Human Echolocation: Blind and Sighted Persons' Ability to Detect Sounds Recorded in the Presence of a Reflecting Object

Perception - Tập 39 Số 4 - Trang 483-501 - 2010
Bo N. Schenkman1, Mats E. Nilsson2
1Blekinge Institute of Technology, Box 520, SE-372 25 Ronneby, Sweden and Centre for Speech Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
2Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Research suggests that blind people are superior to sighted in echolocation, but systematic psychoacoustic studies on environmental conditions such as distance to objects, signal duration, and reverberation are lacking. Therefore, two experiments were conducted. Noise bursts of 5, 50, or 500 ms were reproduced by a loudspeaker on an artificial manikin in an ordinary room and in an anechoic chamber. The manikin recorded the sounds binaurally in the presence and absence of a reflecting 1.5-mm thick aluminium disk, 0.5 m in diameter, placed in front, at distances of 0.5 to 5 m. These recordings were later presented to ten visually handicapped and ten sighted people, 30–62 years old, using a 2AFC paradigm with feedback. The task was to detect which of two sounds that contained the reflecting object. The blind performed better than the sighted participants. All performed well with the object at < 2 m distance. Detection increased with longer signal durations. Performance was slightly better in the ordinary room than in the anechoic chamber. A supplementary experiment on the two best blind persons showed that their superior performance at distances > 2 m was not by chance. Detection thresholds showed that blind participants could detect the object at longer distances in the conference room than in the anechoic chamber, when using the longer-duration sounds and also as compared to the sighted people. Audiometric tests suggest that equal hearing in both ears is important for echolocation. Possible echolocation mechanisms are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American National Standards Institute, 1997, Method for Manual Pure-tone Threshold Audiometry

10.1016/S0003-682X(97)00010-8

Ashmead D H, 1999, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 313

Au W W L, 2004, Echolocation in Bats and Dolphins, XIII

10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00708.x

10.1121/1.1919117

10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006

Bilsen F A, 1968, On the Interaction of a Sound with its Repetitions

10.1121/1.1914500

Bilsen F A, 1969, Acustica, 22, 63

Blauert J, 1983, Spatial Hearing

10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.900

10.4161/cib.1.2.7107

10.2307/1418868

10.1007/0-387-28958-5_6

10.1121/1.2400848

Gibson J J, 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

Griffin D R, 1958, Listening in the Dark: The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men

10.1121/1.1913556

10.3109/00016488309105590

Howell D C, 1997, Statistical Methods for Psychology

Juurmaa J, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1, 80, 10.2340/1650197701080084

10.1126/science.137.3528.399

Kirk R E, 1968, Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioural Sciences

Macmillan N A, 2005, Detection Theory: A User's Guide

10.1016/B978-012515851-0/50005-9

10.1016/j.jsv.2006.11.010

Papoulis A, 1984, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes

10.1068/p5441

Rice C E, 1966, Proceedings of the International Conference on Sensory Devices for the Blind, 89

10.1126/science.155.3763.656

10.1007/BF03393822

10.1037/h0022215

10.1207/S15326969ECO1203_1

Schenkman B, 1985, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Abstracts of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 36

10.1177/001872088602800510

10.1207/s15326969eco0703_2

10.2307/1416946

10.1068/p5001

Wilson J P, 1967, Animal Sonar Systems. Biology and Bionics, 1, 89

10.1121/1.416973

10.1121/1.418148

Yost W A, 2007, Fundamentals of Hearing

10.1121/1.414593