HurryDate: Mate preferences in action

Evolution and Human Behavior - Tập 26 Số 3 - Trang 227-244 - 2005
Robert Kurzban1, Jason Weeden1
1Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bereczkei, 1997, Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: reproductive decisions in human mate choice, Ethology, 103, 681, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00178.x

Berscheid, 1971, Physical attractiveness and dating choice: a test of the matching hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173, 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90065-5

Buss, 1989, Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1, 10.1017/S0140525X00023992

Buss, 1998, Sexual strategies theory: historical origins and current status, Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19, 10.1080/00224499809551914

Buss, 2003

Buss, 1993, Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating, Psychological Review, 100, 204, 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Buston, 2003, Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8805, 10.1073/pnas.1533220100

Buunk, 2001, Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level, Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241, 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00065-4

Campos, 2002, Sex differences in mate selection strategies: content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil, Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395, 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00099-5

Cooper, 2002, Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: substantive and methodological trends over time, Journal of Personality, 70, 783, 10.1111/1467-6494.05024

Feingold, 1990, Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: a comparison across five research paradigms, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.981

Feingold, 1992, Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125

Geary, 2004, Evolution of human mate choice, Journal of Sex Research, 41, 27, 10.1080/00224490409552211

Goode, 1996, Gender and courtship entitlement: responses to personal ads, Sex Roles, 34, 141, 10.1007/BF01544293

Greenlees, 1994, Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements, Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59, 10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5

Hayek, 1988

Ingoldsby, 2003, Perceptions of acceptable mate attributes in Ecuador, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 171, 10.3138/jcfs.34.2.171

Jaffe, 1995, Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples, Human Biology, 67, 111

Keller, 1996, Mate assortment in dating and married couples, Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 217, 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00066-9

Kenrick, 1992, Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies, Behavior and Brain Sciences, 15, 75, 10.1017/S0140525X00067595

Kenrick, 1990, Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model, Journal of Personality, 58, 97, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x

Li, 2002, The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947

Lynn, 1984, Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349, 10.1177/0146167284103002

Maisey, 1999, Characteristics of male attractiveness for women, Lancet, 353, 1500, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00438-9

Pawlowski, 1999, Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 266, 281, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0634

Pawlowski, 1999, Withholding age as putative deception in mate search tactics, Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 53, 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00038-5

Pawlowski, 2002, The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements, Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139, 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00092-7

Pinker, 1997

Plomin, 1977, Assortative mating by unwed biological parents of adopted children, Science, 196, 449, 10.1126/science.850790

Simpson, 1991, Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870

Sitton, 1995, Men's preferences in romantic partners: obesity vs. addiction, Psychological Reports, 77, 1185, 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1185

Smith, 1991

Thiessen, 1997, Social pressures for assortative mating, Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 157, 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00181-X

Thornhill, 1999, The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality?, Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 105, 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00044-0

Todd, 1997, Searching for the next best mate, 419

Tovée, 2001, Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile, British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391, 10.1348/000712601162257

Tovée, 1999, Visual cues to female physical attractiveness, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 266, 211, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0624

Tovée, 1998, Optimal body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness, Lancet, 352, 548, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79257-6

Trivers, 1972, Parental investment and sexual selection, 136

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1996). Marital status and living arrangements: March 1994 (Current Population Reports, Series P20-484). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Waynforth, 1995, Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from lonely hearts advertisements, Behaviour, 132, 755, 10.1163/156853995X00135