Identifying mRNA subsets in messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes by using cDNA arrays

Scott A. Tenenbaum1, Craig C. Carson1, Patrick J. Lager1, Jack D. Keene1
1Department of Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710

Tóm tắt

Genomic array technologies provide a means for profiling global changes in gene expression under a variety of conditions. However, it has been difficult to assess whether transcriptional or posttranscriptional regulation is responsible for these changes. Additionally, fluctuations in gene expression in a single cell type within a complex tissue like a tumor may be masked by overlapping profiles of all cell types in the population. In this paper, we describe the use of cDNA arrays to identify subsets of mRNAs contained in endogenous messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs) that are cell type specific. We identified mRNA subsets from P19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells by using mRNA-binding proteins HuB, eIF-4E, and PABP that are known to play a role in translation. The mRNA profiles associated with each of these mRNPs were unique and represented gene clusters that differed from total cellular RNA. Additionally, the composition of mRNAs detected in HuB–mRNP complexes changed dramatically after induction of neuronal differentiation with retinoic acid. We suggest that the association of structurally related mRNAs into mRNP complexes is dynamic and may help regulate posttranscriptional events such as mRNA turnover and translation. Recovering proteins specifically associated with mRNP complexes to identify and profile endogenously clustered mRNAs should provide insight into structural and functional relationships among gene transcripts and/or their protein products. We have termed this approach to functional genomics ribonomic s and suggest that it will provide a useful paradigm for organizing genomic information in a biologically relevant manner.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1128/MCB.19.3.1720

10.1128/MCB.19.11.7357

J D Richter Translational Control, eds J W B Hershey, M B Mathews, N Sonenberg (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), pp. 481–504 (1996).

10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.003401

10.1016/S0959-437X(97)80132-3

10.1073/pnas.83.6.1670

10.1016/0092-8674(86)90341-7

S C Schiavi, J G Belasco, M E Greenberg Biochim Biophys Acta 1114, 95–106 (1992).

10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89102-1

10.1128/MCB.17.2.954

10.1074/jbc.273.11.6417

10.1093/emboj/17.12.3448

10.1093/emboj/17.12.3461

10.1073/pnas.96.1.5

10.1073/pnas.92.10.4557

10.1086/514866

10.1016/0968-0004(91)90088-D

10.1126/science.8036511

10.1128/mcb.13.6.3494-3504.1993

10.1073/pnas.91.23.11207

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-01943.1994

10.1212/WNL.45.3.544

10.1074/jbc.271.14.8144

10.1093/nar/24.11.2011

10.1074/jbc.272.10.6593

10.1101/gad.13.4.449

10.1242/jcs.109.3.579

10.1242/dev.124.17.3449

10.1073/pnas.96.17.9885

10.1016/S0076-6879(96)67023-2

10.1242/jcs.111.21.3145

10.1128/mr.59.3.423-450.1995

10.1016/0168-9525(96)10016-0

M Wickens, J Kimble, S Strickland Translational Control, eds J W B Hershey, M B Mathews, N Sonenberg (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), pp. 411–450 (1996).

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80268-8

10.1038/345544a0

10.1093/nar/25.18.3564

10.1101/gad.11.19.2557

L G Andrews, J D Keene Methods Mol Biol 118, 233–244 (1999).

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-06907.1999

10.1073/pnas.95.1.334

10.1073/pnas.96.19.10632