How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism?

Attfield, Robin. 1979. How not to be a moral relativist The Monist 62: 510–523.

Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1936. Language, truth and logic. London: Victor Gollancz. (2nd ed. 1946).

Benacerraf, Paul. 1973. Mathematical truth. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 661–680.

Bennigson, Thomas. 1996. Irresolvable disagreement and the case against moral realism. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 34: 411–437.

Blackburn, Simon. 1981. Reply: Rule-following and moral realism. In Wittgenstein: To follow a rule, ed. S. H. Holtzman and C. M. Leich, 163–187. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Boghossian, Paul. 2000. Knowledge of logic. In New Essays on the A Priori, ed. Paul Boghossian and Christopher Peacocke, 229–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bond, E. J. 1983. Reason and value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bonjour, Laurence. 1998. In defense of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boyd, Richard. 1988. How to be a moral realist. In Essays on moral realism, ed. G. Sayre-McCord, 181–228. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

Brandt, Richard. 1944. The significance of differences of ethical opinion for ethical rationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 469–495.

Brink, David. 1989. Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brink, David. 2001. Realism, naturalism, and moral semantics. Social Philosophy and Policy 18: 154–176.

Carson, Thomas, and Paul Moser. 2001. Introduction. In Moral relativism—a reader, ed. Thomas Carson and Paul Moser, 1–21. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chang, Ruth. 1997. Introduction. In Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason, ed. Ruth Chang, 1–34. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Copp, David, and David Zimmerman. ed. 1984. Morality, reason and truth—new essays on the foundations of ethics. Totowa N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld.

Dancy, Jonathan. 2000. Practical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Darwall, Stephen. 1983. Impartial reason. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

Darwall, Stephen, Allan Gibbard, and Peter Railton. 1992. Toward Fin de Siecle ethics: Some trends. The Philosophical Review 101: 115–189; reprinted in 1997, ed. S. Darwall, A. Gibbard, and P. Railton. Moral discourse and practice: Some philosophical approaches, 3–47. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25:87–139.

Enoch, David. 2003. An argument for robust metanormative realism (Ph.D. Thesis, NYU, 2003), available at: http://www.law.huji.ac.il/eng/segel.asp?cat=441&in=441&staff_id=63&staff_page=208

Enoch, David. 2005. Why idealize? Ethics 115(4): 759–787.

Enoch, David. 2006. Agency, shmagency: Why normativity won’t come from what is constitutive of agency. Philosophical Review 115: 169–198.

Enoch, David. 2007a. An outline of an argument for robust metanormative realism. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2: 21–50.

Enoch, David. 2007b. Rationality, coherence, convergence: A critical comment of Michael Smith’s Ethics and the A Priori. Philosophical Books 48: 99–108.

Enoch, David, and Joshua Schechter. 2008. How are basic belief-forming methods justified? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 547–579.

Field, Hartry. 1989. Realism, mathematics, and modality. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Gert, Joshua. 2002. Expressivism and language learning. Ethics 112: 292–314.

Gibbard, Allan. 2003. Thinking how to live. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Goldman, Alan. 1990. Skepticism about goodness and rightness. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 29(Supplement): 167–183.

Gowans, Christopher. 2000a. Introduction. In Gowans (2000b), 1–43.

Gowans, Christopher. ed. 2000b. Moral disagreements: Classic and contemporary readings. London and New York: Routledge.

Gowans, Christopher. 2004. A priori refutations of disagreement arguments against moral objectivity: Why experience matters. The Journal of Value Inquiry 38: 141–157.

Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The nature of morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harman, Gilbert. 1984. Is there a single true morality? In Copp and Zimmerman, 27–48.

Harman, Gilbert, and Judith Jarvis Thomson. 1996. Moral relativism and moral objectivity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Horgan, Terry, and Mark Timmons. 1991. New wave moral realism meets moral twin Earth. Journal of Philosophical Research 16: 447–465.

Hume, David. 1751/1957. An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Liberal Arts Press.

Hurley, Susan. 1989. Natural reasons. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Kim, Jaegwon. 1998. Reasons and the first person. In Human action, deliberation and causation, ed. J. A. M. Bransen and S. E. Cuypers, 67–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Korsgaard, Christine. 2002. Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. The 2002 Locke Lectures, available at http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/

Lewis, David. 1982. Logic for equivocators. Noûs 16: 431–441; reprinted in his Papers in philosophical logic, 97–110. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.

Lillehammer, Hallvard. 2004. Moral error theory. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 95–111.

Loeb, David. 1998. Moral realism and the argument from disagreement. Philosophical Studies 90: 281–303.

Mackie, John. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Marmor, Andrei. 2001. Positive law and objective values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, Michael. 2007. In defense of Ethics and the A priori: A reply to Enoch, Hieronymi, and Tannenbaum. Philosophical Books 48: 136–149.

Moody-Adams, Michele. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: Morality, culture and philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Moore, Michael. 1992. Moral reality revisited. Michigan Law Review 90: 2425–2533.

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The view from nowhere. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oddie, Graham. 2005. Value, reality and desire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Rachels, James. 1999. The elements of moral philosophy (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Railton, Peter. 1993. What the non-cognitivist helps us to see the naturalist must help us to explain. In Reality, representation and projection, ed. J. Haldane and C. Wright, 279–300. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rawls, John. 1980. Kantian construcitvism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–572.

Raz, Joseph. 2001. Notes on value and objectivity. In Objectivity in law and morals, ed. B. Leiter, 194–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Raz, J. 1999. Engaging reason, 118–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosati, Connie. 2003. Agency and the open question argument. Ethics 113: 490–527.

Rosen, Gideon. 2001. Nominalism, naturalism, epistemic relativism. Philosophical Perspectives 15: 69–91.

Scanlon, Thomas. 1995. Moral theory: Understanding and disagreement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 343–356.

Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The things we mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schneewind, Jerome. 1998. The invention of autonomy—a history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seabright, Paul. 1988. Objectivity, disagreement, and projectibility. Inquiry 31: 25–51.

Shafer-Landau, Russ. 1994. Ethical disagreement, ethical objectivism and moral indeterminacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 331–344.

Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2003. Moral realism—a defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2006. Ethics as philosophy: A defense of ethical nonnaturalism. In Metaethics after moore, ed. T. Horgan and M. Timmons, 209–232. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2006. Moral skepticisms. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Stratton-Lake, Philip. 2002. Introduction. In Ethical intuitionism: Re-evaluations, ed. Philip Stratton-Lake, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Street, Sharon. 2003. Evolution and the nature of reasons. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.

Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1984. Moral explanations. In Copp and Zimmerman, 49–78.

Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1992. Nonmoral explanations. Philosophical Perspectives 6: 97–117.

Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1994. Moral disagreement and moral relativism. Social Philosophy and Policy 11: 80–115.

Sturgeon , Nicholas. 2006. Ethical naturalism. In The oxford handbook of ethical theory, ed. David Copp, 91–121. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Swinburne, Richard. 1976. The objectivity of morality. Philosophy 51: 5–20.

Tersman, Folke. 2006. Moral disagreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thagard, Paul. 1978. The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy 75: 76–92.

Tolhurst, William. 1987. The argument from moral disagreement. Ethics 97: 610–621.

Unger, Peter. 1996. Living high and letting die. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Fraassen, Bastiaan. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Van Fraassen, Bastiaan. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.

Velleman, J. David. 1996. The possibility of practical reason. Ethics 106: 694–726; reprinted in his The possibility of practical reason, 170–199. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1992. The irrelevance of moral objectivity. In Natural law theory: Contemporary essays, ed. Robert George, 158–187. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wedgwood, Ralph. 2001. Conceptual role semantics for moral terms. The Philosophical Review 110: 1–30.

Wedgwood, Ralph. 2007. The nature of normativity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Wiggins, David. 1990. Moral cognitivism, moral relativism and motivating moral beliefs. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 61–86.

Williams, Bernard. 1980. Internal and external reasons. In his Moral luck, 101–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wong, David. 1984. Moral relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wong, David. 1986. On moral realism without foundation. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 24(Supp.): 95–113.

Wright, Crispin. 1992. Truth and objectivity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.