How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach

Anderson, 2013, Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments, Decis Anal, 10, 121, 10.1287/deca.2013.0268

Antunes, 2006, Participatory decision making for sustainable development—the use of mediated modelling technique, Land Use Policy, 23, 44, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014

Banville, 1998, A stakeholder approach to MCDA, Syst Res, 15, 15, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::AID-SRES179>3.0.CO;2-B

Bayley, 2008, Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision, Group Decis Negotiat, 17, 195, 10.1007/s10726-007-9076-8

Beierle, 2002, The quality of stakeholder-based decisions, Risk Anal, 22, 739, 10.1111/0272-4332.00065

Beierle, 2002

Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

Burgess, 2007, Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science policy decisions, Public Underst Sci, 16, 299, 10.1177/0963662507077510

Carson, 2009, Deliberative public participation and hexachlorobenzene stockpiles, J Environ Manage, 90, 1636, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.019

Daniels, 2001

Depoe SP, Delicath JW, Elsenbeer MFA (eds) (2004) Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. State University of New York Press, NY

Gregory, 2012

Hämäläinen, 2008, The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis, Ecol Econ, 68, 556, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.025

Hämäläinen RP, Mustajoki J, Marttunen M (2010) Web-based decision support: creating a culture of applying multi-criteria decision analysis and web supported participation in environmental decision making. In Rios-Insua D, French S (eds.): e-Democracy: a group decision and negotiation perspective. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation 5, Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, pp 201–221

Hedelin, 2007, Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management, Environ Manage, 39, 151, 10.1007/s00267-004-0387-0

Hobbs, 1997, Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas, Energy Policy, 25, 357, 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00025-6

Hostmann, 2005, Stakeholder values in decision support for river rehabilitation, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement 155, 491

Huang, 2011, Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends, Sci Total Environ, 409, 3578, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Kangas, 2001, MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences, J Multi Crit Decis Anal, 10, 257, 10.1002/mcda.306

Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M (2008) Decision support for forest management. Manage For Ecosyst, vol 16. Springer, Berlin

Karjalainen, 2013, Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: an analytic-deliberative approach, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 40, 54, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001

Keeney, 1992

Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

Kiker, 2005, Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making, Integr Environ Assess Manage, 1, 95, 10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1

Lahdelma, 1998, SMAA—stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis, Eur J Oper Res, 106, 137, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X

Linkov, 2006, Multicriteria decision analysis: a comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments, Risk Anal, 26, 61, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x

Marttunen M (2011) Interactive multi-criteria decision analysis in the collaborative management of watercourses. Aalto University publication series: Doctoral Dissertations 75/2011, Helsinki

Marttunen, 1995, Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment, Eur J Oper Res, 87, 551, 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00229-4

Marttunen, 2008, Decision analysis interviews in supporting collaborative management of a large regulated water course, Environ Manage, 42, 1026, 10.1007/s00267-008-9200-9

Morgan RK (1998) Environmental impact assessment: a methodological perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

Munda, 2004, Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences, Eur J Oper Res, 158, 662, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2

Munda, 2006, Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies, Land Use Policy, 23, 86, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.012

Munda, 2008

Mustajoki, 2000, Web-Hipre: global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis, INFOR, 38, 208

Mustajoki, 2007, Interactive computer support in decision conferencing: two cases on off-site nuclear emergency management, Decis Support Syst, 42, 2247, 10.1016/j.dss.2006.07.003

Mustajoki, 2011, Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland, J Environ Manage, 92, 1550, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007

Patchak WM (2012) Software survey: decision analysis. OR/MS Today 39(5). http://www.orms-today.org/surveys/das/das.html

Phillips LD (2007) Decision conferencing. In: Edwards W, Miles RF Jr., von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 375–399

Phillips, 2007, Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing, Ann Oper Res, 154, 51, 10.1007/s10479-007-0183-3

Phillips, 1993, Facilitated work groups: theory and practice, J Oper Res Soc, 44, 533, 10.1057/jors.1993.96

Pöyhönen, 2000, There is hope in attribute weighting, INFOR, 38, 272

Pöyhönen, 2001, On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods, Eur J Oper Res, 129, 569, 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00467-1

Renn, 2006, Participatory processes for designing environmental policies, Land Use Policy, 23, 34, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.005

Rytkönen A-M, Marttunen M, Lehmonen A-M, Mustajoki J (2013) Involvement of local stakeholders with multi-criteria decision analysis in flood risk management in Finland. Manuscript

Saarikoski, 2013, Participatory multi-criteria assessment as ‘opening up’ vs. ‘closing down’ of policy discourses: a case of old-growth forest conflict in Finnish Upper Lapland, Land Use Policy, 32, 329, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.003

Salgado, 2009, Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives: a case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga), Ecol Econ, 68, 990, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.008

Sparrevik, 2011, Use of multicriteria involvement processes to enhance transparency and stakeholder participation at Bergen Harbor, Norway, Integr Environ Assess Manage, 7, 414, 10.1002/ieam.182

Steele, 2009, Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making, Risk Anal, 29, 26, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x

Stirling, 2006, Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis, Land Use Policy, 23, 95, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010

Weber, 1993, Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making, Eur J Oper Res, 67, 1, 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-H

Webler, 2006, Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: combined results from 10 case studies, Policy Stud J, 34, 699, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00198.x

Wondolleck, 2000