:635–645.e1 Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Meune C, Lefevre G et al. (2016) A single value of high-sensitive troponin T below the limit of detection is not enough for ruling out non ST elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Clin Biochem 49:1113–1117 Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Ojeda F et al. (2016) Immediate rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiogram and baseline high-sensitivity troponin I. Clin Chem 63:394–402 Shortt C, Xie F, Whitlock R et al. (2017) Economic considerations of early rule-in/rule-out algorithms for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the emergency department using cardiac troponin and glycemic biomarkers. Clin Chem 63:593–602 McRae AD, Innes G, Graham M et al. (2017) Undetectable concentrations of a food and drug administration-approved high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay to rule out acute myocardial infarction at emergency department arrival. Acad Emerg Med 24:1267–1277 Pickering JW, Than MP, Cullen L et al. (2017) Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction with a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement below the limit of detection: a collaborative meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 166:715–724 Marjot J, Kaier TE, Henderson K et al. (2017) A single centre prospective cohort study addressing the effect of a rule-in/rule-out troponin algorithm on routine clinical practice. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617746850 Peacock WF, Baumann BM, Bruton D et al. (2018) Efficacy of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Identifying Very-Low-Risk Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome. JAMA Cardiol 3:104–111 Brichko L, Schneider HG, Chan W et al. (2018) Rapid and safe discharge from the emergency department: a single troponin to exclude acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Australas. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12919 Greenslade J, Cho E, Van Hise C et al. (2018) Evaluating rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction by use of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay at presentation. Clin Chem. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.283887 Mueller-Hennessen M, Mueller C, Giannitsis E et al. (2017) Serial sampling of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T may not be required for prediction of acute myocardial infarction diagnosis in chest pain patients with highly abnormal concentrations at presentation. Clin Chem 63:542–551 Apple FS, Collinson PO IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (2012) Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem 58:54–61 Wu AHB, Christenson R (2017) The era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin has begun in the US (Finally). J Appl Lab Med 2:1–3. http://jalm.aaccjnls.org/content/2/1/1 (Accesso 25 maggio 2018) Storrow AB, Apple FS, Wu AHB et al. (2006) Use of cardiac biomarkers for acute coronary syndromes. In: Nichols JH (ed) Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: evidence based practice for point-of-care testing. AACC Press, Washington, pp 13–20. https://www.aacc.org/~/media/practice-guidelines/point-of-care-testing/poct-entire-lmpg.pdf?la=en (Accesso 5 marzo 2018) Bernstein SC, Aronsky D, Dursej R et al. (2009) The effect of Emergency Department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 16:1–10 Pines JM, Pollack CV, Dierks DB et al. (2009) The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 16:617–625 Ryś P, Władysiuk M, Skrzekowska-Baran I et al. (2009) Review articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses: which can be trusted? Pol Arch Med Wewn 119:148–156