Human error probability estimation for safety and diagnostic systems in railway engineering

Measurement: Sensors - Tập 18 - Trang 100105 - 2021
Marcantonio Catelani1
1University of Florence, Department of Information Engineering, via di S.Marta 3, 50139, Florence, IT, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

2017 Dhillon, 2007 De Felice, 2018 Qiu, 2015 Catelani, 2021, An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 215, 107866, 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107866 Gibson, 2006, A taxonomy of human communication errors and application to railway track maintenance, Cognit. Technol. Work, 8, 57, 10.1007/s10111-005-0020-x Grozdanovic, 2005, Usage of human reliability quantification methods, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 11, 153, 10.1080/10803548.2005.11076644 Wreathall, 2004, Using an integrated process of data and modeling in HRA, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 83, 221, 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.012 Gibson, 2007, A Train driving simulator experiment to investigate driver fault diagnosis Kirwan, 1998, Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk systems - Part 1: review and evaluation of techniques, Appl. Ergon., 29, 157, 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00010-6 2006 Vanderhaegen, 2001, “A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method — application to railway system, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 71, 1, 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00060-0 Cacciabue, 2005, Human error risk management methodology for safety audit of a large railway organisation, Applied Ergonomics, 36, 709, 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.04.005 Gibson, 2012, 1 Cai, 1996 Ross, 2010 S. Kabir and Y. Papadopoulos, “A review of applications of fuzzy sets to safety and reliability engineering,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 100, pp. 29–55, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.005. Jiang, 2018, A new approach to fuzzy dynamic fault tree analysis using the weakest n-dimensional t-norm arithmetic, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 31, 1506, 10.1016/j.cja.2018.04.014