Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships - Tập 39 Số 5 - Trang 1191-1212 - 2022
Laura M. Vowels1, Matthew J. Vowels2, Kristen P. Mark2
1Department of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
2Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Tóm tắt

Sexual satisfaction has been robustly associated with relationship and individual well-being. Previous studies have found several individual (e.g., gender, self-esteem, and attachment) and relational (e.g., relationship satisfaction, relationship length, and sexual desire) factors that predict sexual satisfaction. The aim of the present study was to identify which variables are the strongest, and the least strong, predictors of sexual satisfaction using modern machine learning. Previous research has relied primarily on traditional statistical models which are limited in their ability to estimate a large number of predictors, non-linear associations, and complex interactions. Through a machine learning algorithm, random forest (a potentially more flexible extension of decision trees), we predicted sexual satisfaction across two samples (total N = 1846; includes 754 individuals forming 377 couples). We also used a game theoretic interpretation technique, Shapley values, which allowed us to estimate the size and direction of the effect of each predictor variable on the model outcome. Findings showed that sexual satisfaction is highly predictable (48–62% of variance explained) with relationship variables (relationship satisfaction, importance of sex in relationship, romantic love, and dyadic desire) explaining the most variance in sexual satisfaction. The study highlighted important factors to focus on in future research and interventions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/0003122412445802

10.1080/713846827

Berlo W. V, 2017, Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 235

10.1177/1073191111408231

10.1214/ss/1009213726

10.1023/A:1010933404324

10.1080/00224490509552264

10.1080/00926230500232917

10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01406.x

10.1080/00224498809551400

10.1371/journal.pone.0213569

10.1023/A:1024591318836

10.1177/0265407502193004

10.2105/AJPH.2011.300154

10.1177/0265407518787349

10.1073/pnas.1917036117

10.1177/0956797617714580

10.1177/1948550620926770

Kumar I. E., Venkatasubramanian S., Scheidegger C., Friedler S. A. (2020). Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11097.

10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3

Lawrance K., 1992, The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1, 123

10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x

10.1080/0092623X.2019.1572680

Lundberg S. M., Allen P. G., Lee S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, CA, 4–9 December, 2017. https://github.com/slundberg/shap.

10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9

Lundberg S. M., 2019, Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles

10.1080/14681994.2012.678825

10.3138/cjhs.23.1.A2

10.1080/0092623X.2017.1405310

10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9

10.1177/0959353513508392

10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6

10.1080/00224499.2017.1373267

10.1080/00224499.2013.815149

Pedregosa F., 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

10.1080/00224499.2012.757281

Probst P., 2019, Discovery, 9, e1301

10.1037/h0029841

10.1177/1948550611416520

10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9

10.1007/s10508-015-0587-0

Shapley L. S., 1952, A value for n-person games

10.1080/00926239608414655

10.1080/00224490209552141

10.1093/bioinformatics/btr300

Toorzani ZM, 2010, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 15, 115

10.1007/978-1-4419-9782-1

10.1155/2014/502678

Vowels M. J., 2020, Psychological Methods

10.1080/0092623X.2019.1711274

10.1080/14681994.2018.1441991

10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.04.010

10.1080/00223890701268041

10.1177/1745691617693393

10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.339

Yousefi N., 2014, Scientific Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality, 2, 107

10.1007/s10508-013-0082-4