Human rights is not enough: The need for demonstrating efficacy of an ethical approach to interviewing in India

Legal and Criminological Psychology - Tập 13 Số 1 - Trang 89-106 - 2008
Laurence Alison1, Sudhansu Sarangi2, Allison M. Wright3
1Professor of Forensic Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK
2Deputy Inspector General of Police, Orissa, India
3Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, UK

Tóm tắt

Purpose. The present study compared attitudes about Human Rights (HR) and the advocation of coercive interviewing practices amongst Indian Police Officers, Offenders and a sample from the General Public.Method. 100 Police Officers, 50 Offenders and 50 members of the General Public completed a questionnaire that assessed their attitudes about the Human Rights of suspects and the use of coercion in suspect interviews.Results. Police Officers and the Public accepted both custodial violence and the use of intimidating interrogation strategies more readily than Offenders. They were also more prepared to suspend Suspects' Human Rights. Further, individuals who scored high on a coercive belief scale (CBS) were particularly inclined to favour custodial violence and suspend Human Rights. In addition, the self‐reported frequency with which Police Officers used intimidating and non‐intimidating interviewing techniques was related to their beliefs about Suspects' Human Rights and the extent to which they perceived intimidating interviewing methods to be useful.Conclusion. Attitudes about effective interviewing strategies may well be embedded within a broad social context. The effectiveness of a Human Rights Agenda requires that officers in India are informed of the effectiveness of ethical interviewing standards and the practical and legal dangers of using inappropriate methods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour

10.1016/0191-8869(94)90259-3

10.2307/1228828

Cassell P. G., 1999, The guilty and the innocent: An examination of alleged cases of wrongful conviction from false confessions, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 523

Cherryman J., 2000, Core issues in policing

Cohen, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

Fisher R. P., 2002, Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview, 265

Fisher R. P., 1992, Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview

10.1002/ejsp.2420130202

Gudjonsson G., 1992, The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony

Hair J. F., 1995, Multivariate data analysis with reading

10.4324/9780203329368

Howell D. C., 1997, Statistical methods for psychology

Irving B., 1980, Police interrogation: A case study of current practice

10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199824)16:1<115::AID-BSL296>3.0.CO;2-I

10.1080/10683169908414991

10.1080/10683169908415000

Milne R., 1999, Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice

10.1348/135532599167860

10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1347

10.1037/e449602008-001

10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.997

Tabachnick B. G., 2000, Using multivariate statistics

Turk A., 1969, Criminality and legal order

10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006

Vold G., 1958, Theoretical criminology

Vrij A., 2000, Detecting lies and deceit

Yuille J. C., 1993, Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony, 95

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative(2005).Police reforms India: Police structure and organisation. Retrieved on August 19 2005 from:http:www.humanrightsinitiative.orgprogramsajpoliceIndiahistorydefault.htm.

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, 2007, Police reform debate in India

Basu D. K.v. State of West Bengal AIR (1997).Supreme Court Cases p.Y16. Retrieved June 11 2005 from:http:www.worldlii.orgintcasesICHRL199695.html.

10.1002/bsl.470

Human Rights Act(1993).National Human Rights Commission India.

National Crime Records Bureau(2002).Crime in India 2002. Retrieved June 10 2005 from:http:www.ncrb.nic.in.

National Human Rights Commission(2003).Annual Report 2002–2003. Retrieved June 10 2005 from:http:www.nhrc.nic.in.

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) Bulletin(2003).Implementation of Supreme Court guidelines on arrest and detention. Retrieved June 13 2005 from:http:www.pucl.orgTopicsLaw2003guidelines.htm.

Indian Evidence Act(1872). Retrieved June 10 2005 from:http:www.vakilno1.combareactsindianevidenceactindianevidenceact.htm.

Indian Police Commission in India, 1913, History of Police Organisation in India 1902–1903

United Nations(1966).International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved June 13 2005 from:http:www.hrweb.orglegalcpr.html.

US Department of State(2004).Country reports on human rights practices: India‐2003. Retrieved 26 November 2007 fromhttp:www.state.govgdrlrlshrrpt200327947.htm.