How does reciprocal behaviour of workers influence the wage setting of unions?

Tobias Kronenberg1
1Institute of Energy Research, Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEF-STE), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany

Tóm tắt

Traditional wage setting models assume that unions maximise the total income of workers, whereas actually they should maximise worker utility. These models implicitly equate utility with income, but this is not valid if workers’ utility depends on their sense of fairness and includes a non-pecuniary benefit from work. This paper presents a model combining efficiency wages with bargaining theory, drawing inspiration from the gift-exchange approach by Akerlof [Q J Econ 97(4):543–569, 1982]. It shows that the mutual gift exchange between firms and workers generates a non-pecuniary benefit which contributes to the workers’ utility in a non-monotonic way depending on the strength of workers’ sense of fairness. The model shows that if an employment subsidy is paid to workers it generates more jobs than when paid to firms.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Akerlof GA (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Q J Econ 97(4): 543–569 Altenburg L and Straub M (2002). Taxes on labour and unemployment in a shirking model with union bargaining. Labour Econ 8: 721–744 Bewley T (2004) Fairness, reciprocity, and wage rigidity. IZA Discussion paper No. 1137 Blanchflower DG and Oswald AJ (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88: 1359–1386 Farzin YH, Akao K (2006) Non-pecuniary work incentives and labor supply. FEEM working paper No. 21.2006 Fehr E and Gächter S (2000). Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J Econ Perspect 14(3): 159–181 Hendricks WE and Kahn LM (1991). Efficiency wages, monopoly unions and efficient bargaining. Econ J 101: 1149–1162 Layard R, Nickell S and Jackman R (1991). Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, Oxford Mauleon A and Vannetelbosch VJ (2003). Efficiency wages and union-firm bargaining with private information. Span Econ Rev 5: 307–316 Muysken J and van Veen T (1996). Efficiency wages and local wage bargaining. Scand J Econ 98: 119–127 Olthoff R (2002) Efficiency wages, bargaining power, and wage gaps. PhD Thesis, Maastricht University Peiró A (2006). Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: some international evidence. J Socio Econ 35: 348–365 Salop S (1979). A model of the natural rate of unemployment. Am Econ Rev 69(1): 117–125 Shapiro C and Stiglitz JE (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a workers discipline device. Am Econ Rev 74(3): 433–444 Sparks R (1985). A model of involuntary unemployment and wage rigidity: worker incentives and the threat of dismissal. J Labor Econ 4(4): 560–581 Strand J (2002). Wage bargaining versus efficiency wages: a synthesis. Bull Econ Res 55(1): 1–20 Summers LH (1988). Relative wages, efficiency wages and keynesian unemployment. Am Econ Rev 78(2): 383–388 Weiss A (1980). Job queues and layoffs in labor markets with flexible wage. J Polit Econ 88(3): 526–538 Winkelmann L and Winkelmann R (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica 65: 1–15