How well centrality measures capture student achievement in computer-supported collaborative learning? – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Educational Research Review - Tập 35 - Trang 100437 - 2022
Mohammed Saqr1,2, Ramy Elmoazen1, Matti Tedre1, Sonsoles López-Pernas3,2, Laura Hirsto2
1University of eastern Finland, School of Computing, Joensuu, Yliopistokatu 2, fi, 80100, Joensuu, Finland
2University of eastern Finland, Philosophical Faculty, School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, Yliopistokatu 2, fi, 80100, Joensuu, Finland
3Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos, ETSI Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/ Alan Turing s/n, 28031, Madrid, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agudo-Peregrina, 2014, Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 542, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031 Bernard, 2009, A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education, Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243, 10.3102/0034654309333844 Borgatti, 2019, Centrality: Concepts and measures, 9 Borgatti, 2009, Network analysis in the social sciences, Science, 323, 892, 10.1126/science.1165821 Borokhovski, 2016, Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: A meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments, Computers and Education, 96, 15, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.004 Cadima, 2012, Social networks and performance in distributed learning communities, Educational Technology & Society, 15, 296 Cela, 2014, Social network analysis in E-learning environments: A preliminary systematic review, Educational Psychology Review, 27, 219, 10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0 Chen, 2018, The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 88, 799, 10.3102/0034654318791584 Cho, 2007, Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community, Computers and Education, 49, 309, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003 Dado, 2017, A review of methodological applications of social network analysis in computer-supported collaborative learning, Educational Research Review, 22, 159, 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.005 De-La-Fuente-Valentín, 2014, Technological support for the enactment of collaborative scripted learning activities across multiple spatial locations, Future Generation Computer Systems, 31, 223, 10.1016/j.future.2013.05.007 De-Marcos, 2016, Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.052 Dillenbourg, 2009, 3 Dwan, 2013, Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias—an updated review, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844 Enyedy, N., & Stevens, R. (n.d.). Analyzing Collaboration. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 191–212). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.013. Freeman, 1978, Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215, 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 Gašević, 2019, SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003 Gurevitch, 2018, Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis, Nature, 555, 175, 10.1038/nature25753 Hernández-García, 2015, Applying social learning analytics to message boards in online distance learning: A case study, Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 68, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.038 Higgins, 2002, Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539, 10.1002/sim.1186 Jalili, 2015, CentiServer: A comprehensive resource, web-based application and R package for centrality analysis, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0143111 Jeong, 2016, Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help?, Educational Psychologist, 51, 247, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654 Jeong, 2019, Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014, Educational Research Review, 28, 100284, 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284 John-Steiner, 1996, Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework, Educational Psychologist, 31, 191, 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266 Joksimovic, 2016, Translating network position into performance: Importance of centrality in different network configurations, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 25–29, 314 Joober, 2012, Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?, Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 37, 149, 10.1503/jpn.120065 Jo, 2017, Three interaction patterns on asynchronous online discussion behaviours: A methodological comparison, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 106, 10.1111/jcal.12168 Liao, 2017, Ranking in evolving complex networks, Physics Reports, 689, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.001 Liu, 2019, Effects of proactive personality and social centrality on learning performance in SPOCs, CSEDU 2019 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 2, 481 Liu, 2018, Social network characteristics of learners in a course forum and their relationship to learning outcomes, CSEDU 2018 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 15 Liu, 2018, Investigate the relationship between learners' social characteristics and academic achievements, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1113 Moher, 2015, Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement, Systematic Reviews, 4, 1, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 Osatuyi, 2016, Twittermania: Understanding how social media technologies impact engagement and academic performance of a new generation of learners, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 39, 509, 10.17705/1CAIS.03923 Plesser, 2018, Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A brief history of a confused terminology, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 11, 1, 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076 Poquet, 2020, Intergroup and interpersonal forum positioning in shared-thread and post-reply networks, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 187 Poquet, 2021, Recommendations for network research in learning analytics: To open a conversation, Proceedings of the NetSciLA21 Workshop Putnik, 2016, Analysing the correlation between social network analysis measures and performance of students in social network-based engineering education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 413, 10.1007/s10798-015-9318-z 2018 Reychav, 2018, Centrality measures and academic achievement in computerized classroom social networks: An empirical investigation, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56, 589, 10.1177/0735633117715749 Rodríguez-Triana, 2015, Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 330, 10.1111/bjet.12198 Romero, 2013, Predicting students' final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums, Computers and Education, 68, 458, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.009 Saqr, 2019, The role of social network analysis as a learning analytics tool in online problem based learning, BMC Medical Education, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12909-019-1599-6 Saqr, 2018, Using social network analysis to understand online problem-based learning and predict performance, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0203590 Saqr, 2018, How the study of online collaborative learning can guide teachers and predict students' performance in a medical course, BMC Medical Education, 18, 24, 10.1186/s12909-018-1126-1 Saqr, 2018, How social network analysis can be used to monitor online collaborative learning and guide an informed intervention, PLoS One, 13, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0194777 Saqr, 2019, A learning analytics study of the effect of group size on social dynamics and performance in online collaborative learning, 11722 Schwarzer, 2015, 21 Schwarzer, 2015 Sie, 2012, Social network analysis for technology-enhanced learning: Review and future directions, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 172, 10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051582 Stahl, 2014, Computer-supported collaborative learning, 479 Traxler, 2016, CourseNetworking and community: Linking online discussion networks and course success. Proceedings of the, 2016 Physics Education Research Conference, 352, 10.1119/perc.2016.pr.083 Wecker, 2014, Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers and Education, 75, 218, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.016 Wise, 2018, Unpacking the relationship between discussion forum participation and learning in MOOCs: Content is key, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 330 Zhou, 2012, Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation, Learning and Instruction, 22, 413, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.004