Humanitarian support in a denial of access context: emergent strategies at the interface of humanitarian and sovereign law

Abdelmagid N, Checchi F, Garry S, Warsame A (2019) Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance. J Int Humanitarian Action 4(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0062-y Atkinson R, Flint J (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Soc Res Update 33(1):1–4 Bartels R (2018) The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and the Notion of State Sovereignty. J Confl Secur Law 23(3):461–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kry021 Beeckman K (2015) From fundamental principles to individual action: making the principles come alive to promote a culture of non-violence and peace. Int Rev Red Cross 97(897-898):263–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000569 Boersma K, Ferguson J, Mulder F, Wolbers J (2016) Humanitarian response coordination and cooperation in Nepal. Coping with challenges and dilemmas. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Boin A, Lodge M (2016) Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management: a time for public administration. Public Adm 94(2):289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12264 Bowen GA (2006) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. Int J Qual Methods 5(3):12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304 Broussard G, Rubenstein LS, Robinson C, Maziak W, Gilbert SZ, DeCamp M (2019) Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review. J Int Humanitarian Action 4(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x Browne K (2005) Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663 Büthe T, Major S, De Mello e Souza A (2012) The politics of private foreign aid: humanitarian principles, economic development objectives, and organizational interests in NGO private aid allocation. Int Organ 66(4):571–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000252 Cardia IV, Holzer A, Xu Y, Maitland C, Gillet D (2017) Towards a principled approach to humanitarian information and communication technology. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 2017, pp 1–5 Clarke PK, Campbell L (2020) Decision-making at the sharp end: a survey of literature related to decision-making in humanitarian contexts. J Int Humanitarian Action 5(1):1–14 Comfort LK (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm Rev 67:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x Cook ML (2011) “Humanitarian aid is never a crime”: Humanitarianism and illegality in migrant advocacy. Law Soc Rev 45(3):561–591 Das TK, Teng B-S (2001) Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organ Stud 22(2):251–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222004 Duffield M (2016) The resilience of the ruins: towards a critique of digital humanitarianism. Resilience 4(3):147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2016.1153772 Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 Fast L (2015) Unpacking the principle of humanity: Tensions and implications. Int Rev Red Cross 97(897-898):111–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000545 Ferguson JE, Soekijad M (2016) Multiple interests or unified voice? Online communities as intermediary spaces for development. J Inf Technol 31(4):358–381. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.25 Gasser H-P (1998) International humanitarian law and the protection of war victims. International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Methods 16(1):15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 Gómez MV, Kuronen M (2011) Comparing local strategies and practices: recollections from two qualitative cross-national research projects. Qual Res 11(6):683–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413366 Hantrais L (1999) Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2(2):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455799295078 Henckaerts JM, Doswald-Beck L (2005) Customary International Law, vol 1. ICRC/. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2015) International Humanitarian Law: Answers to your questions. Focus: Geneva International Court of Justice (ICJ) (1986) Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S) Jegers M (2002) Review of "Strategic Management for Voluntary Nonprofit Organizations", by Roger Courtney. Volunt Int J Volunt Nonprofit Org 13(4):432–434. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022079024259 Jeong H-W (2005) Peacebuilding in postconflict societies: strategy and process. Lynne Rienner, Boulder Johnson G, Melin L, Whittington R (2003) Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view. J Manag Stud 40(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00002 Kaldor M (2012) New and old wars: Organised violence in a global era. Polity Press, Cambridge Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F (2010) Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Dis Prev Manag Int J 19(4):452–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011070376 Kyazze AB (2015) Walking the walk: evidence of principles in action from Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies. Int Rev Red Cross 97(897-898):211–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000582 Labbé J, Daudin P (2015) Applying the humanitarian principles: Reflecting on the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Int Rev Red Cross 97(897-898):183–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000715 Labonte MT, Edgerton AC (2013) Towards a typology of humanitarian access denial. Third World Q 34(1):39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.755015 Leander A (2005) The market for force and public security: the destabilizing consequences of private military companies. J Peace Res 42(5):605–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343305056237 Mac Ginty R, Richmond OP (2013) The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace. Third World Q 34(5):763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750 Mačák K (2015) A matter of principle (s): The legal effect of impartiality and neutrality on States as humanitarian actors. Int Rev Red Cross 97(897-898):157–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000661 Maisel N (2015) Strange bedfellows: Private military companies and humanitarian organizations. Wis Int Law J 33:639–666 Malantowicz A (2013) Civil war in Syria and the new wars debate. Amsterdam Law Forum 5(3):52–60. https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.260 Marshall MN (1996) Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract 13(6):522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 Mayr A (2008) Language and power: an introduction to institutional discourse. Continuum International Publishing Group, London McCann M (2006) Law and social movements: contemporary perspectives. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 2(1):17–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105917 Meier P (2015) Digital humanitarians: How big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. Routledge, Abingdon. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18023 Morrison JB, Salipante P (2007) Governance for broadened accountability: blending deliberate and emergent strategizing. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 36(2):195–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295992 Mulder F, Ferguson J, Groenewegen P, Boersma K, Wolbers J (2016) Questioning Big Data: Crowdsourcing crisis data towards an inclusive humanitarian response. Big Data Soc 3(2):2053951716662054 Newman E (2014) The United Nations and human security: between solidarism and pluralism. In: Martin M, Owen T (eds) Routledge Handbook of Human Security. Routledge, London, pp 225–238 Ogliastri E, Jäger UP, Prado AM (2016) Strategy and structure in high-performing nonprofits: Insights from Iberoamerican cases. Volunt Int J Volunt Nonprofit Org 27(1):222–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9560-8 Pictet J (1979) The fundamental principles of the Red Cross. Int Rev Red Cross Arch 19(210):130–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400019872 Raymond NA, Card BL (2015) Applying humanitarian principles to current uses of information communication technologies: Gaps in doctrine and challenges to practice. In: Signal Program on Human Security and Technology. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Shaffer GC, Pollack MA (2011) Hard versus soft law in international security. Boston Coll Law Rev 52:1147–1242 Sheppard BH, Sherman DM (1998) The grammars of trust: a model and general implications. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):422–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926619 Starbird K, Palen L (2011) "Voluntweeters" self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2011, pp 1071–1080 Starr MK, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) Introduction to the special issue on humanitarian operations and crisis management. Prod Oper Manag 23(6):925–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12227 Thornborrow J (2014) Power talk: language and interaction in institutional discourse. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839172 Vaara E, Whittington R (2012) Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. Acad Manag Ann 6(1):285–336. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.672039 Walsham G (2017) ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf Technol Dev 23(1):18–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406 Wolbers J, Ferguson J, Groenewegen P, Mulder F, Boersma K (2016) Two faces of disaster response: transcending the dichotomy of control and collaboration during the Nepal earthquake relief operation. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 34(4):419–438