Xác định Chức năng và Hành vi của Robot Xã hội cho Các Hoạt Động Học Tập Trong Lớp: Góc Nhìn của Giáo viên

Ahmad MI, Mubin O, Orlando J (2016) Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: Teacher’s perspective. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on human agent interaction, ACM, pp 297–304 Alemi M, Meghdari A, Ghazisaedy M (2014) Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. Int J Hum Robot 11(03):1450022 Bainbridge WA, Hart JW, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2011) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):41–52 Baxter P, Ashurst E, Read R, Kennedy J, Belpaeme T (2017) Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: personalisation promotes child learning. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0178126 Belpaeme T, Kennedy J, Ramachandran A, Scassellati B, Tanaka F (2018) Social robots for education: a review. Sci Robot 3(21):eaat5954 Belpaeme T, Vogt P, Van den Berghe R et al (2018) Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. Int J Soc Robot 10(3):325–341 Benitti FBV (2012) Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput Educ 58(3):978–988 Broadbent E, Feerst DA, Lee SH, Robinson H, Albo-Canals J, Ahn HS, MacDonald BA (2018) How could companion robots be useful in rural schools? Int J Soc Robot 10(3):295–307 Bryant SL, Forte A, Bruckman A (2005) Becoming wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of international ACM SIGGROUP conference on support group work, ACM, pp 1–10 Cha E, Chen S, Mataric MJ (2017) Designing telepresence robots for k-12 education. In: 26th International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 683–688 Chang CW, Lee JH, Chao PY, Wang CY, Chen GD (2010) Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. J Educ Technol Soc 13(2):13–24 Chase CC, Chin DB, Oppezzo MA, Schwartz DL (2009) Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. J Sci Educ Technol 18(4):334–352 Diep L, Cabibihan JJ, Wolbring G (2015) Social robots: views of special education teachers. In: Proceedings of 3rd workshop ICTs improve patients rehabilitation research technology, ACM, REHAB ’15, pp 160–163 Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki Engeström Y (2001) Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J Educ Work 14(1):133–156 Engeström Y, Sannino A (2010) Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educ Res Rev 5(1):1–24 Fernandes E, Fermé E, Oliveira R (2010) The robot race: understanding proportionality as a function with robots in mathematics class. In: Proceedings of the sixth congress of European research in mathematics education, pp 1211–1220 Fridin M (2014) Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: a tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Comput Educ 70:53–64 Gaudiello I, Zibetti E (2016) Learning robotics, with robotics, by robotics: educational robotics. Wiley Gordon G, Breazeal C (2015) Bayesian active learning-based robot tutor for children’s word-reading skills. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, pp 1343–1349 Hashimoto T, Verner I, Kobayashi H (2013) Human-like robot as teacher’s representative in a science lesson: an elementary school experiment. In: 1st International conference on robot intelligence technology and applications, Springer, pp 775–786 Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 7(2):174–196 Hood D, Lemaignan S, Dillenbourg P (2015) When children teach a robot to write: an autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 83–90 Huang CM, Mutlu B (2012) Robot behavior toolkit: generating effective social behaviors for robots. In: Proceedings of 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 25–32 Ej H, Sy K, Jang S, Park S (2008) Comparative study of effects of language instruction program using intelligence robot and multimedia on linguistic ability of young children. In: 17th International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 187–192 Janssen JB, van der Wal CC, Neerincx MA, Looije R (2011) Motivating children to learn arithmetic with an adaptive robot game. In: International conference on social robotic, Springer, pp 153–162 Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum Comput Interact 19(1–2):61–84 Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):962–971 Kaptelinin V, Nardi B (2012) Activity theory in HCI: fundamentals and reflections. Synth Lect Hum Cent Inform 5(1):1–105 Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA (2006) Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. MIT press Kim MG, Oosterling I, Lourens T, Staal W, Buitelaar J, Glennon J, Smeekens I, Barakova E (2014) Designing robot-assisted pivotal response training in game activity for children with autism. In: International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), IEEE, pp 1101–1106 Kory-Westlund J, Gordon G, Spaulding S, Lee JJ, Plummer L, Martinez M, Das M, Breazeal C (2016) Lessons from teachers on performing HRI studies with young children in schools. In: 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, IEEE Press, pp 383–390 Leite I, Castellano G, Pereira A, Martinho C, Paiva A (2014) Empathic robots for long-term interaction. Int J Soc Robot 6(3):329–341 Leontiev A (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Toneva M, Scassellati B (2012) The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. Proc Annu Meet Cogn Sci Soc 34(34):1882–1887 Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Scassellati B (2014) Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 423–430 Lubold N, Walker E, Pon-Barry H (2016) Effects of voice-adaptation and social dialogue on perceptions of a robotic learning companion. In: 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, IEEE Press, p 255–262 Mikropoulos TA, Bellou I (2013) Educational robotics as mindtools. Themes Sci Technol Educ 6(1):5–14 Movellan J, Eckhardt M, Virnes M, Rodriguez A (2009) Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In: Proceedings of 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human and robot interaction, ACM, pp 307–308 Mubin O, Stevens C, Shadid S, Al Mahmud A, Dong J (2013) A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technol Educ Learn 1:1–7 Murphy E, Rodriguez-Manzanares MA (2008) Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology. Aust J Educ Technol 24(4):442–457 Newton DP, Newton LD (2019) Humanoid robots as teachers and a proposed code of practice. Front Educ 4:125 Nordkvelle YT, Olson J (2005) Visions for ict, ethics and the practice of teachers. Educ Inf Technol 10(1–2):21–32 Rhorbach B (1969) Kreative nach regeln: methode 635, eine neue technik zum losen von problemen. Absatzwirtschaft 12:73–75 Rosenberg-Kima RB, Koren Y, Gordon G (2020) Robot-supported collaborative learning (RSCL): social robots as teaching assistants for higher education small group facilitation. Front Robot AI 6:148 Šabanović S (2010) Robots in society, society in robots. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):439–450 Saerbeck M, Schut T, Bartneck C, Janse MD (2010) Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 1613–1622 Serholt S, Barendregt W, Leite I, Hastie H, Jones A, Paiva A, Vasalou A, Castellano G (2014) Teachers’ views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. In: 23rd international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 955–960 Serholt S, Barendregt W, Vasalou A, Alves-Oliveira P, Jones A, Petisca S, Paiva A (2017) The case of classroom robots: teachers deliberations on the ethical tensions. AI Soc 32(4):613–631 Suchman LA (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press Tanaka F, Matsuzoe S (2012) Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):78–95 Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(46):17954–17958 van Ewijk G, Smakman M, Konijn EA (2020) Teachers’ perspectives on social robots in education: an exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference, ACM, pp 273–280 Winograd T, Flores F (1987) On understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design—a response to the reviews. Artif Intell 31(2):250–261 Yardi S, Bruckman A (2011) Social and technical challenges in parenting teens’ social media use. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 3237–3246 You ZJ, Shen CY, Chang CW, Liu BJ, Chen GD (2006) A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In: 6th International conference on advanced learning technologies, IEEE Computer Society, pp 87–91 Zaga C, Lohse M, Truong KP, Evers V (2015) The effect of a robot’s social character on children’s task engagement: Peer versus tutor. In: Tapus A, André E, Martin JC, Ferland F, Ammi M (eds) Social robotics, ICSR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Cham, vol 9388, pp 704–713