Identifying potential inhibitors of biofilm-antagonistic proteins to promote biofilm formation: a virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations approach

Samantaray PK, Madras G, Bose S (2019) Microbial biofilm membranes for water remediation and photobiocatalysis. In: Rathinam NK and Sani RK (eds). Next generation biomanufacturing technologies. ACS. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1329.ch014 Qureshi N, Annous BA, Ezeji TC et al (2005) Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion process: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microb Cell Fact 4:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-4-24 Germec M, Demirci A, Turhan I (2020) Biofilm reactors for value-added products production: an in-depth review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 27:101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101662 Ramírez-Vargas C, Prado A, Arias C et al (2018) Microbial electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment: Principles and evolution from microbial fuel cells to bioelectrochemical-based constructed wetlands. Water 10:1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091128 Skariyachan S, Sridhar VS, Packirisamy S et al (2018) Recent perspectives on the molecular basis of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and approaches for treatment and biofilm dispersal. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 63:413–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-018-0585-4 Sangshetti JN, Khan FAK, Patil RH et al (2015) Biofilm inhibition of linezolid-like Schiff bases: synthesis, biological activity, molecular docking and in silico ADME prediction. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 25:874–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.12.063 Lasa I, Penadés JR (2006) Bap: A family of surface proteins involved in biofilm formation. Res Microbiol 157:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.003 Latasa C, Solano C, Penadés JR, Lasa I (2006) Biofilm-associated proteins. CR Biol 329:849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2006.07.008 Reguera G (2018) Microbial nanowires and electroactive biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94:86. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy086 Hu Y, Mukherjee M, Cao B (2019) Biofilm-biology-informed biofilm engineering for environmental biotechnology. In: Rathinam NK and Sani RK (eds) Introduction to biofilm engineering, ACS. 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1323.ch003 Jones CJ, Newsom D, Kelly B et al (2014) ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq reveal an AmrZ-mediated mechanism for cyclic di-GMP synthesis and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003984 Bhagirath AY, Pydi SP, Li Y et al (2017) Characterization of the direct interaction between hybrid sensor kinases PA1611 and RetS that controls biofilm formation and the Type III secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Infect Dis 3:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00153 Zhou L, Li T, An J et al (2017) Subminimal inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) of antibiotic induces electroactive biofilm formation in bioelectrochemical systems. Water Res 125:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.059 Monzon O, Yang Y, Li Q, Alvarez PJJ (2016) Quorum sensing autoinducers enhance biofilm formation and power production in a hypersaline microbial fuel cell. Biochem Eng J 109:222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.01.023 Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN et al (2002) The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 58:899–907. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444902003451 Sullivan DM, Bobay BG, Kojetin DJ et al (2008) Insights into the nature of DNA binding of AbrB-like transcription factors. Structure 16:1702–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.08.014 Colledge VL, Fogg MJ, Levdikov VM et al (2011) Structure and organisation of SinR, the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 411:597–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.004 Pryor EE Jr, Waligora EA, Xu B et al (2012) The transcription factor AmrZ utilizes multiple DNA binding modes to recognize activator and repressor sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002648 Bellini D, Horrell S, Hutchin A et al (2017) Dimerisation induced formation of the active site and the identification of three metal sites in EAL-phosphodiesterases. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42166 Baker P, Whitfield GB, Hill PJ et al (2015) Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa glycoside hydrolase PslG reveals that its levels are critical for Psl polysaccharide biosynthesis and biofilm formation. J Biol Chem 290:28374–28387. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.674929 Mancl JM, Ray WK, Helm RF, Schubot FD (2019) Helix cracking regulates the critical interaction between RetS and GacS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Structure 27:785-793.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2019.02.006 Xu K, Li S, Yang W et al (2015) Structural and biochemical analysis of Tyrosine Phosphatase Related to Biofilm Formation A (TpbA) from the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. PLoS ONE 10:e0124330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124330 Pu M, Sheng L, Song S et al (2018) Serine hydroxymethyltransferase ShrA (PA2444) controls rugose small-colony variant formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 9:315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00315 Bienert S, Waterhouse A, De Beer TAP et al (2017) The SWISS-MODEL repository-new features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D313–D319. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1132 Logan BE, Rossi R, Ragab A, Saikaly PE (2019) Electroactive microorganisms in bioelectrochemical systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:307–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0173-x Yu S, Su T, Wu H et al (2015) PslG, a self-produced glycosyl hydrolase, triggers biofilm disassembly by disrupting exopolysaccharide matrix. Cell Res 25:1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.129 Kim S, Thiessen PA, Bolton EE et al (2016) PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D1202–D1213. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv951 Zoete V, Daina A, Bovigny C, Michielin O (2016) SwissSimilarity: a web tool for low to ultra high throughput ligand-based virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 56:1399–1404. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00174 Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC et al (2018) DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the drugbank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D1074–D1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037 Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) ZINC - A free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci049714+ Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3381–3385. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg520 Baba N, Akaho E (2011) VSDK: Virtual screening of small molecules using autodock vina on windows platform. Bioinformation 6:387–388. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630006387 Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) Autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334 Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC et al (2012) Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminform 4:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA et al (2011) Open babel: an open chemical tool box. J Cheminform 3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 Boittier ED, Tang YY, Buckley ME et al (2020) (2020) Assessing molecular docking tools to guide targeted drug discovery of CD38 inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci 21(21):5183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155183 Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O (2011) SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res 39:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr366 Allen WJ, Balius TE, Mukherjee S et al (2015) DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance. J Comput Chem 36:1132–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23905 Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O (2007) EADock: Docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 67:1010–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21367 Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC et al (2004) UCSF Chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084 Abelyan N, Grabski H, Tiratsuyan S (2020) In silico Screening of flavones and its derivatives as potential inhibitors of Quorum-Sensing regulator LasR of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Biol 54:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893320010021 Yang J, Chen Y, Shen T et al (2005) Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:1134–1146. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci050034w Lindahl, Abraham, Hess, Spoel van der (2020) GROMACS 2020.3 Manual. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3923644. Sousa Da Silva AW, Vranken WF (2012) ACPYPE - Antechamber PYthon parser interfacE. BMC Res Notes 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-367 Lemkul J (2019) From proteins to perturbed hamiltonians: A suite of tutorials for the GROMACS-2018 molecular simulation package [Article v1.0]. Living J Comput Mol Sci. 1:5068. https://doi.org/10.33011/LIVECOMS.1.1.5068 Kumari R, Kumar R, Lynn A (2014) G-mmpbsa -A GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J Chem Inf Model 54:1951–1962. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500020m Ferreira L, dos Santos R, Oliva G, Andricopulo A (2015) Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules 20:13384–13421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384 Santos FRS, Nunes DAF, Lima WG et al (2020) Identification of Zika Virus NS2B-NS3 protease inhibitors by structure-based virtual screening and drug repurposing approaches. J Chem Inf Model 60:731–737. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00933 Zeng Z, Qian L, Cao L et al (2008) Virtual screening for novel quorum sensing inhibitors to eradicate biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1406-5 de Freitas RF, Schapira M (2017) A systematic analysis of atomic protein-ligand interactions in the PDB. Med Chem Comm 8:1970–1981. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MD00381A Adeniji SE, Arthur DE, Abdullahi M, Haruna A (2020) Quantitative structure–activity relationship model, molecular docking simulation and computational design of some novel compounds against DNA gyrase receptor. Chem Africa 3:391–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-020-00132-9 Das S, Sarmah S, Lyndem S, Singha Roy A (2021) An investigation into the identification of potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease using molecular docking study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:3347–3357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1763201 Zhou L, Ma YC, Tang X et al (2021) Identification of the potential dual inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma and leukocyte common antigen-related phosphatase by virtual screen, molecular dynamic simulations and post-analysis. J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1705913 Joshi T, Joshi T, Sharma P et al (2021) Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation approach to screen natural compounds for inhibition of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae by targeting peptide deformylase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:823–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1719200 Blanco-Díaz EG, Castrejón-González EO, Alvarado JFJ et al (2017) Rheological behavior of ionic liquids: analysis of the H-bond formation by molecular dynamics. J Mol Liq 242:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.06.128 Sinha SK, Prasad SK, Islam MA et al (2021) Identification of bioactive compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra as possible inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and non-structural protein-15: a pharmacoinformatics study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:4686–4700. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1779132