How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?

Bornmann, 2011, Scientific peer review, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45, 199, 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 Bornmann, 2013, The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 722, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.05.002 Bornmann, 2008, What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior, Journal of Documentation, 64, 45, 10.1108/00220410810844150 Bornmann, 2012, The new excellence indicator in the world report of the SCImago institutions rankings 2011, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 333, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.006 Bornmann, 2013, The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 286, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003 Bornmann, 2013, The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 158, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.001 Bornmann, 2013, Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100), Journal of Informetrics, 8, 933, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.003 Bornmann, 2013, A multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1649, 10.1002/asi.22857 Bornmann, 2013, How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 562, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.005 Cox, 2005 Didegah, 2013, Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1055, 10.1002/asi.22806 Goldstein, 1996, League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A – Statistics in Society, 159, 385, 10.2307/2983325 Guerrero-Bote, 2012, A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 674, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001 Hardin, 2012 Harnad, 2008, Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 103, 10.3354/esep00088 Hazen, 1914, Storage to be provided in impounding reservoirs for municipal water supply, Transactions of American Society of Civil Engineers, 77, 1539, 10.1061/taceat.0002563 Hyndman, 1996, Sample quantiles in statistical packages, American Statistician, 50, 361 Kline, 2004 Kohler, 2012 Long, 2006 StataCorp., 2013 Taborsky, 2009, Biased citation practice and taxonomic parochialism, Ethology, 115, 105, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01610.x Vieira, 2010, Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 1, 10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002 Waltman, 2012, The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2419, 10.1002/asi.22708 Wang, 2013, Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation, Scientometrics, 94, 851, 10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9