Identification accuracy of a single culprit in a multiple-perpetrator mock crime

Bindemann, 2012, Recognising faces seen alone or with others: Why are two heads worse than one?, Perception, 41, 415, 10.1068/p6922 Brewer, 2006, Role for theory in eyewitness identification research Chen, 2016, Decision making under the gambler's fallacy: Evidence from asylum judges, loan officers, and baseball umpires, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1181, 10.1093/qje/qjw017 Clifford, 1981, Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364, 10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.364 Deffenbacher, 2006, Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference, Law & Human Behavior, 30, 287307, 10.1007/s10979-006-9008-1 Dempsey, 2008, Identification accuracy of eyewitnesses for a multiple perpetrator crime: Examining the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures, American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26, 67 Doob, 1973, Bias in police lineups - partial remembering, Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), 2012 Fitzgerald, 2015, Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: A literature review and a novel methodology, Law and Human Behavior, 39, 62, 10.1037/lhb0000095 Fitzgerald, 2015, Eyewitness identification across the lifespan: A meta-analysis of age differences, Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1228, 10.1037/bul0000013 Fitzgerald, 2013, The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions: A meta-analysis, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 151, 10.1037/a0030618 Granhag, 2003, “I’ll never forget the sinking ferry!” How social influence makes false memories surface Gronlund, 2014, Evaluating eyewitness identification procedures using receiver operating characteristic analysis, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 3, 10.1177/0963721413498891 Halford, 2009 Haw, 2007, The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification, Memory, 15, 117, 10.1080/09658210601171672 Hobson, 2011, Eyewitness identification of multiple perpetrators, International Journal of Police Science & Management, 13, 286, 10.1350/ijps.2011.13.4.253 Home Office Research Development Statistics, 2009 Horry, 2014, Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: What can they tell us about eyewitness memory?, Law and Human Behavior, 38, 94, 10.1037/lhb0000060 Hugdahl, 2003, Dichotic listening in the study of auditory laterality Johnson, 1993, Source monitoring, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 Kask, 2009, The effects of different presentation methods on multi-ethnicity face recognition, Psychology, Crime, and Law, 15, 73, 10.1080/10683160802131131 Kask, 2015, Identification parades in Estonia: The state of the art, Proceedings: Estonian Academy of Security Sciences, 14, 25 Lampinen, 2016, ROC analyses in eyewitness identification research, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 21, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.006 Lin, 2019, The effects of repeated lineups and delay on eyewitness identification, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 16 Lindsay, 1980, What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy, Law and Human Behavior, 4, 303, 10.1007/BF01040622 Luus, 1991, Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups, Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43, 10.1007/BF01044829 Macmillan, 2005 Malmberg, 2012, On the relationship between memory and perception: Sequential dependencies in recognition memory testing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 233, 10.1037/a0025277 Mansour, 2017, Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials, Behavioral Research, 49, 2235, 10.3758/s13428-017-0855-0 Mickes, 2015, Receiver operating characteristic analysis and confidence-accuracy characteristic analysis in investigations of system variables and estimator variables that affect eyewitness memory, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 93, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.003 Mickes, 2012, Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 361 Mickes, 2017, Eyewitness identification Megreya, 2012, Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: Does accomplice gender matter?, British Journal of Psychology, 103, 439, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02084.x Megreya, 2011, Identification accuracy for single-and double-perpetrator crimes: Does accomplice gender matter?, British Journal of Psychology, 103, 439, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02084.x Megreya, 2006, Recognizing faces seen alone or with others: When two heads are worse than one, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 957, 10.1002/acp.1243 Memon, 2011, A field evaluation of the VIPER system: A new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence, Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 711, 10.1080/10683160903524333 Nortje, 2018 Oriet, 2018, The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments, Law and Human Behavior, 42, 1, 10.1037/lhb0000272 Peirce, 2007, PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 Psychology Software Tools Inc, 2019 Rosenthal, 1966 Russ, 2018, Individual differences in eyewitness accuracy across multiple lineups of faces, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, 30 Sauer, 2015, Confidence and accuracy of eyewitness identification Shepherd, 1983, Identification after long delays Steblay, 2013, Double exposure: The effects of repeated identification lineups on eyewitness accuracy, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 644 Stroop, 1935, Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643, 10.1037/h0054651 Smith, 2017, Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability, Law and Human Behavior, 41, 127, 10.1037/lhb0000219 Swets, 2000, Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1, 10.1111/1529-1006.001 Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence, 1999 Tredoux, 1998, Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness, Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217, 10.1023/A:1025746220886 Tupper, 2018, Showup identification decisions for multiple perpetrator crimes: Testing for sequential dependencies, PLoS ONE, 13, e0208403, 10.1371/journal.pone.0208403 Tupper, 2019, Eyewitness identification procedures for multiple perpetrator crimes: a survey of police in Sweden, Belgium, and the Netherlands, Psychology, Crime & Law, 25, 992, 10.1080/1068316X.2019.1611828 Wells, 1978, Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546, 10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1546 Wells, 1984, The psychology of lineup identifications, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02223.x Wells, 1993, What do we know about eyewitness identification?, American Psychologist, 48, 553, 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553 Wells, 2006, Accuracy of eyewitnesses with a two-culprit crime: Testing a new identification procedure, Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 417, 10.1080/10683160500050666 Wells, 1993, The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 835, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.835 Wells, 2015, ROC analysis of lineups does not measure underlying discriminability and has limited value, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 313, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.008 Wells, 2015, ROC analysis of lineups obscures information that is critical for both theoretical understanding and applied purposes, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 324, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.010 Wetmore, 2015, Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 8, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003 Wixted, 2014, A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification, Psychological Review, 121, 262, 10.1037/a0035940 Wixted, 2015, Evaluating eyewitness identification procedures: ROC analysis and its misconceptions, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 318, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.009 Wixted, 2015, ROC analysis measures objective discriminability for any eyewitness identification procedure, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 329, 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.007 Wixted, 2018, Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, 1 Wixted, 2016, Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 304, 10.1073/pnas.1516814112 Wixted, 2017, The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 10, 10.1177/1529100616686966 Wickham, 2000, Facial distinctiveness: Its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition, British Journal of Psychology, 91, 99, 10.1348/000712600161709 Yarmey, 1982, Eyewitness identification and stereotypes of criminals Zweig, 1993, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine, Clinical Chemistry, 39, 561, 10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561